Sign In Join 



Acura RL vs. Infiniti M35

269 messages,  Last post on Nov 30, 2007 at 6:21 PM

You are in the Acura RL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura RL, Infiniti M35, Sedan


Messages Page 26 of 27
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#250 of 269
Re: Consumer Reports...? RL vs. M [carfan28] by uglybear
Jan 02, 2007 (11:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carfan28 (Dec 19, 2006 5:30 pm)

I don't know if Infiniti M has the same Bose as FX, but Bose in FX is crap. I own FX45 and had to go to a car stereo shop and replace junk speakers, and and throw away tne stock sub. Costed me $3K extra to get decent sound out of Infiniti. Bose is NOT about great sound. Mark Levinson is. Acura apparently also uses Bose. Look in any car audio mag - you won't find much Bose there. Hey, second from the top Alpine CD/FM + two a/d/g speakers sound better than the entire 8 speakers + sub Bose junk in FX45.
#253 of 269
M35x vs RL by dano4
Jan 24, 2007 (3:59 am)
Reply
I owned a 2005 RL for two years and have had a 2007 M35x for 3 months. Following are some reactions:
 
--More room in the M. I am 6'3" and I like the higher seating position. For me, the front seats are also more comfortable. There is slightly more room in the back and the trunk is definitely much larger and more useable, although the trunk opening is smaller in the M.
 
--The handling on the RL was slightly better. Better directional stability (i.e. the steering is a little "nervous" on the M) and the SH 4WD cannot be beat. The RL is normally more in FWD, while the M is normally more in RWD. Makes a difference and is personal preference. I believe the ride is better on the M, although a little firmer.
 
--RL had better mileage. I regularly got 28mpg on the highway vs 23 on the M. This is due to the much lower 5th gear and closer gear ratios in the M. The M has smoother acceleration and better shifting as a result, but the penalty is the gas mileage. Both cars need a six speed or maybe, in the case of the M, the Nissan CVT.
 
--The NAV systems are a toss-up. The M's system is faster, has fewer annoying warning screens, and has friendlier views. The RL had the ability to call up a longer list of destinations, complete with phone numbers-really handy for calling a hotel from the road.
 
--The quality of the M has been perfect to date. I was really put off by all of the recalls on the 2005RL. It never left me stranded, but dealing with all of the recalls was a real pain. It was not an Acura-like experience. Both the Acura and Infiniti dealers are 50 miles away.
 
--Depreciation experience is yet to be determined for the M. My RL dropped 35% in value-trade vs. MSRP-in two years. Much was due to the rebates necessary to move the 2006 models. Not as bad as most American cars, but worse than my 2002 Lexus LS 430.
 
--Styling. The RL does strongly resemble a Honda Accord. This was a major mistake in restyling the RL as was shortening the wheelbase by nearly 2 inches. On the other hand, the M is pretty non-descript as well. I am OK with the styling on both and am more interested in the drive and quality.
 
--Mechanical. Both engines are works of art and smooth as butter. Same for the transmissions, with a slight edge to the M on upshifts, and a bigger edge to the M on downshifts. More engine sound with the M, which I like. It is closer to a BMW in character, while the RL is more like a cross between a Lexus and a Honda. Why can't American manufacturers build engines like these?
 
--Miscellaneous. Like the push button start on the M. Like the back-up camera on the M-now on the 2007 RL. Dealer experience for both has been great. it's really nice to be treated well vs. the low quality at most American car dealerships. A few more standard electronic toys on the RL, none of which mattered to me.
 
In summary, these are two great cars and you can't go wrong with either one. Preference should be largely based on the test drive, the price, and the proximity and quality of the dealer.
#254 of 269
Re: M35x vs RL [dano4] by tayl0rd
Jan 24, 2007 (6:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: dano4 (Jan 24, 2007 3:59 am)

--Mechanical. Both engines are works of art and smooth as butter. Same for the transmissions, with a slight edge to the M on upshifts, and a bigger edge to the M on downshifts. More engine sound with the M, which I like. It is closer to a BMW in character, while the RL is more like a cross between a Lexus and a Honda. Why can't American manufacturers build engines like these?
 
Actually they can and they do. But most people who purchase in these classes are such dash strokers and badge snobs that they're put off by the American cars since they aren't squishy and posh enough. But GM's Northstar V8 and new 3.8L V6 are smooth. Ford's modular engines are smooth (when used in some applications) and its new 3.5L V6 is said to be smooth. Chrysler's HEMI V8 is smooth as butter and its 3.5L V6 is smooth (when used in the 300, at least it was in the 300M).
#255 of 269
Re: M35x vs RL [tayl0rd] by carfan28
Feb 13, 2007 (8:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tayl0rd (Jan 24, 2007 6:08 am)

I rent American cars all the time and one of my latest rentals was the 300M- a piece of crap compared to the M35 and the RL! The seats are like my grandmother's couch, there's no road feel,the inside parts feel like cheap plastic, and these Amercian cars that you refer to are not reliable. Who wants to have their second biggest investment in the shop getting fixed all the time.
 
It's a darn shame because in so many other business areas we lead the world. I'm all for supporting American companies, but it's seems that Detroit is incapable of making a great product. Hondas, Nissans and Toyotas and all the Japanese vehicles have a large percentage of their cars made in the US anyway- so we who buy these cars are supporting ourselves as well.
#256 of 269
Re: M35x vs RL [carfan28] by tayl0rd
Feb 14, 2007 (6:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: carfan28 (Feb 13, 2007 8:32 pm)

... and these Amercian cars that you refer to are not reliable. ...
 
I'd love to see some proof of that. The 300M for one, during its production, was rated as one of the most reliable cars in America (by CR, I believe). Did it leave you stranded when you rented it? Also keep in mind you're (for whatever reason) thinking an older, out-of-production $30K car should have an interior comparable to modern, $40K+ luxury cars. I've been in and driven all three cars, and I definitely wouldn't say the 300M is a "piece of crap" compared to the M35 or RL, ESPECIALLY not the RL. Have you taken a look at that boom-box looking center stack of the RL with its hard, cheap plastic? Glass houses and stone throwers don't mix. Outside of electronic gimmickry, the 300M is on par with the RL, despite being older; and don't even mention interior space.
#257 of 269
Re: M35x vs RL [dano4] by carfan28
Feb 23, 2007 (9:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dano4 (Jan 24, 2007 3:59 am)

Thanks for the great review dano4! Very nicely done.
#258 of 269
Road Test 2007 RL and 2006 M35X by carfan28
Feb 23, 2007 (10:15 pm)
Reply
Just test drove the RL and the M35X back to back and took a long look at both.
 
RL positives:
SHAWD- drive system
On the fly navigation system
Better fuel economy
MP3 player is incorporated with the car's audio system
Quieter Cabin
Smoother Ride
Wood steering wheel option
Run Flat tires option
Proven good local dealer
 
RL Negatives:
No DVD player for playing movies while car is in park
Worse resale value
2005 had many bugs
Consumer Reports didn't give it a great recommendation
I see old ladies and old men driving it
No birdview navigation
 
M35X Positives:
DVD player plays movies while in park
Better resale value
2006 Consumer Reports Top Pick
Men drive the car
3D Birdsview Navigation
Much better lease rate
 
M35X Negatives:
Worse fuel economy
noisier cabin
bouncier ride
MP3 Player doesn't interact with the car audio system
Navigation can only work when car's in park
No wood steering wheel option available
#259 of 269
Re: Road Test 2007 RL and 2006 M35X [carfan28] by james27
Feb 24, 2007 (10:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: carfan28 (Feb 23, 2007 10:15 pm)

RE the M series and the nav system; you can adjust things via the voice commands while on the move.

Messages Page 26 of 27
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement