Sign In Join 



Honda Civic Real World MPG

2058 messages,  Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 6:19 PM

You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 188 of 207
1
...
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
...
207
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1862 of 2058
Re: 06 Civic and ScanGuage [thegraduate] by targettuning
Oct 29, 2008 (9:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Oct 29, 2008 8:19 am)

Yeah, there are some but other than the Elantra (it does) I cannot tell you which ones do. Others have indicated the Corolla and Chevy Cobalt have this feature as well.
#1863 of 2058
Re: 06 Civic and ScanGuage [sebring95] by thegraduate
Oct 29, 2008 (9:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: sebring95 (Oct 29, 2008 9:07 am)

Thanks for the reply. I haven't been in any other new compacts lately. I've test driven the new Accord, Altima, and 6, but haven't been in the above mentioned vehicles in awhile.
#1864 of 2058
by kenlw
Oct 29, 2008 (4:56 pm)
Reply
heck, our 93 chrysler minivan had an excellent trip computer: instant mpg, ave mpg, miles to empty, compass....... dumped it at 120k miles, the computer was about the only thing that hadn't been replaced under extended waranty.
#1865 of 2058
MPG LOSS by ruking1
Oct 30, 2008 (8:19 am)
Reply
New tires will crash mpg anywhere from 1-6 mpg. I have new tires and alignment and swag I will lose 1-2 mpg (or from 38-42 mpg) , so the range will now be between 36-41 mpg for a while.
#1866 of 2058
Re: I believe [targettuning] by targettuning
Oct 30, 2008 (9:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: targettuning (Oct 28, 2008 4:42 am)

Keep in mind though that although I now believe the Civic (at least the 2006/07/08 generation) can and will obtain fuel economy north of 40 mpg on specific or individual trips using gas saving techniques and speeds on highway drives I still don't necessarily buy the claims of ....say, 41 mpg AVERAGES. In order to boost an average to that lofty number the high # would have to be stellar and the low would have to be, well, stellar too. This might be more than I am willing to concede.
Somewhat contrite
#1867 of 2058
Re: I believe [targettuning] by ruking1
Oct 30, 2008 (9:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: targettuning (Oct 30, 2008 9:00 am)

So you DO need another (apologetic) scan gauge !? The truth is the range of 38-42 was with no fuel miser concerns. AND we are doing it with one less gear and an older model. It is strictly, fill the tank, write down the figures, do the math- report!! It is a no brainer to start to implement some fuel miser techniques. It is truly NOT rocket science, other than we don't do so bad NOT taking any measures. We are impressed that we cut the actual commute miles (for 2 persons) literally in half by sharing the commute.
#1868 of 2058
Scan Gauge by kipk
Oct 31, 2008 (2:50 am)
Reply
I believe a scan gauge would help, if we use it properly.
 
For example: Most of the local speed limits in our area are 45 mph. Our Pilot AT won't shift into 5th and OD until 50 mpg. So should I speed up and allow the shift for slower engine RPM with more air resistance and the engine possibly not really in a "sweet spot"? Or stay at the 45mph speed in 4th gear with less air drag and possibly a bit less stress on the engine, etc.?
 
Same would be true with a MT car, especially on hills. Is it better to keep it in a higher gear with the throttle closer to the floor, or drop down a gear and use less throttle although the injectors are firing more frequently but with less volume?
 
On the road, we have, at times, experienced about the same or better mileage at a slightly higher speed. Is it because the tranny downshifted less on the hills? Or the engine had a bit more power to deal with some other condition(s).
 
What we don't know is: How the road surface, elevation, prevailing wind speed and direction, barometric pressure, humidity, load, and so forth were affecting the mileage on that particular day and trip. We also don't know where the engines "Sweet Spot" is. Is it 1800 rpm, 1900 rpm, or more or less?
 
I fill the tank the same way every time. Put the nozzle in as far as it will go and set it on the slowest setting. When it clicks off , wait a few seconds and gently squeeze until it clicks off a second time and stop. I try to use the same pump every time, although that is not an option on the road. Problem is that the tilt of the car will dictate how much fuel the tank will take. Also, how well is the pump calibrated. 8 gallons to drive 300 miles is 37.5 mph. But 9 gallons for the same distance is 33.3 mpg.
 
If we were driving in a vacuum on flat smooth roads all the time, we could quickly figure the best way. But we have the real world to deal with.
 
We can develop our own Hypothesis, but the Scan Gauge will instantly reveal which speed and gear actually gets the better mileage, under present conditions.
 
Kip
 
  
#1869 of 2058
Re: Scan Gauge [kipk] by ruking1
Oct 31, 2008 (6:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Oct 31, 2008 2:50 am)

Keep down this kind of path and you will qualify to be Wayne Gerdes' wing man/woman.
#1870 of 2058
by kenlw
Oct 31, 2008 (6:41 am)
Reply
at 20k miles/yr; $3/gal; the annual savings of 38mpg over 35 mpg is $135. at $2.50/g it's a whopping $112/year savings.
 
I hope the scangage costs less than that.
#1871 of 2058
Re: [kenlw] by ruking1
Oct 31, 2008 (7:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: kenlw (Oct 31, 2008 6:41 am)

Well the scan gauge and hypermiling has always been another game. I am sure there is some education content, or some side story like Wayne's. Some folks like the hot cars. Others like to see how much over EPA they can do.

Messages Page 188 of 207
1
...
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
...
207
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement