Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
1379 messages, Last post on Oct 01, 2009 at 10:54 AM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Aug 17, 2007 9:07 pm) Really, what it comes down to for me - VW is screwing over buyers by only offering AWD with the V6. I'd obviously prefer RWD and a chipped 2.0T but alas that's not even made. The GTI is fun, but the FWD angle will probably keep me from buying. I love my Cooper S but every day at least a few times per drive I'm reminded why I loathe FWD. |
|
|
130i M Sport 6-cyl RWD BMW vs... http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209950/alfa_brera_v6_v_rivals.html- - W/ the engine output well snubbed "in the first four gears" & "if you didn’t know better, you might think the MPS was four-wheel drive." "On smooth roads the ride is fine, tightly checked by the lowered suspension but with acceptable suppleness, but on lumpier B-roads the nose can start bobbing as it gets out of phase with quick-fire sequences of mild bumps. Attack a choppy corner and the steering’s limited feel isolates you from the mild scrabble that ensues as the inside tyre tugs at the apex, while grip is impressive once the nose has tucked into the turn. It’s a very nose-led experience, the rear refusing to budge even when diving in hard on the brakes. High marks for effectiveness, then, and a middling score for involvement." So, lack of steering-feel fun & lack of oversteer fun, but heck "on the laptop screen: best lap 1:31.3, a new record." http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209952/mazda_3.html All its rivals "here have transverse engines with end-on gearboxes, which means their front wheels can’t be pushed as far forward and their weight distribution is nose-heavy." Being the only RWD platform here & also having normally aspirated large displacement means "the engine is sensitive to the lightest throttle pressure" & therefore fishtail drift is just around the corner. Subjectively, all the rivals here including the more powerful 4-cyl turbo FWD Mazda3 can't have this kind of fun. But the BMW "remains a flawed car though, the feel of its chassis occasionally vague, its ride confounded by particularly lumpen B-roads." So it still can't trump in both ride & handling the way the Focus can. http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209954/bmw_1series.html Here comes the AWD GTI, or 4-cyl turbo R32 -- the Audi S3. Competent fool-proof handling combines w/ more "boosts from lower revs" than the Mazda engine. http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209953/audi_s3.html I think the Alfa is the only good-looking car here. But w/ "feel-free steering" & still has a "ride that’s firm and busy at a detail level", this not so agile car... http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209950/alfa_brera_v6_v_rivals.html- -
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Aug 30, 2007 9:50 pm)  I swear an AWD 2.0T GTI would be a blast. Some simply tuning...yummy.
|
|
|
|
| A year and a few days, and 17,500 trouble free, hi reving miles. This car is a blast, and squeak/rattle free. Most fun car I have ever owned. | |
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 31, 2007 10:22 am) as far as the 3 go....my take on it. the gti is the most balanced of them all. my little brother (well we're both in our 30s) has a mazdaspeed3 and he swears by it. i actually considered it, but i love VWs. the interiors just seem more refined. honda makes a great car, but just not a big fan of the styling.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: nectar (Sep 04, 2007 10:15 am) I can't accelerate hard out of corners and I can't accelerate hard from a stand still. AWD solves both.
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Sep 04, 2007 1:07 pm) |
|
|
But even if you upgrade to a much more hardcore sporty setting on a RWD platform w/ a meaty normally aspirated V8 lighter than a BMW 6-cyl & placed mostly behind the front axle really going to get you anywhere (fun)? http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/firstdrives/210130/bmw_m3.html "However, its stiff settings don’t cope so well with rough surfaces, where it proves edgy, with slightly numb steering. The M3’s engineering excellence should mean it’s a highly involving car to drive – but it doesn’t have the same ability to entertain at all speeds as Audi’s RS4, for instance. While technically brilliant, the BMW is less supple and engaging." |
|
|
|
I need something with more TORK.
|
|
|
Replying to: carfanatic007 (Sep 16, 2007 5:28 pm) wow. just wow. so i'm assuming that when you posted the bulk of your comments, you had yet to try the vw out huh? so do you still think the si is the 'best'? i personally probably would have kept the si, just for the handling. the gli is a good handler too, but its not flat through corners. the mkV's biggest weakness imo. but the torque is nice. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
2010 Volkswagen GTI
2011 Honda Civic
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
