#12248 of 12297 Re: Consumer reports on the Aura [1487] by scape2

Feb 18, 2007 (2:00 pm)

Replying to: 1487 (Feb 14, 2007 7:53 am)

motor Trend had a review of the Aura, I'm sure its a nice car. But Motor Trend made reference to the .2 second difference in 0-60 times between the Fusion and Aura... Faster, ok, but can you count to .2 seconds?
 
More features? like what?

Replies to this message:

• m1miata (Feb 18, 2007 8:44 pm)

#12249 of 12297 Re: Price [1487] by scape2

Feb 18, 2007 (2:02 pm)

Replying to: 1487 (Feb 14, 2007 7:56 am)

"Most of those "unreliable" domestics you are speaking of arent even unreliable per CR's tables in the new car issue."
 
Another place to see all those "unreliable Fords/GM products is MSN reliability data.. This will open your eyes!

Replies to this message:

• elroy5 (Feb 18, 2007 2:18 pm)

#12251 of 12297 Re: Price [neteng101] by scape2

Feb 18, 2007 (2:11 pm)

Replying to: neteng101 (Feb 14, 2007 9:43 am)

What?? Fusion has nothing in common with the Taurus. Get it straight man! The 3.0 Duratec in the Taurus does NOT have VVT for one! The suspension and drive train are not Taurus either!
 
As far as your 30 year track record with the Accord.. Better go back and look at all those recalls for transmissions, electrical issues and more over those past 30 years The Accord is in no way perfect if you did your homework. I dumped my 2000 Accord for issues, that is why I'll never buy another one. Honda= overpriced, overrated and overdone for me!

#12252 of 12297 Re: Price [scape2] by elroy5

Feb 18, 2007 (2:18 pm)

Replying to: scape2 (Feb 18, 2007 2:02 pm)