Sign In Join 



Honda Odyssey Real World MPG

491 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 7:32 PM

You are in the Honda Odyssey Forum. Your Host is Karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Odyssey, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Van


Messages Page 42 of 50
1
...
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
...
50
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#406 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [watsac] by thegraduate
Aug 08, 2008 (3:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: watsac (Aug 08, 2008 2:08 pm)

What more fuel-efficient vehicle did you get? I'm curious...
#407 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [thegraduate] by watsac
Aug 09, 2008 (3:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 08, 2008 3:11 pm)

I bought 2 vehicles this year (one to replace my wife's Odyssey and 1 additional for my daughter to use at school):
 
2008 Toyota RAV4 LTD V6 w/AT - EPA 19/26 - I am getting combined 20 MPG (95% CITY). I know the EPA numbers for the RAV4 are not that much better than the '02 Odyssey's but at least I am able to achieve the EPA numbers with the RAV4. The '02 Odyssey never came close to its EPA numbers no matter what I did. And forget the dealer helping; they just brush it off.
 
2008 Honda Fit base model w/AT - EPA 27/34 - don't have good stats yet on this one because I just ran the ILP reset and need to accumulate some mileage.
#408 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [watsac] by thegraduate
Aug 09, 2008 (7:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: watsac (Aug 09, 2008 3:50 am)

2008 Toyota RAV4 LTD V6 w/AT - EPA 19/26 - I am getting combined 20 MPG (95% CITY). I know the EPA numbers for the RAV4 are not that much better than the '02 Odyssey's but at least I am able to achieve the EPA numbers with the RAV4. The '02 Odyssey never came close to its EPA numbers no matter what I did. And forget the dealer helping; they just brush it off.
 
The EPA numbers for the RAV4 are actually 3 MPG higher than those in the Odyssey (which has 16/23 when using the new EPA rating system that your RAV is measured with). So, you are getting approx. 3 MPG better with the RAV than you were with the Odyssey. You aren't doing much better compared with the EPA than you were in the Odyssey.
 
For those who didn't know, the EPA rating system was revised for 2008, sending all estimates down by a sometimes-substantial margin. For example, the Odyssey had been rated 18/25, but was revised to 16/23. The RAV4 V6 4WD had been rated 21/28 but was revised down to 19/26. Your new Honda Fit? It was previously rated 31/37 but has been reduced to 27/34 thanks to the new system.
 
So, in reality, it seems to simply be your driving style or commute that is bringing your mileage down. You are getting the same numbers (relatively, approximately 1 MPG below the old EPA estimates for City) or approximately 1 MPG above the new EPA estimates for City) in both of the vehicles. The Odyssey really wasn't any less accurate than your new RAV when compared to the EPA.
 
All that being said, the RAV is a terrific vehicle if you don't need the space efficiency of a minivan. That V6 is a real powerhouse and gets great economy. I just wanted to clarify the EPA ratings issue, and show that Honda really didn't do any worse relative to the EPA ratings than the Toyota.
#409 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [thegraduate] by bobber1
Aug 09, 2008 (10:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 09, 2008 7:04 am)

I still think it's amazing the Honda gets the mileage it does when you consider it weighs almost 3 tons. I've gotten as high as 28 mpg with it on the highway and most mid size SUV"s struggle to get much over 20. The RAV should get better mileage. It weighs over 1,200 pounds less.
#410 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [bobber1] by watsac
Aug 09, 2008 (2:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bobber1 (Aug 09, 2008 10:42 am)

I've consistently gotten 27 MPG on the HIGHWAY with the RAV (a number I NEVER saw on the Odyssey). The RAV just seems to be a bit thirstier in that CITY traffic (but still drinks less than the Odyssey).
#411 of 491
Trip in 2006 Odyssey EX by roberts5
Aug 09, 2008 (4:37 pm)
Reply
We just got back from a 1645 mile trip trhough WV and OH from VA. I wish there was more torque to climb the long I-77 upgrades. We had a heavy load with five people plus luggage (1100 lbs.). I cruised between 65-75 mph. The mileage figured between 23-24 mpg on each tank. I also noticed the drivers seat a little rough on the lower back regardless of the lumbar ajustment. The kids traveled pretty well since they had movies to enjoy. Overall it was a positive experience except for the accident just South of Charleston, WV which added six hours to the trip home.
#412 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [bobber1] by thegraduate
Aug 09, 2008 (10:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bobber1 (Aug 09, 2008 10:42 am)

I still think it's amazing the Honda gets the mileage it does when you consider it weighs almost 3 tons. I've gotten as high as 28 mpg with it on the highway and most mid size SUV"s struggle to get much over 20. The RAV should get better mileage. It weighs over 1,200 pounds less.
 
The Honda weighs just over 2 tons, not "almost 3 tons." ~4,200 lbs doesn't come close to 3 tons, in my mind.
 
The RAV doesn't weigh 1,200 lbs less. The 2002 Odyssey weighs about 4,250 lbs. The 2008 RAV4 weighs about 3,500 lbs.
#413 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [thegraduate] by bobber1
Aug 10, 2008 (6:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 09, 2008 10:12 pm)

According to Edumunds the total weigh of the Honda Odyssey is 5,795 pounds and the Toyota RAV is 4,473. Curb weight for the Honda is 4,430 and for the Toyota is 3,375. By my math that's a 1,322 different in total and 1,055 in curb weight.If you average the two you come up with 1,188(okay I overstated it by 12 pounds..)
#414 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [bobber1] by thegraduate
Aug 10, 2008 (1:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bobber1 (Aug 10, 2008 6:35 am)

According to Edumunds the total weigh of the Honda Odyssey is 5,795 pounds and the Toyota RAV is 4,473....By my math that's a 1,322 different in total and 1,055 in curb weight.If you average the two you come up with 1,188(okay I overstated it by 12 pounds..)
 
Whoa whoa whoa.... the Edmunds weight you are listing is the GVWR - the total weight of the car PLUS the total payload it can handle. That is NOT what you should be measuring. You should use curb weight as your guide.
 
A 2002 Odyssey weighs 4,250, a 2008 2WD RAV4 weighs just under 3,500 lbs.
 
You didn't have a current Odyssey (which weighs what you state here at 4,430), you should be using the weight of the previous model (2002 falls into this category).
#415 of 491
Re: 2002 Honda Odyssey EX-L [thegraduate] by bobber1
Aug 10, 2008 (2:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 10, 2008 1:19 pm)

My point is that the Honda is heavier than the Toyota and I believe that point still holds water.
 
Curb weight vs. actual weight loaded is a good question. Which should you use? I think most people drive around with people and object loaded in the vehicle.

Messages Page 42 of 50
1
...
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
...
50
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement