Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
1379 messages, Last post on Oct 01, 2009 at 10:54 AM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Sep 27, 2007 8:20 am) The Speed 3 is really nice inside and I'd say it's a few notches above my older Rex, but I haven't checked out the new WRX and it looks like it will need some mods right out of the box to kill all that body roll it's got. FWD is not my first choice but the Speed 3 looks really good. I'll take oversteer which I'm used to over understeer although I like my setup to be a bit neutral with a bit of oversteer. |
|
|
http://newsletter.autoexpress.co.uk/c/14s2ea5Bnoeq5 Energy-wasting AWD combines w/ lack of steering feel. At least it's got good ride comfort: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/210611/subaru_impreza.html The new Euro-built Saturn -- lack of multi-link rear suspension means a comfy ride is not even remotely possible if the handling has to remain decent, steering-feel sucks, too: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/210614/vauxhall_astra.html With the Focus-II platform, the Mazda has the highest "driving experience" rating here, but its ride is not tuned comfortably the way Focus' are: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/210612/mazda_3.html |
|
|
|
| I don't put any stock in magazine reviews. They say the Si has a good interior - it doesn't to my eyes. I'll visit a Scooby dealer soon to take a peak at the WRX. If it's up to par with my old 2003 Protege ES, then it's more than adequate to be a daily car. | |
still has the best-looking interior, at least from the brochure 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Oct 05, 2007 7:55 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Oct 05, 2007 7:56 am) man blueguy, sometimes i've wondered if you have ever peeped inside of any other car that the civic competes with. Most would agree it has a high quality interior. You may not 'personally' like it, but to call it garbage is a bit harsh, and totally contradictory to the long history of quality interiors that the civic has had.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: eldaino (Oct 09, 2007 7:59 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Oct 09, 2007 9:09 am) Oh, definitely not. I wish we could go back from electronic controls for the ventilation, etc.. to the levers which often get very stiff to adjust (as in my grandparents' 1997 Civic LX) where you could see the metal pieces attached to the mechanical parts back in the control unit of the A/C controls, don't you? Or maybe we can use the much smaller, more thinly padded although-not-comfortably-firm seats from those cars too!  I personally haven't found a fit/finish/tactile quality problem in the new Civic. Just a differing opinion. 
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Oct 09, 2007 11:17 am) But my '00 Civc hatch has one soft touch (i.e., doesn't click), for A/C or recirculate, that had to be visually checked for on & off, & can't even be read under direct sun light, especially the indicator lights got dimmer as the car aged! Ditto my Focus ST, & even worse, the number of buttons found on (the premium Focus-II) Volvo S40/V50's fancy-looking "TV remote-like" super-thin center stack.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Oct 09, 2007 7:19 pm) I was actually talking about the Civic of the 80s and early 90s (which is what the previous person had referenced) which had levers. You gotta check those visually too. BTW, I have a 1996 Accord which has similar controls to the 90-93 models. The mechanical knob in that car binds easily and breaks the knob (I'm on number 4). I prefer the electronic knobs better.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
2010 Volkswagen GTI
2011 Honda Civic
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
