Sign In Join 



Honda CR-V Real World MPG

786 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 3:53 AM

You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda CR-V, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV

Your Community Leader is varmint.


Messages Page 74 of 79
1
...
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#728 of 786
Re: Pushed Hard [thegraduate] by blueiedgod
Aug 12, 2008 (10:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 11, 2008 9:57 am)

The CRV ran great except for dead pan acceleration response in passing situations on 2 lane roads. It's okay, just allow for plenty of safety margin in the opposite lane and click off the A/C during those critical flat-out moments.
  
If you push the throttle hard, the A/C compressor will cut out automatically to give you maximum power until you back off the throttle; no need to push the button.

 
Yeap, OP was not pushing CR-V hard enough. The A/C cuts out when the engine is pushed. Don't be affraid to rev that puppy. It is made to rev.
#729 of 786
Re: Pushed Hard [blueiedgod] by thegraduate
Aug 14, 2008 (7:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: blueiedgod (Aug 12, 2008 10:59 am)

Right; you're talking about an engine whose maximum horsepower comes on at 5,800 RPM. Wind it up, it won't hurt it!
#730 of 786
Re: Pushed Hard [thegraduate] by 10years
Aug 14, 2008 (4:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 14, 2008 7:39 am)

Graduate and Blue,
 Thanks for tip about the automatic A/C cut out at full acceleration, I’ll try it out. Doing the manual A/C shut off in crunch passing situations is an old habit of mine that goes way back. Fangled techo-gadets Oh Yeah, I revved the heck out of it, to the floor boards, on most of those passing occasions. Reflecting back I believe the dead pan passing acceleration could be attributed to:
1. 900 pounds of passengers and baggage.
2.High altitudes.
3.85 Octane fuel dispensed in that beautiful Big Sky country.
 
The CR-V is the wife’s and she averages about 23 MPG year round running around town and work. It can vary a couple either way depending on seasons. Normal Highway MPG for us is in the 26-28 range with 87 Octane fuel.
#731 of 786
Pleasant surprise by mjb56
Aug 16, 2008 (5:56 pm)
Reply
We had just bought a very nice, used CR-V. 2000 SE with 113K mi. The first full tank of fuel with about a 40/60 mix of city/hwy driving yielded 26.3 mpg. We did drive the speed limit and tried to maximize the mileage but at that point it was probably achieving at least 28 mpg on the highway. I had previously owned a 99 EX, bought new and don't remember getting more than 25 hwy. at that time. Maybe it just wasn't completely broken in. Probably needed the first 100k just to loosen up enough.
#732 of 786
Re: Pleasant surprise [mjb56] by thegraduate
Aug 17, 2008 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: mjb56 (Aug 16, 2008 5:56 pm)

Congrats!
 
Was your previous CR-V 4WD? Is this one?
#733 of 786
Re: Pleasant surprise [thegraduate] by mjb56
Aug 17, 2008 (12:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 17, 2008 7:25 am)

Yes to both. This one just had the major maintenance package done, including plugs. Runs extremely well and is virtually mint, other than the high mileage which hasn't seemed to affect things much. There's a little bit of rust on the inside bottoms of two of the doors which will be repaired this coming week. It was a lucky find, to say the least.
#734 of 786
got 28.1 MPG on a recent trip by adam74
Aug 26, 2008 (6:10 am)
Reply
Just completed a 800 miles trip to niagara falls from New Jersey on my 2008 CR-V. While going I was doing 60 to 65 mph and got 29.7 miles per gallon. while coming back doing 70 to 75 mph. overall MPG 28.1. Satisfied with CR-V's MPG.
#735 of 786
31 on highway by jenk2649
Sep 02, 2008 (9:05 am)
Reply
New 2008 CRV 2WD
 
Around town: 22 MPG
HIghway travel going 70: 31 MPG
 
Much better than my 2005 Pilot, which got 15-16 around town and 18-19 highway.
#736 of 786
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [thegraduate] by dpp8f
Sep 19, 2008 (2:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Jul 16, 2008 7:49 am)

It is a logical fallacy to assume that just because a car is achieving mileage in-line with that of other drivers on the highway that everything must be just fine with the car in city/stop&go driving. It simply does not follow, and it ignores the many variables affecting why mileage could vary between the two scenarios (including especially computer settings that dynamically adjust as the car is operated in different ways--in fact, when the Honda tech downloads data from the car, there are specific computed numbers indicating operation under highway and stop/go driving).
 
Sadly, this issue has nothing to do with tire pressure, though I certainly wish it were that simple and easy to correct.
 
I have extensively searched the Internet, and I can find no other driver reporting the 14-17mpg that I and my unfortunate colleague from San Francisco are getting. These numbers fall outside the large range for city driving provided by Honda and processed and occasionally verified by EPA (see the Final Rule published in December 2006 governing the new test methodologies). City mileage this low could only be explained by either (1) driving uphill both ways with six passengers and tons of cargo with the A/C on and an ambient temp of 40 degrees or less and the tires half full or (2) there is something incorrectly adjusted or not operating properly in the car.
 
Are there any other ideas out there?
 
There are
#737 of 786
Re: 14.5 mpg in SF [dpp8f] by stevedebi
Sep 22, 2008 (1:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dpp8f (Sep 19, 2008 2:04 pm)

"Are there any other ideas out there? "
 
My CR-V was a 2003, but driving up and down hills would approximate to less than 18 MPG in my experience. The CR-V has "hill grade logic" that uses the transmission to hold speed downhill, which will use gas. Going uphill, especially accelerating, uses LOTS of gas. Your CR-V weighs over 3500 lbs, and it REALLY hurts MPG to accelerate, and REALLY REALLY hurts MPG to accelerated uphill. The engine is small, and it compensates by going into the HIGH RPM (and high gas useage) when extra power is needed - like going up hill.
 
I'm sorry for your experience, but it doesn't sound like the CR-V is broken. You have a tough driving cycle for the Honda CR-V design.
 
My driving was in LA, but if I pushed the CR-V it would return 18 MPG. My normal was 21 MPG, but that was very carefully accelerating, planning for stop lights, etc.

Messages Page 74 of 79
1
...
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement