Sign In Join 



Honda CR-V Real World MPG

777 messages,  Last post on Nov 03, 2009 at 2:32 PM

You are in the Honda CR-V Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Honda CR-V, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV

Your Community Leader is varmint.


Messages Page 29 of 79
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#274 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [thestormer] by terry92270
Dec 08, 2006 (3:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: thestormer (Dec 08, 2006 2:09 am)

Goodness...maybe late at night, people switch off their sense of humor! Those of us married, are unable to proceed without heat or AC, under penalty of being maimed.
 
I tend to be a bit of a smart-ass, just ignore it, when in doubt.
 
The AC unit needs to be run at least every other month or so, for around 5 minutes, in order for the internal lubrication to be moved around. Without doing so, you risk the seals drying out, and a big, very expensive repair job. I have never heard of not using either the heat or AC bringing on longer life, but just the opposite. Running the heater, opening the flow of hot coolant into the heater core, actually inhibits rust.
 
AC reduces your MPG by about .5 to 1 MPG. Running with the windows down when its hot, adds drag to the car, and reduces your MPG by about the same. Think of those pictures you've seen of a wind tunnel, and the slip stream going around/over the vehicle. They are designed with aerodynamics in mind, windows up. With them open, its much like the drag a parachute creates. So please start using them, and enjoy all of the creature comforts you paid dearly for!
#275 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [terry92270] by thestormer
Dec 08, 2006 (3:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: terry92270 (Dec 08, 2006 3:21 am)

I do have a sense of humor. I guess your first comment about me buying a "new" 2006 seemed a bit sarcastic and set the tone. There are actually still a few of them left! I just don't like the look of the 2007 and I also don't like the way the tailgate opens (up).
I had a 2005 and I loved it. Unfortunately, it got totaled when I hit a red light runner. I figured I'd go out and get myself something close to what I had. As it turns out, I'm going from a 2005 EX to a 2006 SE and getting it at a lower price. My payout from the insurance company was actually higher than the price paid for the 2005. I made out on that deal.
I didn't say I never use the A/C or heater. I just don't use them 24/7. I also never use either until the car is "warmed up". I've heard that owners of cars with high mileage credit this "waiting" with their car lasting longer.
I've never been able to afford a good new car, so I've been driving crappy used cars most of my adult life. I was fortunate to win my 2005, and I'm extremely grateful. I just want the car to last as long as possible, and I'll do whatever I can to achieve that. When I found out the MPG on the 2005 EX was estimated at 22-25, I was happy enough. My average of 17 is extremely disappointing and I was just trying to figure out what could be causing such a low number.
When the car was totaled it had 8645 miles on it (in 15 months). Some people have suggested that I never actually broke it in and that could explain the low MPG. But, I still don't understand how it could be so low, and I didn't foresee that a drastic improvement was possible after breaking it in. I'm just hoping the 2006 will perform better.
#276 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [thestormer] by drive62
Dec 08, 2006 (5:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: thestormer (Dec 07, 2006 9:51 pm)

If you are really getting that low of mileage in your '05 CR-V there could be a problem. That's one reason one should keep track of mileage, it's a great indicator of problems.
 
However, if your mpg always was low (I think that's what you said) and you've dropped a couple more mpg it really may be your driving style. The CR-V is a brick and in stop and go traffic it's mileage will be low. And it will be even lower in winter. Either way, if the vehicle is still be under warranty I'd have it checked before I traded an almost new vehicle.
#277 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [drive62] by thestormer
Dec 08, 2006 (6:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: drive62 (Dec 08, 2006 5:31 am)

Thanks for the advice, but I'm not trading it. It was totaled in an accident two weeks ago.
 
I will keep your advice in mind if I have the same issue with my new CR-V. Thank you.
#278 of 777
Re: 2007 CRV just bought and took a short road trip [al63017] by gpolt
Dec 08, 2006 (9:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: al63017 (Nov 14, 2006 8:06 am)

AL63017, Curious as to your impressions of the Highlander compared to your new CRV (mpg, comfort, wind-road noise; was the HL awd or fwd?). Also, did you consider the new RAV4-V6? Thanks.
#279 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [thestormer] by biker4
Dec 08, 2006 (12:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thestormer (Dec 07, 2006 9:51 pm)

I drive about 85% city/suburbs and 15% highway.
 
Regardless of your driving ability that ratio will always result in poor millage especially if those city/suburbs millage are of the short barely-warmed up engine vareity.
#280 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [biker4] by terry92270
Dec 08, 2006 (1:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: biker4 (Dec 08, 2006 12:17 pm)

"Poor" as compared to what? A Hybrid?
#281 of 777
Re: 2007 CRV just bought and took a short road trip [gpolt] by al63017
Dec 08, 2006 (7:25 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gpolt (Dec 08, 2006 9:50 am)

HL was awd, a little more quiet, 16-17 mpg with 01' V-6, more plush and Lexus like. CRV is more sporty handling, 29-30 mpg on pure highway and about 25mpg 60 hwy/40 city.
Owned a 01 Rav 4 also more plush than 2000 crv I had but 07 CRV is real upgrade from 2000 CRV. In St. Louis you might need awd once every 5 years so have not really made that a priority but you would get most of your money back if you bought 4wd.
I very well may buy a HL again but wanted all the safety features 07 crv offered that 2001 HL did not have.
I like the CRV a bunch but HL would be fine I am sure as well as RAV 4 but did not really like the 07 RAV4.
 
I also own a Acura TSX and it seems like there is something about the way a Honda steers and rides that I tend to like.
HL and RAV 4 were great cars so duhhhhhhhhh you can't go wrong with either one. I just can't really say anything bad about either one other than HL 2001 mpg was not what I wanted when gas goes to $4.00 a gallon again. Also had Honda Pilot and that also was great vehicle that consistently got 20mpg fwd only. It seemed much bigger than HL.
Also had Murano which I may have liked better than any of them but put so many miles on cars that I trade in less than two years. Just would not want same car back to back.
Murano was a great car also and avg about 20 mpg at best, fwd only. I have never felt I had to have fwd instead of awd had not hurt me in the least when I traded. I have access to dealer auction site so I can see what dealers are paying or selling cars for on National basis and I have always gotten very close or more than these averages. Use Kelly blue book some times but they I think are always low and NADA seems to be high sometimes. But all of this my opinion only.
 
So don't think you can make a mistake with either one. I find the CRV 4cyl power to actually be pretty zippy when needed. hope it helps
#282 of 777
Re: 2005 CR-V EX AWD AT [thestormer] by saabgirl
Dec 08, 2006 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thestormer (Dec 07, 2006 9:51 pm)

My last three fill-ups equate to: 469 miles, 33.083 gallons, for 14.176 MPG
 
Did your vehicle spend a lot of time idling, which would contribute zero mpg to your gas average? Or is there any chance of some out-of-the-box problem? Like a dragging emergency brake? A fuel leak? A phantom siphoner? Hope your new ride treats your wallet better.
#283 of 777
2007 CRV low mpg by lawros
Dec 19, 2006 (2:38 pm)
Reply
Unfortunately, we are owners of an 07 AWD EX who have experienced pretty poor mpg. Granted we have not been doing any appreciable highway driving, but our mileage has been about 18 in the first 750 miles on the car. No, we don't speed away from lights, etc., and we got about 26 mpg average on our old '91 Accord wagon. My question is: Is there anything mechanical in the car that would explain this kind of difference from the "expected" mileage?

Messages Page 29 of 79
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
79
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement