You are here:
Forums
Future Vehicles
Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions
Official unofficial 2006 Mercedes-Benz model line-up ![]()

17 messages, Last post on Dec 02, 2005 at 6:36 AM
You are in the Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h
This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Future Vehicles Host for Directions! discussion.
|
Replying to: ikramerica (Apr 22, 2005 9:32 am) |
|
|
Replying to: ikramerica (Apr 22, 2005 9:32 am) M |
|
Are they redesigning it, or is this just a mild refreshing?
|
|
|
Replying to: jchan2 (Apr 23, 2005 6:55 pm) The re-design will be for the 2008 model year in the U.S. M
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Apr 24, 2005 9:46 pm) Also, like just about every year it seems, there will probably be new wheels. Other than that, no changes but engines that I know of. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ikramerica (Apr 27, 2005 4:07 pm) Here are the specs on all three engines: C230 - 2496cc V6 - 201hp C280 - 2996cc V6 - 228hp C350 - 3498cc V6 - 268hp Why they just didn't call them C250,C300, and C350, considering none of those have been used before AFAIK, well only MB knows that. Also notice the C280 should be roughly comparable to the old C320, with slightly more HP, and slightly less torque but at a broader range. As for the C230 2.5, we'll see if it is better than the C230 1.8. It has more HP and less torque, but the HP comes at higher RPMs and the torque is only over a slightly broader range. My C230 2.3 still is superior IMHO, with 200lbft of torque and 192hp, and even then, I boosted output with a pulley kit. |
|
|
Replying to: ikramerica (Apr 29, 2005 4:18 pm) The V6 is simply a marketing ploy, esp. with that power curve...ever since we emerged from the oil-crisis cars of the 80s and early 90s (i.e. V8's with 180 HP and 4-cyl standard in just about everything) and as technology has improved, power is at a premium. A V6, with the same apparent performance, is more attractive to the masses than a supercharged, "wimpy" I4. One last question....does the pully kit void the warranty? Thanks....Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: delfonic (May 03, 2005 4:51 am) That said, my car is the 2.3l 230k, not the newer 1.8l. It had more headroom, so getting more power was easier. Your car has a higher power kompressor, so the pulley kits involved are more expensive, IIRC. Mine was a Kleeman pully modifier. Didn't add a new pulley, just added diameter to the existing one to increase the ratio, and replaced the belt with a longer one to compensate. Kleeman no longer offers this option, AFAIK. As for depreciation, you have a few things working against you, and a few for you. Against: old engine, high volume car, end of model year. For: 05 has newer body and suspension, 230 is already discounted C class compared to overpriced 320/350, so depreciation is less dramatic in real dollars. Just don't overload it with options if you care about depreciation. Or just load it up, drive the heck out of it, and enjoy. |
|
|
Replying to: ikramerica (Apr 29, 2005 4:18 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: drum (Dec 01, 2005 8:31 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Future Vehicles
Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions
Official unofficial 2006 Mercedes-Benz model line-up ![]()
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats