Sign In Join 



Toyota Corolla XRS vs Nissan Sentra SE-R SPEC V vs Mazda3

64 messages,  Last post on Oct 13, 2005 at 6:22 PM

You are in the Toyota Corolla Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Corolla, Nissan Sentra, Mazda MAZDA3, Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#45 of 64
Re: fair to compare xrs and the MZ3? [gib11] by giantkiller
Aug 30, 2005 (2:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gib11 (Aug 29, 2005 7:14 am)

On a climb and twisty road, I take the Corolla XRS anytime. And I dont even need to turn the radio on. The sound of the engine is music to my ears specially when I hit that 6th gear. What a blast to drive.
What did you guys said about break feel? Steering feel? Clutch feel?
Look at the comparo from Motor Trend. The Corolla XRS beat the hell out of the MZ3 in stopping distance, slalom speed, 0-60 and 1/4 mile. Now chew on that.
#46 of 64
Re: My summary [jmann98] by giantkiller
Aug 30, 2005 (4:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jmann98 (Aug 29, 2005 8:47 pm)

"it looses to the 3 during most of the rpm band, which is to say, 99% of the time"
I have a question. What about the 0-60MPH RPM band? Or the 1/4 mile RPM band. Your not paying attention or your talking base on your oppinion. Lets be objective. Check out the Motor Trend comparison between XRS and MZ3.
#47 of 64
Re: Thanks Pat! [biggus3] by giantkiller
Aug 30, 2005 (4:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: biggus3 (Jul 16, 2005 2:04 pm)

"The XRS doesnt "look" or feel sporty"-epinions review
Oh so you can judge a car by just the looks of it? And who is this reviewer?
You know what? Just drive the car.
#48 of 64
giantkiller by newcar31
Aug 31, 2005 (7:33 am)
Reply
Lets be objective. Check out the Motor Trend comparison between XRS and MZ3
 
Yes, please do be objective. The Motortrend test was performed with an automatic Mazda3.
 
You can throw the acceleration figures out the window because automatic vs manual comparisons are apples to oranges. Chew on that.
#49 of 64
Re: giantkiller [newcar31] by giantkiller
Aug 31, 2005 (2:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: newcar31 (Aug 31, 2005 7:33 am)

at least I've got figures. What do you have? "By the look of it its more sporty" and "It feels faster and more agile". Show me some figures and not just opinions.
 
Including in the comparison were a Cobalt LS/manual, Focus ZX4 ST/manual. Both have higher HP figure and have higher torque at much lower rpm range than a MAzda 3. XRS beat them all in performance figures.
#50 of 64
Re: giantkiller [giantkiller] by newcar31
Aug 31, 2005 (5:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: giantkiller (Aug 31, 2005 2:44 pm)

at least I've got figures. What do you have? "By the look of it its more sporty" and "It feels faster and more agile". Show me some figures and not just opinions.
 
I never said the stuff you put in quotes, but I will now. The Mazda3 looks WAY better and more sporty than any Corolla. Even the XRS is nerdy looking. Around town, it will feel faster than the high strung XRS.
 
As to your "figures", they're worthless. Like I said before, the comparison test that you're citing tested an automatic Mazda3 vs. a manual Corolla. Is it any wonder that the Corolla was faster? The handling figures from that test are relevent, but the acceleration figures are junk.
 
Here's a figure: Mazda3s hatchback 0-60: 7.4
#51 of 64
Re: giantkiller [newcar31] by giantkiller
Aug 31, 2005 (5:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: newcar31 (Aug 31, 2005 5:04 pm)

"The Mazda3 looks WAY better and more sporty than any Corolla. Even the XRS is nerdy looking".
So what ? Were talking about performance here. Isaid it before and I will say it again, Mazda 3 is the best looking compact sedan out there.
 
" Around town, it will feel faster than the high strung XRS."
 
Wrong again. See the figures from the comparison. 0-30, 0-40, 0-50, 0-60...I mean across the board, XRS posted the best times. And lets not say that the competition are all slush boxes. The Ford SVT and Cobalt LS are manuals and have more HP and Torque at even lower RPM comapared to Mazda 3. And they got beat. Do you expect Mazda 3 to come up with even better times than these 2 cars?
Face the facts.
By the way , XRS 0-60 is 7.1.
#52 of 64
Todd ... by mdaffron
Sep 01, 2005 (4:10 am)
Reply
You know which car's side I'm on here, BUT ...
 
I just looked up their test of the Mazda3 manual, and "giantkiller" is correct ... the Corolla XRS manual IS faster 0-60 and in the quarter-mile.
 
But that doesn't mean it's not a boring, ugly-looking car!
 
Meade
#53 of 64
Re: giantkiller [giantkiller] by newcar31
Sep 01, 2005 (5:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: giantkiller (Aug 31, 2005 5:50 pm)

"The Corolla XRS beat the hell out of the MZ3 in stopping distance, slalom speed, 0-60 and 1/4 mile. Now chew on that. "
 
Corolla XRS manual transmission:
  
0-60: 7.1
 
Mazda3s manual transmission hatchback:
 
0-60 7.4

 
Face the facts. Manual vs. Manual. Apples to apples. CHEW ON THAT. That's hardly "beating the hell out of".
 
Also----the sedan is lighter than the hatch, so it should be a little quicker than 7.4.
 
Once again, you IGNORE the fact that the Motortrend comparo used an automatic Mazda3 and a manual Corolla.
#54 of 64
Re: giantkiller [newcar31] by giantkiller
Sep 01, 2005 (3:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: newcar31 (Sep 01, 2005 5:57 am)

Okay, then I have a question for you. How will Mazda3 S 4 door/sedan/manual compare performance wise with a:
 
 Ford ZX4 ST/manual with 151HP5750RPM and 145lb-ft 4250RPM with a curb weight of 2803lbs
 
Cobalt LS/manual with 145HP5600RPM and 155lb-ft4000RPM with a curb weight of 2853lbs.

Messages Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement