You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Acura RL
Acura RL vs. Infiniti M35

269 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2007 at 6:21 PM
You are in the Acura RL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: carfan28 (Dec 19, 2006 5:30 pm) |
|
|
I owned a 2005 RL for two years and have had a 2007 M35x for 3 months. Following are some reactions: --More room in the M. I am 6'3" and I like the higher seating position. For me, the front seats are also more comfortable. There is slightly more room in the back and the trunk is definitely much larger and more useable, although the trunk opening is smaller in the M. --The handling on the RL was slightly better. Better directional stability (i.e. the steering is a little "nervous" on the M) and the SH 4WD cannot be beat. The RL is normally more in FWD, while the M is normally more in RWD. Makes a difference and is personal preference. I believe the ride is better on the M, although a little firmer. --RL had better mileage. I regularly got 28mpg on the highway vs 23 on the M. This is due to the much lower 5th gear and closer gear ratios in the M. The M has smoother acceleration and better shifting as a result, but the penalty is the gas mileage. Both cars need a six speed or maybe, in the case of the M, the Nissan CVT. --The NAV systems are a toss-up. The M's system is faster, has fewer annoying warning screens, and has friendlier views. The RL had the ability to call up a longer list of destinations, complete with phone numbers-really handy for calling a hotel from the road. --The quality of the M has been perfect to date. I was really put off by all of the recalls on the 2005RL. It never left me stranded, but dealing with all of the recalls was a real pain. It was not an Acura-like experience. Both the Acura and Infiniti dealers are 50 miles away. --Depreciation experience is yet to be determined for the M. My RL dropped 35% in value-trade vs. MSRP-in two years. Much was due to the rebates necessary to move the 2006 models. Not as bad as most American cars, but worse than my 2002 Lexus LS 430. --Styling. The RL does strongly resemble a Honda Accord. This was a major mistake in restyling the RL as was shortening the wheelbase by nearly 2 inches. On the other hand, the M is pretty non-descript as well. I am OK with the styling on both and am more interested in the drive and quality. --Mechanical. Both engines are works of art and smooth as butter. Same for the transmissions, with a slight edge to the M on upshifts, and a bigger edge to the M on downshifts. More engine sound with the M, which I like. It is closer to a BMW in character, while the RL is more like a cross between a Lexus and a Honda. Why can't American manufacturers build engines like these? --Miscellaneous. Like the push button start on the M. Like the back-up camera on the M-now on the 2007 RL. Dealer experience for both has been great. it's really nice to be treated well vs. the low quality at most American car dealerships. A few more standard electronic toys on the RL, none of which mattered to me. In summary, these are two great cars and you can't go wrong with either one. Preference should be largely based on the test drive, the price, and the proximity and quality of the dealer. |
|
|
Replying to: dano4 (Jan 24, 2007 3:59 am) Actually they can and they do. But most people who purchase in these classes are such dash strokers and badge snobs that they're put off by the American cars since they aren't squishy and posh enough. But GM's Northstar V8 and new 3.8L V6 are smooth. Ford's modular engines are smooth (when used in some applications) and its new 3.5L V6 is said to be smooth. Chrysler's HEMI V8 is smooth as butter and its 3.5L V6 is smooth (when used in the 300, at least it was in the 300M).
|
|
|
Replying to: tayl0rd (Jan 24, 2007 6:08 am) It's a darn shame because in so many other business areas we lead the world. I'm all for supporting American companies, but it's seems that Detroit is incapable of making a great product. Hondas, Nissans and Toyotas and all the Japanese vehicles have a large percentage of their cars made in the US anyway- so we who buy these cars are supporting ourselves as well.
|
|
|
Replying to: carfan28 (Feb 13, 2007 8:32 pm) I'd love to see some proof of that. The 300M for one, during its production, was rated as one of the most reliable cars in America (by CR, I believe). Did it leave you stranded when you rented it? Also keep in mind you're (for whatever reason) thinking an older, out-of-production $30K car should have an interior comparable to modern, $40K+ luxury cars. |
|
|
Replying to: dano4 (Jan 24, 2007 3:59 am) |
|
|
Just test drove the RL and the M35X back to back and took a long look at both. RL positives: SHAWD- drive system On the fly navigation system Better fuel economy MP3 player is incorporated with the car's audio system Quieter Cabin Smoother Ride Wood steering wheel option Run Flat tires option Proven good local dealer RL Negatives: No DVD player for playing movies while car is in park Worse resale value 2005 had many bugs Consumer Reports didn't give it a great recommendation I see old ladies and old men driving it No birdview navigation M35X Positives: DVD player plays movies while in park Better resale value 2006 Consumer Reports Top Pick Men drive the car 3D Birdsview Navigation Much better lease rate M35X Negatives: Worse fuel economy noisier cabin bouncier ride MP3 Player doesn't interact with the car audio system Navigation can only work when car's in park No wood steering wheel option available
|
|
|
Replying to: carfan28 (Feb 23, 2007 10:15 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Acura RL
Acura RL vs. Infiniti M35
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Acura RL
2010 Infiniti M35



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats