Sign In Join 



Honda CR-V Real World MPG

777 messages,  Last post on Nov 03, 2009 at 2:32 PM

You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda CR-V, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV

Your Community Leader is varmint.


Messages Page 75 of 79
1
...
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#735 of 777
31 on highway by jenk2649
Sep 02, 2008 (9:05 am)
Reply
New 2008 CRV 2WD
 
Around town: 22 MPG
HIghway travel going 70: 31 MPG
 
Much better than my 2005 Pilot, which got 15-16 around town and 18-19 highway.
#736 of 777
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [thegraduate] by dpp8f
Sep 19, 2008 (2:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Jul 16, 2008 7:49 am)

It is a logical fallacy to assume that just because a car is achieving mileage in-line with that of other drivers on the highway that everything must be just fine with the car in city/stop&go driving. It simply does not follow, and it ignores the many variables affecting why mileage could vary between the two scenarios (including especially computer settings that dynamically adjust as the car is operated in different ways--in fact, when the Honda tech downloads data from the car, there are specific computed numbers indicating operation under highway and stop/go driving).
 
Sadly, this issue has nothing to do with tire pressure, though I certainly wish it were that simple and easy to correct.
 
I have extensively searched the Internet, and I can find no other driver reporting the 14-17mpg that I and my unfortunate colleague from San Francisco are getting. These numbers fall outside the large range for city driving provided by Honda and processed and occasionally verified by EPA (see the Final Rule published in December 2006 governing the new test methodologies). City mileage this low could only be explained by either (1) driving uphill both ways with six passengers and tons of cargo with the A/C on and an ambient temp of 40 degrees or less and the tires half full or (2) there is something incorrectly adjusted or not operating properly in the car.
 
Are there any other ideas out there?
 
There are
#737 of 777
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [dpp8f] by stevedebi
Sep 22, 2008 (1:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dpp8f (Sep 19, 2008 2:04 pm)

"Are there any other ideas out there? "
 
My CR-V was a 2003, but driving up and down hills would approximate to less than 18 MPG in my experience. The CR-V has "hill grade logic" that uses the transmission to hold speed downhill, which will use gas. Going uphill, especially accelerating, uses LOTS of gas. Your CR-V weighs over 3500 lbs, and it REALLY hurts MPG to accelerate, and REALLY REALLY hurts MPG to accelerated uphill. The engine is small, and it compensates by going into the HIGH RPM (and high gas useage) when extra power is needed - like going up hill.
 
I'm sorry for your experience, but it doesn't sound like the CR-V is broken. You have a tough driving cycle for the Honda CR-V design.
 
My driving was in LA, but if I pushed the CR-V it would return 18 MPG. My normal was 21 MPG, but that was very carefully accelerating, planning for stop lights, etc.
#738 of 777
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [stevedebi] by dpp8f
Oct 06, 2008 (7:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Sep 22, 2008 1:56 pm)

Please check my original postm and you will see that I actually am driving around the coastal plain of LA. It is very flat, and I am being very careful accelerating, planning for stop lights, stop signs, **anything** that will affect mileage. Based on this, I would expect to achieve your 21 MPG. Instead, I am still averaging about 15.8 MPG (my initial post was a reply to the poor fellow who is getting 14.5 mpg in San Francisco--seems his car is affected by the same defect as mine).
 
Hondas are great cars, but no enterprise of that magnitude can get 100 percent of their products perfect. My previous two cars were a 1989 Prelude Si and a 1994 Civic Si and I consistently beat the old over-inflated EPA mileage estimates in both cars (and in conditions flat, hilly, and in between).
#739 of 777
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [dpp8f] by stevedebi
Oct 07, 2008 (12:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dpp8f (Oct 06, 2008 7:32 pm)

"Please check my original postm and you will see that I actually am driving around the coastal plain of LA. It is very flat, and I am being very careful accelerating, planning for stop lights, stop signs, **anything** that will affect mileage. "
 
Sorry, I saw one of your subsequent posts, and thought that you were in San Francisco.
 
