Sign In Join 



Subaru Crew MPG-Real World Numbers

87 messages,  Last post on Jun 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM

You are in the Subaru Crew Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Truck, Sedan, Wagon, SUV




Your Community Leaders are ateixeira and rsholland.


Messages Page 7 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#55 of 87
Re: 2004 IOBS ~27 MPG [subi4obs] by rangner
Jul 11, 2006 (2:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: subi4obs (Jul 11, 2006 8:15 am)

Interesting, I have a 2000 Outback wagon and though I buy name-brand gas, I've also been having trouble with pinging. Has your OBS always done this or only recently? I think it might be the switch from MTBE to Ethanol.
Eric
#56 of 87
Re: 2004 IOBS ~27 MPG [rangner] by subi4obs
Jul 11, 2006 (11:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rangner (Jul 11, 2006 2:22 pm)

It worried me a lot at first because I discovered the manufacture date was Feb. 2003, as stated on a doorframe plate, which I somehow overlooked when checking out the car before buying it off the lot. I got the car "new" in Sept. 2004, so that seemed a very long time, odometer read 28 miles after a short test drive.
After realizing that the car must have spent a long time on the lot (actually came from Nashville, TN, about 100 miles from local dealership) I drained the gas tank to get any trapped bad gas out of there (are two sides to these, as you may or may not know, so that meant opening two different plugs). Then I changed the fuel filter. Well, I finally noticed the car will ping most when the gas tank gets below 1/2 full and especially if only at 1/4. Gas treatments were tried but I hadn't found any remedy by doing that. I think maybe higher octane helps but I only gave that a try twice.
I almost always get gas at either Raceway or Pilot near home. Haven't checked into what percentage of other stuff might be mixed in. I think the majority of pinging-- aside from that caused (supposedly) by the tank levels-- happens only during acceleration and steady uphill climbs.
Oh yeah... another thing too... there's also occassional high-pitched plunk noises during sudden decelerations (just once each time). Doesn't happen everytime but enough to be a bother to me. Sounds like a metal sheet being hit lightly under the car. I've found out that's possibly something about extra gas igniting in the exhaust pipe near the catalytic convertor, maybe, which is something I need to talk with the service people about when I take the car in for its 30K mile checkup.
Another thing I had a lot with this car is the awful sulfur smells, another thing said to be about catalytic convertors having trouble with burning fuel cleanly enough or whatever. I don't know much about it, just what I've read or heard said. Luckily those are few and far between anymore, yet seemed to happen a lot during the first year or so.
Thanks for asking Eric, hopefully not too much info given. I really need to get a look at the Ethanol, MTBE stuff when I'm at the gas stations!
#57 of 87
Latest tank by rangner
Sep 20, 2006 (7:55 pm)
Reply
I don't know if I've screwed up the math or not, but my wife drove the 2000 outback to nashville on a full tank of gas and when she got back I filled it up again taking 9.21 gallons. She drove between 70-75mph. Oh, and tire pressure was 32-33psi cold.
 
With a round trip of 328 miles I figure 35.6 mpg?!! This is on shell v-power premium gas. Usually on regular I get 24-25mpg. I switched to premium because of somewhat regular pinging. Now it doesn't ping anymore and gets incredible mileage. I'll keep checking it to see if this mileage keeps up or not. I couldn't be happier!
 
Eric
#58 of 87
Re: Latest tank [rangner] by ateixeira
Sep 21, 2006 (9:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: rangner (Sep 20, 2006 7:55 pm)

That's great if your next tank doesn't average less than 20. Did you use the same pump? Some fill more than others, due to air pockets and other factors.
 
-juice
#59 of 87
Re: Latest tank [ateixeira] by rangner
Sep 22, 2006 (6:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 21, 2006 9:01 am)

No I didn't. I'll check at the next fill-up using the same pump--if I can remember which one.
 
But the needle pegged at the same place it always does...
I'll wait and see what it does on this tank.
 
Eric
#60 of 87
Re: Conversions for the non USA based [grahampeters] by jim314
Jan 18, 2007 (4:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: grahampeters (May 16, 2005 2:58 pm)

There is a simple conversion between mpgUS and L/100km: divide whichever one you have into 235 to get the other. To convert between mpgUK and L/100km divide whichever one you have into 282.
 
1. 8.0 L/100 km ==> 235/8 = 29.4 mpgUS
 
2. 8.0 L/100 km ==> 282/8 = 35.3 mpgUK
 
3. 29.4 mpgUS ==> 235/29.4 = 8.0 L/100km
 
4. 18.8 mpgUK ==> 282/18.8 = 15.0 L/100km
#61 of 87
a change to mid-grade (89 octane) by subi4obs
Jan 21, 2007 (1:28 pm)
Reply
Not many posts going on here so I'll mention my change from 87 octane (almost always cheapest found) to 89 octane.
 
It apparently dropped from 27 MPG to 24 or 25 at first. Now after 3 tankfuls it's back again to 27.
 
I almost never buy gas from places like Chevron, Exxon, Shell, etc. so it's usually Murphy USA, RaceTrac (or Raceway), Pilot, Wavaho.
 
I remember when I tried Shell premium once (only once) and I think the MPG increased to 28. But that was a couple years ago so I can't say that with absolute certainty. I'm considering paying a little more for awhile and see if it helps stop the engine knock I've been plagued with.
 
For now I'm still getting the gas at the cheaper places and I might move on to the expensive stuff at least temporarily to find out what changes happen. I'd have done this sooner if not for the bad timing of price increases.
 
Interestingly, the car is rated at 21 city, 27 hwy. I probably only drive in city traffic 10% of the time so the gas mileage must be what's to be expected.
#62 of 87
3.0H6 vs 2.5T mileage by cptplt
Feb 21, 2007 (3:10 pm)
Reply
do people think a 3.0 Bean will get better mileage than a 2.5 XT OB turbo with auto ? I ask because its probably a choice between those two to replace my 98 legacy (unless the bums at SOA come out with a 2.5i with VDC).
#63 of 87
Re: 3.0H6 vs 2.5T mileage [cptplt] by dino001
Feb 21, 2007 (4:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cptplt (Feb 21, 2007 3:10 pm)

VDC will propagate down the scale and probability of getting it with 2.5i in 2008 is high, as Subaru wants to capitalize on IIHS top ratings. Perhaps Ltd. trim first - who knows.
#64 of 87
Re: 3.0H6 vs 2.5T mileage [cptplt] by ateixeira
Feb 22, 2007 (6:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: cptplt (Feb 21, 2007 3:10 pm)

It really depends. I think if you step into it, i.e. accelerate and really use that turbo, it'll use more gas. Plus it requires premium, while the H6 can make do on regular.
 
If you baby it, it'll probably be about the same mileage.
 
Odds are the H6 will cost less to fuel up, especially if you use regular or plus.
 
-juice

Messages Page 7 of 10
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement