- #18674 of 23846
-
Re: New> [qbrozen]
by andys120
-
Oct 20, 2008 (11:22 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: qbrozen (Oct 20, 2008 8:49 am)
Yep, it's the new Alfa 149.
|
- #18675 of 23846
-
Ragtop>
by andys120
-
Oct 20, 2008 (11:22 am)
-
|
|
- #18676 of 23846
-
Re: Ragtop> [andys120]
by kyfdx HOST
-
Oct 20, 2008 (11:25 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Oct 20, 2008 11:22 am)
'66 Shelby GT350 convertible?
|
- #18677 of 23846
-
Re: Ragtop> [kyfdx]
by texases
-
Oct 20, 2008 (12:28 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Oct 20, 2008 11:25 am)
Is it more like a '68 GT350?
|
- #18678 of 23846
-
Re: Ragtop> [kyfdx]
by stephen987
-
Oct 20, 2008 (12:45 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: kyfdx (Oct 20, 2008 11:25 am)
There were no Shelby GT350 convertibles in '65-66. Those first-generation cars were really homologation specials--production racers, essentially, with the exception of the GT350H rent-a-racer which had an automatic. 1967 was a transition year--new body style, but I'm pretty sure there still wasn't a convertible. Ergo, it's gotta be a '68.
|
- #18679 of 23846
-
Re: New> [andys120]
by qbrozen
-
Oct 20, 2008 (1:00 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Oct 20, 2008 11:22 am)
buttt... where is the pic from? I searched and couldn't find one that looked exactly like that.
edit: found it on motortrend. Weird. not sure why it didn't show up for me before.
|
- #18680 of 23846
-
Re: Ragtop> [texases]
by andys120
-
Oct 20, 2008 (1:09 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: texases (Oct 20, 2008 12:28 pm)
It's a '68 but it's the 500KR according to this.
|
- #18681 of 23846
-
Re: Ragtop> [andys120]
by texases
-
Oct 20, 2008 (1:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Oct 20, 2008 1:09 pm)
And according to the trim stripe on the side
|
- #18682 of 23846
-
??>
by andys120
-
Oct 20, 2008 (2:20 pm)
-
|
|
- #18683 of 23846
-
Re: ??> [andys120]
by texases
-
Oct 20, 2008 (2:34 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: andys120 (Oct 20, 2008 2:20 pm)
De-badged Ford Scorpio? About 1990? Didn't we get that as a Merkur?
|