Sign In Join 



Suzuki Grand Vitara 2006 through 2008

1006 messages,  Last post on Oct 11, 2009 at 9:29 PM

You are in the Suzuki Grand Vitara/Vitara Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Suzuki Grand Vitara, SUV


Messages Page 94 of 101
1
...
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
...
101
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#928 of 1006
Re: [budman3] by bm000092
Oct 31, 2008 (4:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: budman3 (Oct 14, 2008 10:17 am)

Suzuki Canada has updated their site with the new 2009 models. There is a lot of errors on that new site, lots of missing or wrong information. The layout of the new site is really poor.
#929 of 1006
Re: [bm000092] by norwoodsmn
Nov 01, 2008 (10:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bm000092 (Oct 31, 2008 4:24 am)

Saw that in the "build one" part, guess it only comes with a primer coat, as you can't tell "it" what color you want. Oh well, give them some time.... I like the new tv ads though. "We'll do whatever it takes to...." We'll see about that sometime in late December, (I forecast).... Think they are missing the boat now on clearing out the '08's, by not offering reduced financing rates ALONG WITH the $5,000.00 or so price cut. As to getting more new '09's in, I just talked to a volume dealer some distance away who said [they] wouldn't bring more of them in until they'd sold off their '08's. I can understand that on one level, but If that held true here, we might not see any more '09's till spring! Step up to the plate Suzuki by combining price and financing deals. Near the end of it's model run now, a base '09, (ya, that's AN '09), Mazda 3 sport is now selling for thousands less before the spring debut of the new '10, AND you get a good financing rate too. Wake up little Suzy, wake up little Suzy...
 
Recently tested the base '09 Forester. EXCELLENT car like cornering feel thanks to that low center of mass. However: 5 speed manual too "rubbery" lacking the much tough(er) feel of a Suzuki '08 manual. Unfortunate dash treatment, and the grey interior is very dull, but the black is nice. NOTE: the engine is noise(ier) than the new '09 four cylinder GV, but it's know for that, for whatever that's worth? Not broken in, it ran out of breath on a freeway hill in 5th, but the auto four cylinder GV did not on the same hill! Clearly the auto box would be the trannie to go with in this much more car like Sube. Tough(er) though it is for '09, you can feel it wouldn't stand up as well to the same sort of demanding recreational usage which Suzuki's can. The "expedition class" winner?, no surprise, it's advantage Suzuki.
 
Still need to find a base '09 JA GV [somewhere] to test. Yes, even drove a used auto '02 XL-7. That 2.7 engine does wear well, which also is no surprise to me as all Suzuki engines seem to. Haven't ruled it out as a stop gap move. But may default to the old principal that 4:30pm on the last business day in December,
is THE best time/day of the year to buy a car....
 
Still no new '09 owners out there?
#930 of 1006
Re: [norwoodsmn] by bm000092
Nov 03, 2008 (4:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: norwoodsmn (Nov 01, 2008 10:30 pm)

For what it worths, there is a 4 day review of the 09 I4 on Canadian Driver
www.canadiandriver.com/ctc/blog/trucks-suvs/2009-suzuki-grand-vitara.htm
#931 of 1006
Re: [bm000092] by steve_ HOST
Nov 03, 2008 (6:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: bm000092 (Nov 03, 2008 4:59 am)

Looks like the moral is to avoid the 4 cylinder and get the six (or develop better driving habits than the reviewer).
 
I was browsing cars over the weekend and went to the web page of the local Suzuki dealer to check out the SX4 Sport. There was a drop down menu for the Grvtr. It took me a minute to figure out what the heck that was.
#932 of 1006
Re: [steve_] by norwoodsmn
Nov 04, 2008 (10:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 03, 2008 6:38 am)

TD the four. As proffered before, I think goodness-wise it's easily our own CRV [equivalent] engine. One tester said he tried the base JA and liked it, (it has the manual 5 speed and full time AWD), but that brief impression was the extent of "the detail" with emphasis on a near loaded auto four.
 
I'd like to see a test that explored the extent of what the base GV, (the Forester fighter), JA AWD version could do in [reasonably] demanding conditions. That info is out there now on the base '09 5speed Forester, as it was "pressed" in California on Catalina Island where it did well on rough goat tracks. But again my Forester TD recently suggested "you wouldn't want to go there" in the Sube on a regular basis, with, (on the other hand), it likely being OK(er) in a much tougher base '09 Grand Vitara. Would like to see a head to head between these two base models. A potentially valuable marketing ploy [Suzuki?] Especially since the Forester can now almost be considered mainstream with it's up market redesign for '09? Go for it.
#933 of 1006
Re: [norwoodsmn] by steve_ HOST
Nov 04, 2008 (12:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: norwoodsmn (Nov 04, 2008 10:56 am)

The 4 is only available in AWD in the US and FWD is fine for us (although I've been trying to talk my wife into looking at a Forester too, but I'm not gaining much traction there either). The real world mpg reports are still pretty good on the 4 with the MT.
 
But we digress...
#934 of 1006
Re: [steve_] by norwoodsmn
Nov 04, 2008 (1:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 04, 2008 12:08 pm)

Are we digressing? I don't think so only because TDing the pair directly answers the question of how good the [now] truly "new GV" is, and isn't that what most everyone here has to be wondering? As "we've" done both now, incidentally the wife agrees it's advantage Suzuki. It's really necessary to take yr. better half out there for spin(s) Steve, to bring ones perspective right up to date owing to all the new developments [for both] for '09.
 
Maybe I'm off here?, but further I see the two as chief competitors against one another for active recreational users who potentially can make do without the low range gears.
 
Think the 2wd GV model is std. base for '09 in the US, with AWD, (but no low range), optional for their four cylinder? At least AWD is std. eqpt. on our base JA here in The Great White North. Still nothing on the US site, but spending time to get it all working right first, might not be a bad idea.....
#935 of 1006
Re: [norwoodsmn] by steve_ HOST
Nov 04, 2008 (1:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: norwoodsmn (Nov 04, 2008 1:54 pm)

Yeah, but I have a Subaru, and I'm of the mindset that the Forester and Outback are wagons.
 
The guy next door has a Grand Vitara (which he likes very much btw), but it looks more like a SUV to me and my wife really doesn't want anything that looks remotely like an SUV. I've had no luck with my Forester hints, much less something more rugged looking, and she flat turned down a test drive after just sitting in a mild CR-V. So far she's liking the Scion xD the best. That's my SX4 digression in here, since it seems more directly comparable to the xD than the GV.
 
But your point is well taken. I'll try to sneak both of them on her list.
#936 of 1006
Re: [steve_] by norwoodsmn
Nov 04, 2008 (2:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Nov 04, 2008 1:58 pm)

Ah, real time blogging with the host, cool.....
 
The real Beauty of the Beast is that while it may look like a politically incorrect SUV?, (but it's the same size as a CRV, right?), advise her that the '09 2.4 liter:
 
1.) Has attended AA meetings with it's 2.7 liter cousin, and thus has not acquired it's drinking problem.
   
2.) It no longer drives as much "like one" in the handling department, and in fact is a real pleasure to drive. She'd love an auto box one, I'm sure.
 
On station wagons, right, but the additional space in the "a bit bigger" GV would be a real blessing. But that Forester has a mini "cavern" back there too.
 
If it's more car like though, I hear her. The security of AWD is sure a blessing though in either the GV or Forester, as you well know. We encouraged my dad to buy a new Outback a few years ago for safety reasons. Happy shopping.
 
PS: gotcha on our digression. But: my son would love to have the Scion coupe. We finally get Scions here in Canada next year. JUST SAW this Toyota brand is now considered to have the best RELIABILITY in the biz. Impressive. Again, the "R" word would be a factor to have to consider in the purchase of either the mostly all new '09 Forester, or GV. But we shall digress no more, (maybe)...
#937 of 1006
Re: [norwoodsmn] by steve_ HOST
Nov 04, 2008 (3:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: norwoodsmn (Nov 04, 2008 2:40 pm)

She'd love an auto box one, I'm sure.
 
It's hard to say what a deal killer would be, but an automatic would be right up there with black paint. We both miss having a stick shift.
 
We will keep either the wagon or minivan, so we'd like this car to be smaller (ergo her immediate nixing of the CR-V). So the Grand Vitara probably won't get far on her list.
 
We owned mostly FWD cars in Anchorage for 20 winters and like them fine, especially since they tend to get better mpg than AWD/4WD flavors. There are times when it's nice though.
 
Reliability is a nice plus, but most all cars are pretty reliable these days. Scions sales were slumping before the recent economic crash and still aren't setting records here in spite of that nice reliability report from Consumer Reports.
 
What I should do is call Parts and find out how much a Grand Vitara or SX4 alternator or starter costs and compare those numbers to the Subarus and Toyotas and Hondas and Pontiacs.

Messages Page 94 of 101
1
...
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
...
101
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement