Sign In Join 



Honda Accord Real World MPG

2672 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM

You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Accord, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 172 of 268
1
...
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
...
268
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1704 of 2672
Re: - [ezshift5] by ljgbjg
Apr 11, 2008 (8:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: ezshift5 (Apr 11, 2008 7:07 am)

Wow - stumbled onto a hornet's nest of problems with 2007 6 speed 2-3 shift when I looked into the Series 7 6 speed fuel economy. Sorry to read that. My faith in Honda engineering continues to be eroded. That problem is unacceptable and inexcusable for a service manager to call "normal". Maybe when there was no such thing as syncromesh! The gall! Good luck to you guys. Honda had better start heeding their loyall customers or they won't have any any more.
#1705 of 2672
MPG on 2008 Honda Accord LX Automatic by mazda6dude
Apr 11, 2008 (8:28 am)
Reply
My mpg average for the first 1000 miles has been 30MPG. Following is a break down:
374 miles on 12.90 gallons
424 miles on 13.61 gallons
200 miles on 6.70 gallons
#1706 of 2672
Best Ever MPG by tallman1
Apr 12, 2008 (12:11 pm)
Reply
I just returned from a 400 mile trip. Southeastern Oregon to Western Washington. Over a 5000 ft. mountain pass in 30-40 degree temps. Warming to the 50's the last few hours. I kept the speed to 65 and under for the most part. A couple of stops but very little city driving.
 
The results: 41.7 mpg, the best ever in my 06 Accord EX-L I4 manual.
 
The 08 I4 numbers continue to interest me. I wonder how well I'd do. In over 44,000 miles in my 06, I've only had 8 tanks below 30 mpg, all in the winter. 29.5, 29.9, 28.0, 29.8, 28.4, 29.7, 29.8, 29.9.
 
 
#1707 of 2672
Re: WHAT ARE U GETTING on 2008 V6 w/VCM [ljgbjg] by parviz
Apr 13, 2008 (6:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ljgbjg (Apr 07, 2008 6:39 am)

You are correct, it is supposed to hold 18.5, I stop fueling when it clicks the first time so it should have very close to that. Now for the MPG you come up with using the 460 miles, that is more than my 400 mile freeway trip and includes city mileage, hence lowering the overall MPG. My overall MPG on the car for the entire past 4 months is still at 24.2 MPG.
#1708 of 2672
Re: WHAT ARE U GETTING on 2008 V6 w/VCM [ljgbjg] by parviz
Apr 13, 2008 (6:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ljgbjg (Apr 07, 2008 6:46 am)

One should take the trip computer reading within the context that it is intended for. The rational for your example is that when you are in city streets burning more gas the computer estimates the "range" (remaining miles) based on the current gas usage. You would get a different range with the same amount of gas in the tank if you moved to a freeway quick and started cruising at about 65 mph. I have been checking the computer readout with my own calcs doing the old fashion way and it is really close, not withstanding the caveat I mentioned earlier.
#1709 of 2672
Re: WHAT ARE U GETTING on 2008 V6 w/VCM [parviz] by ljgbjg
Apr 14, 2008 (5:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: parviz (Apr 13, 2008 6:43 pm)

Guess I just like the old fashioned way of calculating mileage.
 
This past week we put on 200 miles of urban/suburban stop and go driving and 245 miles of highway driving at 70-75 MPH with occasional bursts of speed to pass trucks where I really put my foot into it and called on all 268 horses. I had filled it, then stopped in PA and put $10.00 in it (3 gallons) to get enough gas to get us back to NJ where the gas is about $.30- .40 LESS per gallon than in PA or NY state. Once in NJ and the gas $3.05/gallon, I filled it and it took another 16 gallons, for a total of 19 gallons for 445 miles. About 23.4 MPG. Altogether not that bad considering the almost 50/50 mix, and how hard I got on it for bursts of acceleration on occasion. Seems your all around mileage and mine are supporting that achieved by Edmunds' drivers in their long term test - 24 MPG +/- .5-1 MPG.
 
I wonder about something - with older carbureted cars there were adjustements that could and had to be made for altitude - e.g a car in Denver would be set up differently than a car in Miami Beach. What happend now? Do the computer programs in the ECMs automatically calculate altitude and change the fuel mix as necessary? I am running our car primarily near sea level - up the Hudson Valley, with occasional running probably in the 1000-2000 ft above sea level territory. And in comparing our MPG here on this forum, perhaps we should also mention our driving conditions? Someone out in the Rockies is going to be calling on more power more often than someone in Iowa!
#1710 of 2672
Re: WHAT ARE U GETTING on 2008 V6 w/VCM [ljgbjg] by bug4
Apr 14, 2008 (6:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: ljgbjg (Apr 14, 2008 5:56 am)

I run at 6000-9000 feet elevation in my Honda and I'm sure it does affect fuel economy. But, because of that elevation, I also get to use 85 grade fuel. From what I understand, there simply isn't enough O2 in the combustion air to take advantage of an 87+ octane level. Having said that, at 7500 on the odometer, my 08 Accord I4, AT, EX-L consistently gets 26-29 mpg with 90% interstate driving (75-85 mph.) (I drive fast, but tend not to accelerate or decelerate quickly - and I never let the engine race on hills).
 
With regard to the engine's adjustment to elevation, from my limited understanding, the engine does not adjust the "mix." Rather, it adjusts the timing. The mix stays the same, but the timing is advanced or retarded to account for the different speeds at which combustion takes place at different elevations (i.e. different O2 levels). Of course, on all modern engines, this all takes place automatically.
#1711 of 2672
Re: WHAT ARE U GETTING on 2008 V6 w/VCM [bug4] by ljgbjg
Apr 14, 2008 (7:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: bug4 (Apr 14, 2008 6:59 am)

Interesting - I can understand the timing adjustment and thanks for that explanation.
I was under the impression too that the carburetor had to have different jets in it for different altitudes - either leaning out fuel/air mixture because of less oxygen at higher altitudes. Does the ECM do that automatically these days for the fuel injection?
#1712 of 2672
Odometer Accuracy by modula2
Apr 14, 2008 (7:50 am)
Reply
In trying to calculate MPG for my new EX-L, i tested the accuracy of the odometer. In a 100 mile test, I discovered it was reading 3% low (showed 97 miles). Have any of you determined the error rate of your odometers? What is the range of error rate?
 
Thanks

Messages Page 172 of 268
1
...
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
...
268
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement