Sign In Join 



Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread - READ ONLY

12297 messages,  Last post on Apr 13, 2007 at 11:55 AM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Volkswagen Passat, Mazda MAZDA6, Ford Fusion, Subaru Legacy, Saturn Aura, Sedan


Messages Page 1229 of 1231
1
...
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#12275 of 12297
Ford Fusion Challenge by virus
Feb 18, 2007 (8:07 pm)
I'm not quite certain why they didn't test the Camry SE instead of the XLE which is not sporty at all.
#12276 of 12297
Re: Ford Fusion Challenge [thegraduate] by neteng101
Feb 18, 2007 (8:12 pm)

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 18, 2007 7:23 pm)

The fuel economy penalty is usually very small - like 1-2 mpg, and this partly is due to the extra baggage for the AWD drivetrain.
 
There is reason to believe that VSC is better than AWD as a safety feature while cornering. And Toyota's VDIM is even better than VSC, though its only currently available on some Lexus models. Check out this post that compared AWD+VSC compared to RWD+VDIM...
 
http://www.clublexus.com/forums/showthread.php?t=152498
 
The Fusion AWD will be useful in slippery conditions in a straight line (think traction control operation). It still will never have the ability to correct for cornering forces and compensate like VSC can. The VSC available in the Accord/Camry is a better safety feature IMO. And further evolutions of VSC (such as VDIM) could be better than lower forms of AWD (with VSC).
#12277 of 12297
Re: Awkward... [thegraduate] by backy
Feb 18, 2007 (8:12 pm)

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 18, 2007 7:15 pm)

The Optima may be the sleeper here. Recently it's garnered very positive reviews from MT (a finalist for COTY), C/D (third to Altima and Accord, but not by a large margin), and CR. It's been praised for its strong I4, quality interior, and good blend of ride and handling. And it's one of the lowest-priced mid-sized cars. Even fuel economy (for the I4) is decent, with its 5-speed stick or slushbox. The major downsides are Kia's history of poor reliability and resale value, and ABS and ESC are both optional (and not even available on the LX MT). Also the IIHS side impact test scores aren't out yet. Otherwise it looks to me like a nice package. The styling is ho-hum, but nothing that is offensive.
#12278 of 12297
Re: Awkward... [backy] by elroy5
Feb 18, 2007 (8:37 pm)

Replying to: backy (Feb 18, 2007 8:12 pm)

My sister has a new Optima. I asked her how she liked it, and she said the only real complaint she has is the seats (not enough cushioning). She sounded satisfied with it, for the price.
#12279 of 12297
Vehicle Stability Control by kyrpto
Feb 19, 2007 (4:57 am)
VSC as Toyota/Lexus call it is the next big thing in safety. So much so thst the NIHS is reccomending that it be standard on all vehicles sold in America. It may end up saving more lives than seatbelts.
Having owned a Highlander AWD, Tundra D Cab 4WD, Scion xB, and now a Camry, all with VSC, I have personally experienced VSC in action. My '05 Tundra SR5 was ordered with it - now it is standard on all Tundras.
#12280 of 12297
Re: Ford Fusion Challenge [thegraduate] by akirby
Feb 19, 2007 (6:55 am)

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 18, 2007 7:23 pm)

Just to set the record straight, Ford's AWD system will shift power to the rear BEFORE slip is detected under certain circumstances such as higher throttle input. It's not just reactive like some of the other systems.
 
And the difference in the Fusion Challenge vs. all of the other media tests? This one was decided by regular drivers and vehicle owners, not by automotive journalists trying to sell magazines.
#12281 of 12297
Re: Ford Fusion Challenge [akirby] by thegraduate
Feb 19, 2007 (7:24 am)

Replying to: akirby (Feb 19, 2007 6:55 am)

And the difference in the Fusion Challenge vs. all of the other media tests? This one was decided by regular drivers and vehicle owners, not by automotive journalists trying to sell magazines.
 
And paid for and edited by Ford who is trying to sell Fusions, not magazines. I think I'd rather trust a magazine editor than one working for Ford. Or, just make the decision myself.
#12282 of 12297
Re: Ford Fusion Challenge [neteng101] by captain2
Feb 19, 2007 (7:40 am)

Replying to: neteng101 (Feb 18, 2007 8:12 pm)

There is reason to believe that VSC is better than AWD as a safety feature while cornering
actually the systems serve different purposes - a true AWD/4WD will actually improve driveability especially in slippery conditions and one reason why the Subaru is the 'national' car of New England. VSC/Trac can get in the way in those same road conditions and is construed as a safety feature in that it will prevent the driver from exceeding whatever the mfgr (or their lawyers) has decided is that vehicle's cornering limits. Depending on how the system is set, of course, it is more valuable as a safety feature on normal road conditions.
You mentioned VDIM which had an interesting effect on the cornering (slalom) ability in the Lexus GS. Slalom speed was reduced because the computer 'thought' that the course traffic cones were impending accidents and the car shutdown before a competitive result could be achieved. The Toyota/Lexus systems, of course, not user defeatable.
#12283 of 12297
Re: Ford Fusion Challenge [captain2] by jeffyscott
Feb 19, 2007 (8:15 am)

Replying to: captain2 (Feb 19, 2007 7:40 am)

"VSC/Trac can get in the way in those same road conditions..."
 
You keep saying this same sort of thing, but I think you are mistaken. ESC does help in slippery conditions.
 
It also can improve the vehicles capabilities in some situations. I believe that the only time it is detrimental is if you are stuck in deep snow or want to plow through deep snow and, therefore, want to spin the wheels, this is the only time our manual suggests you might want to turn it off temporarily.
 
ESC is able to apply braking to individual wheels, you can not do this yourself. This can improve the vehicles cornering or accident avoidance abilities.
 
Perhaps Toyota just has a crappy system. Or perhaps the sloppy Toyota handling leads them to having to have a more intrusive system.
 
We have a VW and their system certainly does help in slippery conditions. I don't think it has ever engaged itself in any other circumstances. I did have to make a very sudden lane change at high speed once, but I think the car did it without the ESC coming on...it certainly did not reduce my speed.
#12284 of 12297
Re: Ford Fusion Challenge [thegraduate] by akirby
Feb 19, 2007 (8:19 am)

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 19, 2007 7:24 am)

So why did Ford hire C&D to run the test? Why didn't they just run their own test? That would have been cheaper. No car magazine would ever run this type of test (with 600 regular drivers) so how is Ford supposed to get this kind of real world test without paying for it? As long as the participants aren't paid it's a perfectly valid test.

Messages Page 1229 of 1231
1
...
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement