Sign In Join 



Suzuki Grand Vitara 2006 through 2008

1006 messages,  Last post on Oct 11, 2009 at 9:29 PM

You are in the Suzuki Grand Vitara/Vitara Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Suzuki Grand Vitara, SUV


Messages Page 100 of 102
1
...
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#983 of 1006
Re: Suzuki warranties [wisegirl65] by norwoodsmn
Jan 06, 2009 (1:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wisegirl65 (Jan 02, 2009 12:34 pm)

Very sorry to hear all that... As I'm still considering an '09, I downloaded the warranty booklet for a look see as yet another part of my ongoing in depth research. I noted in the back of same, Suzuki [even] states how as a last resort if you are unsatisfied with warranty service, (prior to the steps you are now initiating), how they suggest [you] use the arbitration process to try to resolve things. A predicate to following this course of action would be your having been convinced your best interests as an owner were well served at each stage when you experienced these difficulties. Specifically, yes, I'm talking about the dealership service department, first and foremost. If they didn't have their stuff together, (and not all of 'em do, but that probably goes for a lot of car mfgr's dealerships too), and [they] failed to solve yr. issues, and instead through ineptitude, couldn't diagnose/fix things, then on further down the line if there was an unsympathetic district service representative thrown into the mix too, (they have been know to exist), well then I could see, hey, why bother to look into that arbitration stuff, just sue 'em! But hey, none of us can walk in your shoes, and you gotta do what you gotta do...
 
Most stories have more than one side though, which is why I think the arbitration process might be worth a shot for others, (first), before unleashing the heavy artillery. Let us know how it goes...
#984 of 1006
Re: Suzuki warranties [wisegirl65] by revjim64
Jan 06, 2009 (1:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wisegirl65 (Jan 02, 2009 12:34 pm)

And I purchased a 2007 Suzuki GV because my 2002 Chevy Impala was a Lemon!!
 
My GV only has 16k on it. So far I haven't had any problems,other than lousy gas mileage. I am getting about 17mpg city.
 
 I am concerned about the tire wear problems that everyone seems to be having.
 
I hope I can get at least another 16K on the tires before I have to change them!!
They tread seems to be wearing evenly. They are Yokohama Geolanders.
#985 of 1006
Re: Suzuki warranties [revjim64] by xostnot
Jan 06, 2009 (10:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: revjim64 (Jan 06, 2009 1:48 pm)

Sounds like you have the original tires. If you're in the US, 17mpg city is within the typical range. That would be low for the Cdn gallon.
 
Wheel misalignment will cost mileage due to the energy wasted wearing away the tires. Presumably it will also prematurely wear the drivetrain.
 
The wheels should be rotated regularly. Unfortunately this will mask an abnormal rear tire wear problem. If you have 16K (miles) on the tires and they're half worn, you're doing ok. The even tire wear is a good sign. We have 32K (km) on ours and they have about half the tread depth left.
 
Only Suzuki knows for sure, but I'd estimate that about 10% of the '06's have the abnormal tire wear problem, plus maybe a very very few '07's.
#986 of 1006
Re: Suzuki warranties [xostnot] by bm000092
Feb 16, 2009 (4:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: xostnot (Jan 06, 2009 10:08 pm)

Old but I don't remember seeing it:
link title
#987 of 1006
Should I do it? by motormindy
Feb 21, 2009 (12:00 pm)
Reply
Hi, havent posted but need some advice here. Hadnt ever considered a Suzuki or a GV b/4 yesterday. I threw a rod in my 2003 Ford Windstar on Tues. need to get a new vehicle fast. I work for Edmunds and was visiting a dealer about a future product when he said he bought some Suzuki's from a dealer that went our of business 45 days ago. He has a 2007 GV with 57 (yes 57) miles on it, it has manual trans, 2wd., pearlized cranberry exterior. Kinda cute vehicle I hadnt considered, no 3rd seat (I have 3 kids; 7, 9, 12 ( this could work- just cant take alot of extras which isnt always a bad thing.) His final negotiation is $11,400 plus $400 for clear coat to be added on the paint and his cost $940 to add leather seats (I really want leather with 3 kids). So that is $12,7 out the door. I am looking for a fantastic deal. I love Nissan but the price is too much as my husband needs a new vehicle too. I was thinking I can drive this Suzuki for a few years then hand down to my daughter. Is this a steal or should I keep looking?
#988 of 1006
Re: Should I do it? [motormindy] by steve_ HOST
Feb 21, 2009 (12:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: motormindy (Feb 21, 2009 12:00 pm)

The only quibble I would have is the $400 for the clear coat - that's not worth it. I wouldn't pay anything for "paint protection."
 
My neighbor's brother has a GV and I've quizzed him about it. He's been really happy with his.
 
I'd be a bit concerned that the battery is marginal and that various seals, fluids and bits could be corroded or gummed up just from sitting around so long. And I'd want to know if the full warranty is in effect or not, and how far I'd have to go to get service.
 
Good luck!
#989 of 1006
motormindy by budman3
Feb 21, 2009 (6:43 pm)
Reply
I agree with everything that Steve the host said.
If the dealer went out of business, where is the nearest dealer?
Hopefully the tire issue was fixed for 07 or else you may need to replace tires in less than 20k miles. Some vehicles didn't have the problem. My 06 did.
Is it being sold as new? It would still be considered a 2 year old vehicle.
I did a quick search on Kelley blue book.
Retail, 12,590
Private party, 10,490
trade in value, 8800
I think you're getting an OK deal. Definately not fantastic or a steal. My opinion, when I can buy something at trade in value, it's a steal. That's how stealerships make their money.
#990 of 1006
by xostnot
Feb 24, 2009 (9:28 pm)
Reply
I'd determine if the clear coat is an actual coat of paint, or just an expensive wax job. I can't imagine they'd prepare and paint it for $400. On the other hand, the oem paint is delicate (we have the deep red on our '06 Grand Vitara), so any extra layer of paint would be helpful.
 
I think you'd be happy with this, except those three kids are going to be in fairly close quarters in the back seat. On the other hand, I had two siblings and we lived with sharing a back seat.
 
Test drive it carefully to see if it feels unstable, or if there seem to be odd driveline noises. These would be tipoffs to having the rear alignment issue. The alignment issue is usually fixable, but not always, it seems.
 
I think you have to ensure it has a the original warranty coverage, or have the dealer throw in a good aftermarket warranty coverage.
 
It's a little more trucklike than a CRV or a Rav4, but as long as you're ok with that, you should be fine with it, or even delighted.
#991 of 1006
Re: Should I do it? [motormindy] by js06gv
Feb 25, 2009 (7:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: motormindy (Feb 21, 2009 12:00 pm)

You mentioned pearlized cranberry as the color. If you are referring to the metallic or pearl red color (don't remember if the color I considered maroon was a three stage, or pearl, paint) The 2006 I previously owned was the traditional red color - I think Suzuki calls it Racy Red. This color is non-metallic and does not come from the factory with clear coat, a cost-cutting measure that is virtually non-existent these days save for a few other non-metallic colors from Asian manufacturers. Ford used to have some non-clear colors too, but the Big 3 are all at least 2-stage now. My fault for not doing my homework first before deciding on red, and I got pretty hot when I waxed the car for the first time and the cloth turned red. It reminded me of my old 1991 Ford Ranger.
 
Sorry to be so long-winded, but a proper clear coat job by a body shop would cost well over $400, so my guess is that the dealer is merely quoting some type of paint protection package. This is not worth it, and is particularly a waste of money if the color you are looking at already has clear coat on it. Also, beware of the rear tire issue. My frustration with this seeminly non-correctible issue was one of the main reasons that led me to trade the vehicle in after a little over the year. My neighbor still has his 2006 GV and has been replacing tires ever since it had about 12K on it
#992 of 1006
Suzuki worst suv by budman3
Mar 04, 2009 (4:50 pm)
Reply
I know, i know, it's not the GV but the fact that Suzuki topped the 5 worst is worth mentioning.
It also states the depreciation is the biggest downfall, exactly what I was irate about with our GV.
I think it all boils over to the entire line.
And what did motormindy decide on with that used GV?
  http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/866/the-worst-cars-f- or-the-money/;_ylt=ApJRMuwmgeCPMSO.Jq5QfuwazJV4

Messages Page 100 of 102
1
...
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement