Sign In Join 



Honda Civic Real World MPG

2058 messages,  Last post on Aug 26, 2009 at 6:19 PM

You are in the Honda Civic Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Civic, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 108 of 206
1
...
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
...
206
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1071 of 2058
Re: k & n intake system = better mpg????? [whitewolf] by ruking1
Aug 09, 2007 (9:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: whitewolf (Aug 09, 2007 9:33 am)

I would not agree!!
 
And, I would agree with the second point!
 
All one has to do is to look at the aftermarket products! (both intake and filter products) It is HUGE HUGE business!
 
In terms of filtering ability and so called "performance" for my .02 cents those products are not worth the asking prices.
 
The other is the concept of cold air vs engine compartment induction!!??
 
VW Jetta TDI designs a so called "cold air" induction; with removable snow snorkel (my term prophylatic). The snow snorkel has a (pre) screen and (from backwards to fowards) vents to the windstream via a protected area sheltered by plastic louvers. This is further prescreened by the screened portion of a front edged bra!! Still, after a cycle of 5,000 mile snow screen cleanings /100,000 miles or 20 cleanings, I am still amazed at how much debris/dirty is "prescreened" by the snow snorkel screen!!! If I took off the snow snorkel (or just the screen) all of this would dump into the bottom or dirty portion of the stock air box!! Of course the TDI is designed in such a way where the air flow is NOT impeded (aka gets ALL the air it needs, even with the snow snorkel) for a full charge of air! So it makes almost absolutely no sense (from a performance and filtering point of view) to do any modifications. I have also done a visual inspection by wiping the clean side of the air flow intake with a hot soapy water dampen white clean rag and there is literally no dust residue!!! To boot, I EXCEED the oem recommendation for air filter change by a min of 25% to 50%!!! I do a 50/60 k miles interval when 40,000 miles is oem recommended. But truly that is WAY conservative!!
 
I will grant the air induction system is BUTT ugly.However that is entirely a different issue, which aftermarket vendor address at steep prices!
#1072 of 2058
Re: k & n intake system = better mpg????? [whitewolf] by shipo
Aug 09, 2007 (10:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: whitewolf (Aug 09, 2007 9:33 am)

I don't believe that K&N makes any compete induction systems for cars, only air filtration devices and their associated housings and plumbing.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#1073 of 2058
one year update by rupnok1
Aug 09, 2007 (10:17 pm)
Reply
sorry to get off the track about air filters but wanted to submit one year's 'real world' mileage experience with my '06 civic LX coupe AT:
 
miles driven: 20328
total gallons used: 536.9
average MPG: 37.86
best tank MPG: 44.7
worst: 33.4
 
average conditions: daily ~50 mile commute DC metro area (speed completely variable from 60mph to stop and go), occasional 250 mile highway trips (72-78mi/h cruise control), a/c when needed, no mods. last 6 months tire pressures +3-5psi over doorjamb specs.
 
cheers,
 
-C.
#1074 of 2058
Re: one year update [rupnok1] by pat HOST
Aug 10, 2007 (3:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: rupnok1 (Aug 09, 2007 10:17 pm)

Actually, you're the one who's on track here. It's time we moved on. Thanks.
#1075 of 2058
New Civic Si Sedan- MPG by puzman
Aug 10, 2007 (5:13 am)
Reply
My daily commute is 2/3rds cruising around 50 on rural roads, then 70+ on freeway, then 5 mins or so of stop-and-go. First two tanks were during break-in (no trips above 5000 RPM):
 
27.5 mpg, 29 mpg
 
Third tank after break-in (at least one trip/day to redline), and overall more agressive driving : 27.5 mpg
All tanks were during heavy AC use. I think this is pretty impressive for a performance car. I imagine with less A/C use and less agressive driving, I could easily break 30 mpg.
#1076 of 2058
Re: k & n intake system = better mpg????? [shipo] by eldaino
Aug 10, 2007 (6:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Aug 09, 2007 10:24 am)

they make actual intakes, does that count as a full system?
#1077 of 2058
Re: Mineral oil $106.24 VS $12.26 per gal, which would you buy? [ruking1] by eldaino
Aug 10, 2007 (6:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Aug 09, 2007 7:21 am)

sorry i'll pass on the mineral oil.
#1078 of 2058
Re: k & n intake system = better mpg????? [eldaino] by shipo
Aug 10, 2007 (10:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: eldaino (Aug 10, 2007 6:46 am)

No, K&N does not make any full intake systems; all they make is the filter, the filter housing and the necessary plumbing to fit the filtration device to your car.
 
I suggest that before we raise the ire of our hosts any further, we put a lid on this discussion, and if necessary, continue it over in the "Gas Saving Gizmos & Gadgets" discussion.
 
rjlee, "Gas Saving Gizmos & Gadgets" #1, 6 Sep 2001 2:50 pm
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#1079 of 2058
Re: New Civic Si Sedan- MPG [puzman] by rupnok1
Aug 10, 2007 (11:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: puzman (Aug 10, 2007 5:13 am)

in my world a/c seems to drop mileage by ~2mpg...
#1080 of 2058
Re: k & n intake system = better mpg????? [shipo] by pat HOST
Aug 10, 2007 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Aug 10, 2007 10:59 am)

Thanks for the link!

Messages Page 108 of 206
1
...
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
...
206
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement