Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
1379 messages, Last post on Oct 01, 2009 at 10:54 AM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 17, 2007 12:08 pm) maybe in 2011 when the new r36 comes out, maybe they'll make a 4 door version. |
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 17, 2007 12:08 pm) If you want 6-cyl AWD, then place the engine mostly behind the front axle & start out w/ a RWD platform such as the G35 or the BMW 3-series. But factory sport package might not be available. If you like the heavy-weight new BMW 3-series, then be my guess & take the R32, which has a more substantial deliberate stable but less lively feeling than the FWD 4-cyl GTI & thus is even more distant to the light-weight Mini Cooper. The expensive R32 is really just a car w/ an invincible fool-proof handling good enough for unskillful drivers living in the snow belt, but not much fun. To me, the Mazdaspeed3 is already too hard edged, let alone the lunatic-handling Mini Cooper. I'd rather drive a softer-edge (but still light weight) car w/ 16" rims & do drifts more often.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 16, 2007 10:46 pm) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Aug 17, 2007 9:07 pm) Really, what it comes down to for me - VW is screwing over buyers by only offering AWD with the V6. I'd obviously prefer RWD and a chipped 2.0T but alas that's not even made. The GTI is fun, but the FWD angle will probably keep me from buying. I love my Cooper S but every day at least a few times per drive I'm reminded why I loathe FWD. |
|
|
130i M Sport 6-cyl RWD BMW vs... http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209950/alfa_brera_v6_v_rivals.html- - W/ the engine output well snubbed "in the first four gears" & "if you didn’t know better, you might think the MPS was four-wheel drive." "On smooth roads the ride is fine, tightly checked by the lowered suspension but with acceptable suppleness, but on lumpier B-roads the nose can start bobbing as it gets out of phase with quick-fire sequences of mild bumps. Attack a choppy corner and the steering’s limited feel isolates you from the mild scrabble that ensues as the inside tyre tugs at the apex, while grip is impressive once the nose has tucked into the turn. It’s a very nose-led experience, the rear refusing to budge even when diving in hard on the brakes. High marks for effectiveness, then, and a middling score for involvement." So, lack of steering-feel fun & lack of oversteer fun, but heck "on the laptop screen: best lap 1:31.3, a new record." http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209952/mazda_3.html All its rivals "here have transverse engines with end-on gearboxes, which means their front wheels can’t be pushed as far forward and their weight distribution is nose-heavy." Being the only RWD platform here & also having normally aspirated large displacement means "the engine is sensitive to the lightest throttle pressure" & therefore fishtail drift is just around the corner. Subjectively, all the rivals here including the more powerful 4-cyl turbo FWD Mazda3 can't have this kind of fun. But the BMW "remains a flawed car though, the feel of its chassis occasionally vague, its ride confounded by particularly lumpen B-roads." So it still can't trump in both ride & handling the way the Focus can. http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209954/bmw_1series.html Here comes the AWD GTI, or 4-cyl turbo R32 -- the Audi S3. Competent fool-proof handling combines w/ more "boosts from lower revs" than the Mazda engine. http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209953/audi_s3.html I think the Alfa is the only good-looking car here. But w/ "feel-free steering" & still has a "ride that’s firm and busy at a detail level", this not so agile car... http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/209950/alfa_brera_v6_v_rivals.html- -
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Aug 30, 2007 9:50 pm)  I swear an AWD 2.0T GTI would be a blast. Some simply tuning...yummy.
|
|
|
|
| A year and a few days, and 17,500 trouble free, hi reving miles. This car is a blast, and squeak/rattle free. Most fun car I have ever owned. | |
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 31, 2007 10:22 am) as far as the 3 go....my take on it. the gti is the most balanced of them all. my little brother (well we're both in our 30s) has a mazdaspeed3 and he swears by it. i actually considered it, but i love VWs. the interiors just seem more refined. honda makes a great car, but just not a big fan of the styling.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: nectar (Sep 04, 2007 10:15 am) I can't accelerate hard out of corners and I can't accelerate hard from a stand still. AWD solves both.
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Sep 04, 2007 1:07 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
2010 Volkswagen GTI
2011 Honda Civic
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