One thing I found with my 2003 was that I needed a brisk acceleration up to speed, rather than a slow acceleration. Slow acceleration used more gas. So I found that a steady acceleration was better. Try setting it to around 2000 = 2200 RPM until up to speed. THEN try and stay at speed.
 
All vehicles get better mileage when they are coasting, so try and plan for those stops. Speaking of which, are your trips perhaps very short (5 miles or so)? That kills MPG as well.
 
Another thing to try is changing brands of gasoline, and stay with a brand for several months.
 
The worst I ever saw was 18, and that was hot-dogging the accelerator.
 
Your CR-V has more gears than mine had, so you should be doing better than a 2003.
#740 of 777
First impressions by zheka
Oct 22, 2008 (1:22 pm)
Reply
I put 2.6k miles on my new '08 CR-V LX AWD over the last 4 weeks. Honda's mpg estimates seem to be pretty accurate for the average driving style.
 
BTW, CR-Vs now sell for invoice or slightly below, so may be a good time to buy
 
I usually average 20mpg in the city and 25-26 mpg highway. If I drive feathering the gas pedal, I get 22.5 city and 27 highway, but that temps the cars behind me to use their horns.
On the several highway trips through hilly northeast, having the criuse control at 67mph for the entire tank gave me 27.5mpg. At 74mph for the whole tank, I got around 26.2mpg . I also tried runnig at 62mph, which gave me 28.5mpg, but I could not take driving that slow for more than 95 miles.
 
The computer estimate of average mpg has been very accurate, but a little optimistic, showing about 0.5 - 0.8 mpg over the real figures.
 
I also noticed the oil quality display drops by 10% every 1200 miles or so.
 
I'll do an update when I get 10k+ on the car.
#741 of 777
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [dpp8f] by nippononly
Nov 08, 2008 (11:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: dpp8f (Oct 06, 2008 7:32 pm)

SF is a town where traffic is stop and go almost everywhere, every block has either a stop light or a stop sign, and the hills are so steep that some older cars can't go up them at all.
 
If one were to combine that with lots of short trips where the engine is running cold as often as it is running hot, it wouldn't be surprising at all to achieve only 14.5 mpg, especially in a model with such a large 4-cylinder as the CRV has.
 
Your last two cars had much smaller 4-cylinder engines, so they would be bound to do a lot better if a lot of your driving is in town, especially if it is mostly short trips (5 miles or less).
#742 of 777
2008 crv ex awd by niteflite888
Nov 10, 2008 (2:47 pm)
Reply
at around 400 miles now, overall mpg is 23.5 with 300 of the 400 miles on highway. will it get any better?
#743 of 777
Re: 2008 crv ex awd [niteflite888] by bobby12
Nov 10, 2008 (6:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: niteflite888 (Nov 10, 2008 2:47 pm)

Hi niteflite,
I seriously doubt it. My best mileage was during the first 1,000 miles, even with switching to full synthetic and duralube additive. I'm getting about what you did with 30,000 miles now. Also listen for clicking in the rearend on turns. I was warned and, sure enough, have just had to have the clutches burnished and new fluid in the rear end, under the warrenty.
#744 of 777
Re: 2008 crv ex awd [niteflite888] by kipk
Nov 11, 2008 (5:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: niteflite888 (Nov 10, 2008 2:47 pm)

overall mpg is 23.5 with 300 of the 400 miles on highway. will it get any better
 
Your mileage will depend a lot on your driving style, load, terrain and traffic conditions.
I consistantly get 2-4 more mpg in our 03 CR-V than my wife does, under the same conditions. .
 
Keep in mind that high speeds produce more wind resistance and burns more fuel, Also every time you touch the brake and the pressure and duration of that touch indicates you just did or are about to waste some fuel.
 
Kip

Messages Page 75 of 79
1
...
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement