Sign In Join 



Honda CR-V Real World MPG

777 messages,  Last post on Nov 03, 2009 at 2:32 PM

You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda CR-V, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV

Your Community Leader is varmint.


Messages Page 30 of 79
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#285 of 777
Re: 2007 CRV low mpg [lawros] by kipk
Dec 20, 2006 (2:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: lawros (Dec 19, 2006 2:38 pm)

Was the 91 Accord wagon still been getting 26 mpg.?
 
Just asking that because I know that we tend to check mileage on new vehicles and once established we kind of let it slide, but use that original as reference.
 
How similar are the 91 Accord and the 07 CR-V?
 
Keep in mind the CR-V is heavier, less aerodynamic, AWD, larger engine, more HP, AT where the Accord may have been MT..
 
Also traffic conditions change. A town near us is 11 miles. I don't believe there were any traffic lights between our town and that one in 1990. Now there are 12-13 depending on destination. We still say it's 10 minutes away. Actually it's more like 20+.
 
Our old '82ish 1500cc AT Civic wagon averaged 30-32 mpg day in and day out as I drove it loaded with 200+# parts as an outside service rep for IBM.
 
A Dodge Colt 1600 8Spd MT averaged 35+ mpg under similar conditions. 40+ at posted limits on the road.
 
A Mitsubishi Montero 5 spd, MT, 4WD, 2600cc (I think) got 16 mpg under same conditions. 14-15 if there was much traffic. 18 highway.
 
My wife gets 21-23 local driving and 27+/- highway in her 03 AT AWD CR-V. I get 2-3 better driving her car, same conditions. 25-31 for me!
 
Give your car a chance to break in. Remember that cold engines burn more gas.
 
Hang in there, ya done good!
 
Kip
#286 of 777
Re: 2007 CRV low mpg [kipk] by lawros
Dec 20, 2006 (2:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: kipk (Dec 20, 2006 2:21 am)

Yes, the 91 wagon was still getting 25 - we traded it in against the new CRV. And, yes, the wagon and CRV are different cars, but the promoted mileage is still 22 to 28 and most people on this website have been reporting very good mileage. My wife and I both get similar mileage on the car. The dealership also said "let the car break in for a couple of thousand miles". Nevertheless, others on this site haven't had to do that. Could there be some kind of drag from the emergency brake or an engine problem of some type? We'll be doing some highway driving right after Xmas - maybe that will tell us something more.
#287 of 777
Re: 2007 CRV low mpg [lawros] by coda72
Dec 20, 2006 (5:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: lawros (Dec 20, 2006 2:52 am)

I have a 2006 which has just under 3,000 miles on it now, and I kind of was thinking my gas mileage was low at a consistent 22 mpg, but I guess that's not too bad compared to 18 mpg. If my gas mileage were that low, I would definitely make the dealer check it out.
#288 of 777
2005 EX manual by blueiedgod
Dec 20, 2006 (12:37 pm)
Reply
Just drove 380 miles from Washington, DC to Buffalo, NY. 27 mpg average according to the Scangauge. The range is 4 mpg (6500 RPM, lol) to 250 mpg (idle down hill in neutral)
#289 of 777
Re: 2007 CRV low mpg [lawros] by phisher
Dec 20, 2006 (1:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lawros (Dec 19, 2006 2:38 pm)

if the 07 is like the 06 MPG will be more representative of what you'll average after 750 mile when the engine breaks in.
#290 of 777
MPG update on my new 2006 by thestormer
Dec 21, 2006 (5:36 pm)
Reply
I am the one who got terrible MPG on my 2005 EX.
 
I got a 2006 SE two weeks ago and just hit 500 miles.
 
So far, with 60% city and 40% highway, I've gotten 15.8 MPG city and 22.1 MPG highway, for an average of 17.47 MPG.
 
I know I need to "break" the car in, but this is extremely frustrating and disappointing already. I really hope the numbers improve over time.
#291 of 777
2007 crv LX first 500 miles by 1crvman
Dec 21, 2006 (6:58 pm)
Reply
First fill was 24.5 mpg, 2nd fill just under 27 mpg mostly interstate at 70mph or a bit faster(me driving) or slower(wife driving). Lot better that the '01 Tribute we traded for the CRV which had barely managed 21 mpg on same trip - but my 330ix BMW does 27mpg on same interstate trip (70 -75mph) and basically 19mpg around town, not bad for a six cylinder autobox that goes like skunk! I attribute BMW's mileage to aerodynamics and run flat tires that have those stiff sidewalls.
Too bad Ford/Mazda(Tribute)couldn't achieve better mileage as the basic design is sound but as usual after 6 years ownership the typical domestic problems arise which I'm sure won't present itself in the Honda. This is our 5th Honda over the last 24 years.
#292 of 777
Re: MPG update on my new 2006 [thestormer] by coda72
Dec 22, 2006 (5:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: thestormer (Dec 21, 2006 5:36 pm)

That's strange that you're getting that low of gas mileage on 2 different CR-Vs. What are your driving habits like? I have to admit, I'm pretty hard on mine. I tend to accelerate hard and go fast when I can, and I still manage 22 mpg in 80% city/suburb driving and 20% highway. I've consistently gotten this gas mileage even before the break in was complete. I now have 2600 miles on it. I don't know why you would be getting such low gas mileage.
 
By the way, how do you calculate your gas mileage? And how can you know what gas mileage your getting in each driving condition? I calculate gas mileage each time after filling the tank and can only estimate the total gas mileage, not for each driving condition.
#293 of 777
Re: MPG update on my new 2006 [coda72] by thestormer
Dec 22, 2006 (10:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: coda72 (Dec 22, 2006 5:04 am)

Being totally subjective, of course, I tend to think I don't drive my cars "hard". I don't accelerate hard or fast and I try to anticipate braking and do so gently whenever possible. As I mentioned in an earlier post (#273), I don't get complaints from passengers.
 
When I got my new vehicle, it had a full tank of gas. I drove mostly city miles until my first fill-up. So I divided the number of gallons it took to fill the tank by the number of miles I drove up to that point.
 
After my first fill-up, I took a little road trip. It was mostly highway. While I was on the trip, I topped off the tank. I divided the number of gallons it took to fill the tank by the number of miles I had driven since the last fill-up.
 
That's how I was able to gauge the city vs. highway MPG.
 
Again, I really hope the numbers improve.
#294 of 777
Re: MPG update on my new 2006 [thestormer] by stevedebi
Dec 22, 2006 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: thestormer (Dec 22, 2006 10:54 am)

"When I got my new vehicle, it had a full tank of gas. I drove mostly city miles until my first fill-up. So I divided the number of gallons it took to fill the tank by the number of miles I drove up to that point.
  
After my first fill-up, I took a little road trip. It was mostly highway. While I was on the trip, I topped off the tank. I divided the number of gallons it took to fill the tank by the number of miles I had driven since the last fill-up."
 
1. The dealer might not have filled the tank completely - disregard that tank.
 
2. You really need to take the tank almost all the way to "E" to get an accurate MPG. Shorter trips leave too much possibility of putting in more or less gas, and the smaller mileage driven enhances the possibility that the MPG will be wrong.

Messages Page 30 of 79
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement