Sign In Join

Audi A3 Prices Paid and Buying Experiences

406 messages,  Last post on Sep 05, 2008 at 4:26 AM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Audi A3, Wagon


Messages Page 19 of 42
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
42
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#174 of 406
Re: the subie vs the audi [kurtamaxxxguy] by subiedubie
Mar 21, 2006 (7:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Mar 16, 2006 6:28 pm)

There is no Subaru WTX model in the USA. I believe you are thinking of the Impreza WRX that comes in sedan and wagon models. Also, do you know what model year your friend's car was? For 2006 Subaru changed engines, placing the 2.5 230 hp engine in the WRX which has no turbo lag.
 
You can also get leather and a moonroof in the WRX, nad even with those options, It's still less than a similar A3, plus you get AWD. Granted, the interior is more spartan, byut that is another area that they upgraded for 2006.
#175 of 406
Purchased 2.0T MT by guitarbob
Mar 21, 2006 (5:03 pm)
Reply
Thanks to all who post here.
 
I just agreed to purchase a 2.0T MT, basically stripped, which is just about right for me. Prices, before tax, license, etc.:
 
 MSRP (Base, Paint, Destination) = 25,910.
 
 Invoice = 24,128.
 
 I just agreed to 24,800, which is 1,110 under MSRP and 672 over invoice.
 
Purchased from Tucson Audi (Arizona). They did not have the combo I wanted (silver with with black interior), but there is one on its way in 3-4 weeks.
 
I first tried the Subaru WRX wagon, which I liked quite a bit (esp. the seats), but it seemed to be somewhat of a step down in overall quality compared to the A3, especially the interior materials. Nice though.
 
I tried the normally aspirated Outback and it was nice too, but I found it boring.
 
Finally, I tried the new VW GTI given it's common platform and motor with the A3. Liked it, esp. the $3,000 less, and their willingness to sell just above invoice. It has some useful stuff standard than the A3 doesn't have or is an option (mp3 6-disk CD player, standard trip computer); I like the typical sunroof too. In the end, it's just a bit too much "boy racer" for this 41 year-old.
 
So I sprung for the A3. First new car in 15 years!
 
 
#176 of 406
Re: Good deal? [moto99] by misterjj
Mar 22, 2006 (8:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: moto99 (Mar 17, 2006 5:51 pm)

this price is including tax and handling fees. the car itself is priced at $29049. How does this sound now?
 
That's less than $500 below MSRP. You should be able to do better. My experience:
 
First dealer wanted MSRP and eventually gave me $500 below MSRP and made it sound like some huge favor. I mentioned the Costco discount and they said they didn't participate in the Costco program because it wasn't "fair".
 
The second dealer would do Costco price ($750 over invoice) but there would be added fees and I would have to go through the fleet manager who seemed way to busy to spend much time with me. The regular salesman had treated me well so I agreed to buy from him at $1000 over invoice with no additional fees (about $1000 below MSRP). Try to negotiate from invoice price and watch out for a low price but with added dealer prep and other fees.
#177 of 406
Re: Good deal? [misterjj] by ccd1
Mar 22, 2006 (9:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: misterjj (Mar 22, 2006 8:37 am)

I've been curious about the Costco program since it seems to be one of the best no hassle buying programs around. Was the price under the program $750 over invoice for the base car and MSRP for all options or $750 over invoice for the car and the options?
#178 of 406
A3 3.2 v. S4 Avant by ccd1
Mar 22, 2006 (9:50 am)
Reply
I along with everyone else have had reservations about the pricing of the A3 3.2. Happened to be looking at the 3.2 inventory and asking prices for a local dealer and noticed a 2004 S4 Avant that was priced the same as a loaded 3.2.
 
It seemed like a 2 yr old S4 Avant with low miles could be a real alternative to the 3.2. Yes, it is used and I have questions how anyone owning a S4 drove the car. However, you avoid the big depreciation hits of the first 2 years of ownership, the car is bigger and has more utility, and it is one heck of a lot more powerful. The only downside besides finding one that hadn't been abused is that you are kissing any semblance of good gas mileage goodbye.
 
Any thoughts???
#179 of 406
Re: Good deal? [misterjj] by moto99
Mar 22, 2006 (3:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: misterjj (Mar 22, 2006 8:37 am)

Thanks for the help. Unfortunately there are only two dealerships in Denver to work with and only one has the car that I am looking for. They don't have a hugh stock of A3. However, I did get them to throw in the HP Solar Gard window tint for free and that they would get me 5 A/S tire at cost when my performance tires are worned out. Installation included. I guess small markets has its restrictions. Thanks again.
#180 of 406
Re: A3 3.2 v. S4 Avant [ccd1] by kurtamaxxxguy
Mar 22, 2006 (5:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ccd1 (Mar 22, 2006 9:50 am)

The 3.2 's engine doesn't seem to have direct injection. If so it'll be less efficient than the 2.0 's (the latter has excellent lo rev torque for a "small" motor).
 
I remember you mentioning you didn't like the 3.2's ride on rough roads. How does the S4 do in comparison?
 
(both of above and high cost's why I gave up on A3 3.2)
 
Does/Will the S4 run on regular without any problem? The A3 2.0 apparently will, but I doubt the 3.2s' older engine would handle this as well (am I wrong here? ).
#181 of 406
Re: A3 3.2 v. S4 Avant [kurtamaxxxguy] by shipo
Mar 22, 2006 (6:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Mar 22, 2006 5:30 pm)

"Does/Will the S4 run on regular without any problem? The A3 2.0 apparently will..."
 
Why would you even want to?
 
Best Regards,
Shipo
#182 of 406
Re: A3 3.2 v. S4 Avant [kurtamaxxxguy] by ccd1
Mar 23, 2006 (6:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxxguy (Mar 22, 2006 5:30 pm)

I have to agree with Shipo. If you are worried about gas mileage or type of gas used, get a Prius. The A3 2.0 gets better gas mileage than the 3.2 and you can get the regular suspension on the 2.0 and it costs less money. If those are your concerns, the 2.0 becomes a no-brainer.
 
The S4 Avant gets MUCH worse gas mileage than the 3.2. That car has a V-8 in it and a 2 yr old S4 will cost as much as a brand new loaded 3.2. There is a good review of both the 3.2 and the S4 Avant at thetruthaboutcars.com
 
Here you are complaining about the cost of the 3.2, but in another thread here you are talking about how Audi could sell S3s and RS3s in the US. Cost is an issue with the A3 and is the major reason why people just don't run out and get the car.
#183 of 406
Re: A3 3.2 v. S4 Avant [ccd1] by kurtamaxxxguy
Mar 24, 2006 (6:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ccd1 (Mar 23, 2006 6:41 am)

Sometimes Gas prices skyrocket, or you can't get the gas you want (70's oil embargo? I went thru it in both my German cars). It's good the A3 series can tolerate regular for short times - some cars cannot.
 
The Edmunds audi town hall transcript here was a good read!
Fingers x'ed on the 2.0 T AWD!
 
Also, Boomers are becomming a dominant market. A lot of them grew up with VW and by association, Audi. They want fast, powerful, luxo cars, but not necessarrly huge ones. That RS3 market may be here!

Messages Page 19 of 42
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
42
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement