Sign In Join 

Ford Mustang (2005) vs. 2005 Pontiac GTO

2056 messages,  Last post on May 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM

You are in the Ford Mustang Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Ford Mustang, Pontiac GTO, Coupe, Convertible


Messages Page 204 of 207
1
...
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2025 of 2056
Re: Whats a GTO? [mschmal] by schufflerbot
Jul 16, 2007 (3:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mschmal (Jul 14, 2007 10:29 am)

precisely.
 
i love mine for that simple fact. i cannot count the number of people who nearly cause an accident trying to get my attention so they can ask, "what kind of car is that?" (i have stripped all the badging off of mine)
 
as i posted previously, i love mustangs. ive owned one, ive worked on several and i never blow one off as an easy kill until its in my rearview mirror. (dont put words in my mouth, ive been toasted by some mustangs that look like theyre about to fall apart and loved it)
 
i purchased the GTO over the mustang because of the rarity, they styling and the power. i completely understand wanting to show off your power, as the mustang does, but for this time around i wanted something that not everyone could identify. i wanted a sleeper and no, the term 'sleeper' does not mean ugly - it means something that doesnt necessarily look like it will blow the doors off of a viper.
 
i have modded my GTO with a few bolt ons and have plans to further the process and arrive somewhere in the 550-575 rwhp range. plenty for me.
 
at the 329 rwhp marker i had no problems putting 2 cars on stock 06 stang GT's.
 
now i have 2 cars on them by the end of second gear... and i dont stop walking them until i decide to let off the gas.
 
bottom line, i chose my car because it fit neatly into all the categories i was looking into. the mustang is a great car, i just didnt want to spend 50K+ for a GT500 when i could spend $28 for an 04 and with $2k in mods beat up a GT500 like it was an old lady.
 
to each his own.
#2026 of 2056
GT V. GTO by vertical3
Jul 16, 2007 (5:15 pm)
Reply
Yeah, I wish FoMoCo would go ahead and commit to a full run of offering a 302. Supply and demand (along with the nostalgia of finally being able to afford a Shelby) keeps the prices where the dealers like it. But the run ends in 09 (and everybody who already owns one is hedging on a climb in value).
 
Honestly with the big increase in traffic enforcement here in South Florida, I just like running thru the gears, get a push in the seat, and listening to the exhaust.
 
Like I said before we'll both be allies once the Camaro and Challenger show up.
#2027 of 2056
yup. by schufflerbot
Jul 17, 2007 (4:42 am)
Reply
well said, vertical.
 
and yes, we will have to join the same team when mopar takes center stage for a while.
 
on a side note, i dont think the upgraded traffic/street racing enforcement is solely FL's to deal with. Were seeing it here in TX as well - more tickets, more cops and on saturday night you had better be careful if you have a 'loud' exhaust.
#2028 of 2056
Same Block, different configuration... by theatasigma
Aug 11, 2007 (8:55 pm)
Reply
Re: GT V. GTO [vertical3] by sensai
Not sure what point you are trying to make. For starters, the 4.6 is shared across many Ford cars/trucks, so technically it is borrowed too. And what exactly would be the point of handicapping GTOs with a smaller displacement (yet physically bigger and heavier) engine or one that made less power? Shouldn't you be clamoring for Ford to release a higher hp V8 in the GTs and not for GM to release less powerful engines in there cars...

 
While the 4.6 has been around since the early 90's, the configuration of 4.6 for the Mustang GT unique to it. Up until the 2006 year, only the GT used the 4.6L 3 Valve Engine configuration (The V8 Explorers now share it too, but it has less horsepower for the Explorers).
 
The problem I have with the GTO is it is a cool car (prefer Fords myself) but when I look at the lineup I find them uninspired. Yeah it is nice to have a car that goes incredibly fast, but I need more than that to justify buying it. If I was to get a decent performance car from GM, I would most likely choose an Impala SS over a GTO. Now if someone was to give me a GTO I wouldn't turn it down...
 
TS
#2029 of 2056
Re: Same Block, different configuration... [theatasigma] by vertical3
Aug 12, 2007 (5:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: theatasigma (Aug 11, 2007 8:55 pm)

Well the news out that the Challenger is available with up to 425 HP is irritating. Rumbles are GM is having issues wanting to bring out the Camaro within budget and still be a Pony/GTO/MoPar killer.
 
Wouldn't be cool if the Pontiac R & D guys solicited existing GTO owners for input on body style, ergonomics, and power packages?
 
Might get some ideas on a "retro" look that FoMoCo found so successful with the 05+ S197 platform that is today's Mustang.
#2030 of 2056
Re: Same Block, different configuration... [vertical3] by baggs32
Aug 12, 2007 (7:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: vertical3 (Aug 12, 2007 5:28 pm)

Wouldn't be cool if the Pontiac R & D guys solicited existing GTO owners for input on body style, ergonomics, and power packages?
 
Kind of like Ford did with the current Mustang? They let Mustang owners/fans give a lot of input in the current iteration and it paid off I think we can all agree.
#2031 of 2056
Re: Same Block, different configuration... [theatasigma] by jae5
Aug 31, 2007 (1:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: theatasigma (Aug 11, 2007 8:55 pm)

I don't mean to start anything (haven't posted in a long time but read this from time to time), and I can't believe I'm doing this, agreeing with Sensai but he is correct. The 4.6 was first intro'd in the 91 ~ 92 time frame in the CV/GM/Continental FWD and was the 2-valver. The Mustang got the motor in the 96 timeframe, with better intake/exhaust, but was the same motor. And the 4.6 4-valve DOHC motor for the Cobra (also the last Mach 1) came from the Mark VIII; believe it was called In-tech.
 
The 3-valve didn't come out until the current-gen Mustang came out, but the trucks got it as well. All the press may have been on the Mustang but the 3-valve was also on the trucks.
 
What I don't like about the 4.6L is that it seemed to be stuck in HP-Limbo for a long time and only now is making 300 (or 320 depending on who you talk too). And it seems that you have to do an SC or something heavy to it to make it scoot; you just can't do a cam and/or head swap to increase performance like on an LS-engine. It seemed from day 1 the LS-family was similar to the traditional SB where you can do simple (semi-simple) traditional bolt-ons and get good gains; you can't seem to do that to the 4.6L.
 
Remember, the 4.6/5.4L is just like the LS-X engines, they're corporate, kind of like the 302/351W & the 350 workhorses.
 
Happy hunting
#2032 of 2056
Re: Same Block, different configuration... [jae5] by vertical3
Sep 01, 2007 (7:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jae5 (Aug 31, 2007 1:09 pm)

One thing with the 4.6 is there's plenty of room to work work with. Adding a Vortech or Magnacharger SC can put you 500HP.
 
Bring back the Boss 302.....
#2033 of 2056
Blank Palette by mschmal
Sep 04, 2007 (3:47 am)
Reply
Definately something to keep in mind. The 4.6 may not have high output from the factory, but Ford is not exactly maxing this engine out either. A lot of potential growth is left for the owner to find.
 
Keep in mind that the Mustang is a price leader.
 
Mark.
#2034 of 2056
Re: Same Block, different configuration... [vertical3] by jae5
Sep 06, 2007 (11:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: vertical3 (Sep 01, 2007 7:02 pm)

Oh I agree, but I just wish you didn't have to do the SC. I mean, beyond the TB, exhaust, what other simple or semi-simple bolt-ons can you do to the stock 4.6 to get some real gains (please, no NOx)? It just seems this sucker should be putting out more without the need to SC it. That's what has always bothered me about the mod motor. If there's more power on the table unleash it man!! And like the Poncho owners here have stated, they can just do the same thing, or do a semi-simple hot-cam or head swap and away they go.
 
And I will admit you can get some crazy gains from the last-gen Cobra. Just doing a plug-n-play tune on the ECM gets some great gains; swap the pulley and you get another nice boost (no pun intended).
 
Sorry for that Mustang-only side-track...

Messages Page 204 of 207
1
...
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?
Connect with Facebook Sign In Using Your Facebook AccountNew!

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement