Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Honda Accord Honda Accord Real World MPG
2672 messages, Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM
You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: sunnfun (Mar 27, 2008 3:47 pm) Oh dear lord please no - if so I may be in the padded room next to you! 
|
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Apr 07, 2008 5:34 am) The decrease due to the new Michelin Energy MXV4 tires was not surprising, since they were softer and quieter than whatever came from Honda. No evidence of a rapid mileage improvement over the first few thousand miles as some 4cyl Accord owners have reported.
|
|
|
Replying to: plethysmo (Apr 08, 2008 7:29 am) 1. Full tread depth versus that on a worn tire 2. Tread pattern can have a big effect on the rolling resistance of the tire 3. Softness or hardness of the rubber compound can affect mileage. 4. Speed rating - the higher speed tires are generally performance tires with softer rubber compounds. Passenger car tires are in some way or another some compromise - handling and performance for ride and comfort, decreased rolling resistance for aggressive tread and rain water dispersion. Unfortunately, unlike F1 or other race cars - we have to do with one kind of tire for all conditions - race cars can and do change from soft aggressive rain tires to dry weather smooth surface tires for high performance. If you live in AZ, I suspect you seldom need rain tires, so you can go for a hard rubber compound with low rolling resistance and a less agrressive tread pattern. Seattle? Softer rubber, aggressive water dispersing tread pattern and higher rolling resistance. The exact same car's mileage will vary with locale and types of tires. Most GOOD tire merchants will have comparison charts for you that have them rated for rolling resistance, noise, revolutions/mile, etc. Changing tires can have an enormous impact on MPG - sometimes for the better, sometimes not. |
|
|
Replying to: fventura (Mar 25, 2008 3:58 pm) |
|
|
just did a round trip from Philly to NY (about 240 miles). Mostly highway, a little local in the middle. For a change, no traffic delays. Lots of troopers, so I mostly ran 65-70. Got a tick under 36 (35.9). Just me, no luggage to speak of, no AC and windows and roof closed. IMO, about the best I am ever likely to do, and pretty darned good for a car this size and comfortable. 2005 EX-L 4 cyl 5 speed stick (just hitting 24K on it).
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: stickguy (Apr 08, 2008 6:19 pm) IMO, about the best I am ever likely to do, and pretty darned good for a car this size and comfortable. And don't forget quick! A manual transmission Accord can run low 7s to 60 MPH. That's faster than the pocket rockets of a few years ago! I have the auto, so not quite as quick and involving, but it gets better highway mileage (taller gearing) and is great in point and shoot traffic. I love it! TheGrad 2006 Accord EX I4 5AT
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 08, 2008 7:13 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: ljgbjg (Apr 09, 2008 1:45 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: malmouza (Apr 09, 2008 5:11 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ljgbjg (Apr 09, 2008 5:23 am) No projections are needed in the wind tunnel, though, as the Accord has already bettered its performance due to a drop in the coefficient of drag from 0.34 to 0.31. I'd like to know how they accomplished that as the frontal area does appear to be more substantial than the gen 7's.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Honda Accord Honda Accord Real World MPG
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Accord
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
