You are here:
Forums
Wagons
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser

108 messages, Last post on Dec 03, 2009 at 10:33 AM
You are in the Chrysler PT Cruiser Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: redturboboy (Jun 16, 2005 7:42 pm) what do you all think? |
|
|
I have to also agree that Chrysler should step up and paint the mirrors on the PT, this would give it a more finished look since the bumpers are now painted to match the rest of the PT, unlike the early models that were released. On a side note I took my 04 GT back to the dealership and had them paint the side view mirrors to match and total cost was under 300.00 and it makes a huge difference in the look. |
|
|
I have found three other websites with much more detailed information - membership rules prevent me from posting the links - but I am surprised Edmunds isn't equally up to date (they usually are the leader). Two surprising bits of information: Chrysler claims much improved sound proofing (I had one and thought it was already pretty good) lowering the noise in the cabin by 5 db, which is great; and they are promising to match Chevy's new HHR on pricing. We'll have to see about the pricing, because Chevy is now toying with the idea of pricing their cars to market, instead of pricing them high and then rebating them heavily. |
|
|
|
| That the HHR starts around 15k. Am I correct? I also believe that the HHR and Cobalt won't take price slashes because GM believes that the HHR will be a hot seller. | |
|
Replying to: chris65amg (Jun 21, 2005 12:06 pm) My guess is that Chevy wants to revert to the old model of "tough negotiators will get a grand off, once in a while we'll throw out a special rebate of a grand or so, but not too often." The cycle of rebates is messing up everyone - it makes the cars look like they depreciate too fast, because the ALG and other guides report resale values compared to MSRP, not to actual selling prices, etc., plus in California at least we have to pay sales tax on the "price before rebate" so it is better to buy a lower MSRP or discounted car, than a rebated car. I don't think either car is a "hot" seller but in the beginning they run the assembly lines slowly to ensure quality, and there are enough buyers who want novelty that there is no need to discount until they ramp up productio and the eager buyers are replaced by more routine buyers. The Mustang and the Chrysler 300 are "hot" sellers. |
|
|
Replying to: chris65amg (Jun 21, 2005 12:06 pm) The new front look on the PT could prove to be a marketing disaster. Loren |
|
|
Replying to: Sylvia (May 03, 2005 6:49 pm) In the intended market the PT Cruiser has no competition. Chevy came too late with too little... |
|
|
|
| I think that the HHR looks deplorable. | |
|
They did copy a lot of the PT features in the HHR. I have seen the little beast, and it is OK. Really not as cool as the PT though. Sort of like a shrunk down old Suburban, but that is what they wanted. IF GM was smart they would make a little truck version of the HHR. In a truck, the front would look pretty cool, and they could sell them as pairs. One of each in every driveway. The PT looks fine the way it is today. Changing the grill to stop at the top of the bumper line, and changing the dash is just sooooo wrong. Sure upgrading the sound proofing is a good idea. To have a broader hood is good for access, but will it change the look. The PT has a lot of good functional attributes, but least we forget, a lot of the appeal is still in the look. Some say Chrysler Air Flow, while others say '39 Ford, or just look at the gangster car or whiskey runner car when they first view the car. Why change that? The Chevy people say it was modeled after the Suburban. Hummmm? Guess it missed the mark. Looks better than that! The new HHR will siphon off some buyers that would possibly have bought the PT, but I hope the new PT 2006 changes are not doing even more harm. Here is an interesting note: The optional engine in the HHR requires premium gas, has more HP than the base PT, but 3 # less torque than the base PT. I bought the base PT with a stick, and it gets up and goes OK. I can see though in an automatic, it may be marginal. Anyway, the top HHR engine is 162# torque and our base engine is 165# torque. Loren
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Wagons
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats