Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
1379 messages, Last post on Oct 01, 2009 at 10:54 AM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Aug 14, 2007 8:28 pm) totally agree. but i do think the steering wheel itself is a bit nicer on the gti.  The Euro Civic may be great on the track, & in many cases, beating the GTI, C-1 Focus, Mazdaspeed3, etc., but that's only when they didn't care about the ride. i've read that the regular euro civic rides great, if not as uber comfy as the mkV. Its when it comes to bumps that its nothing to write home about. same as the type r, but to a more noticable extent.
|
|
|
Replying to: creakid1 (Aug 14, 2007 8:28 pm) When it comes to reviews on vehicles, I do not hold CR all that high. I prefer to read Road and Track or Motor Trend for their opinion on how the car performs. Better yet, I like to see for myself. The only thing I find CR good for is long term reliability reports. They are fairly accurate in that respect. |
|
|
|
|
Don't bother with the mags and do your own driving. No matter what people say, I couldn't live with boyracer feel of the Si or MS3. The lack of power in the Si, skateboard ride and bargain basement interior didn't hit for me but no reviews mention these things. Likewise, the busy ride of the MS3, the buzzy exhaust and the horrid clutch/gearing aren't brought up in reviews of the fast Mazda. Drive the cars on your own and totally ignore the mags. They offer nothing of value.
|
|
|
Replying to: eldaino (Aug 15, 2007 6:33 am) the regular euro civic rides great? That was my point -- no way! Regular versions don't have lowered suspension, & the dyamics of this Euro-spec will be handicapped badly by its low-tech suspension. OK, take a look at this interesting Autoexpress 4-car comparison. Low-tech suspension made it trumped in trunk space, which also made it trumped in...: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/204821/honda_civic.html "The precise pedals and steering are light enough to be easy to use around town, but also prove impressively responsive. That bodes well for the car’s driver appeal, and on the whole the Honda lives up to expectations. It’s grippy and well balanced, although it doesn’t tackle corners with the same panache as the Focus. Ride comfort is entirely acceptable, but all three rivals excel in that area, and the Civic comes across as rather sporting in comparison, with the dampers failing to fully isolate rough road surfaces." Best driver's car in the 61-hatch comparison test: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/204822/ford_focus.html "The suspension is so well oiled, gliding over surfaces where its rivals, even the Auris (new Corolla), fidget and fight. It takes the sting out of rough roads, is never caught off-balance and carves through corners cleanly and effortlessly. In terms of driver appeal, the Focus is by far the most polished and involving car in this test – and that’s true of every single model in the 61-strong hatchback range." Comfort is priority: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/204823/volkswagen_golf.html "The Golf doesn’t relish being hurried. It has a more laid back character than the zesty Civic, and is at its best when cruising at high speed. On motorways, very little wind noise penetrates the cabin. But on bumpy roads, the softer suspension means there’s more roll and wallow. In short, the VW isn’t as well controlled as its rivals here, and feels slightly lethargic. It turns in accurately enough, and the speed-sensitive steering is well weighted, but compared to the Ford it’s not a particularly engaging car to drive." Redesigned but still behind in "driving technology": http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/204820/toyota_auris.html "The stiff bodyshell has enabled the company to make the most of the new suspension set-up. Initially, it seems firm – roll is minimal through corners and the whole car is tightly controlled. As a result, the Auris is rarely caught out, and that means it’s reassuring to drive. It can’t match the Focus’s sparkling chassis and soothing road manners, despite being equipped with Toyota’s most positive gearshift since the Celica and offering very well weighted steering. But the new hatch is a big step forward nevertheless. Yet although the Auris will be welcomed by undemanding drivers, it’s flawed. The steering is uninformative, the A-pillars are intrusive and it weaves under hard braking, with the pedal soon becoming mushy underfoot." Looks like this Brit magazine thinks that buyers of econo boxes are cheapskates & should pick the Civic as 1st place due to the biggest engine's max pwr but w/ best fuel economy & interior/trunk room. Since we care about driving experience more, you should do your own ranking: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/grouptests/204819/family_hatchbacks.html- - - - - - - - - - - "Each rival here tested the newcomer in a particular area – the Honda Civic has unrivalled design and packaging, the Ford Focus the best ride and handling, while no other hatch is as well built or classy as the VW Golf. The Auris was found wanting in each department." So these Control Blades in the (C-1) Focus can easily "slice up" Euro Civic's (& the new Euro Corolla's) cheap suspension in both the ride AND the handling departments. Why would you tolerate a worse ride while the handling is not exactly better? |
|
| That "61-strong hatchback range" actually means that there are 61 different Focus hatch, not 61 different kinds of cars. My bad. | |
|
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 15, 2007 9:15 am) Thank you!!! My sentiments exactly... 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: 600kgolfgt (Aug 16, 2007 10:54 am) Thank you!!! My sentiments exactly... I dunno that I'd completely ignore them. They can point out some things you might not notice on a test drive; little details that would annoy you later (or delight you later). Things the average buyer might not think about such as gooseneck trunk hinges versus struts, how much available cubby space there is, how a car handles in certain conditions that you won't experience in a test drive, etc... These reviews offer some value, but should not be the end-all.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Aug 16, 2007 10:25 pm) The cars in this segment, try to find them mentioning negatives of the Civic, GTI and MS3. They don't. 99% of car reviews now are fluff designed to hit the highpoints of vehicles and avoid saying anything too negative as it might have an LA-Times-effect (GM pulled advertising because the reviewer eviscerated GM). Even Edmunds delivers total fluff pieces now (and more often than not reviews silly vehicles like Lambos and Ferraris). Furthermore, what's a negative for some, is a positive for others. Read a CR review of a 3 series and they call the car rough riding with a sport package...strange, I'd call it sponge-cake soft. The only way to know if a car is right for you - drive it. The rest of it you can learn on your own without a bought and sold auto "journalist" whitewashing glaring deficiencies.
|
|
|
They really criticized the right things VERY OFTEN? So do many British magazines. I was a sucker when I bought the Twin Cam '90 Protege, b/c Road&Track said it's so quiet on the fwy you better watch out for speeding tickets. Since when have heard of a quiet Protege? It was after I bought the car did C$D finally had a complete road test & pointed out the car fishtails on the fwy ramp & gave'em a "heart-in-the-mouth moment"! Of course, I already discovered this characteristic myself. |
|
|
Replying to: blueguydotcom (Aug 16, 2007 10:46 pm) the mazdaspeed3 has been called out on its less than perfect shifter and occasinal cheesines (not in build quality but in appearance) of its interior. the gti has been called out on its excess body roll and its not so great manual, and much higher than the competition price. the si has been called out on its lack of torque, its dash design, and sometimes its dbw lag. these are all things i've read in various magazines, not just limited to one. you don't like the boy racer thing...well aside from the exhaust note (which may not be to your taste and thats ok), the si does not look tremendously different than a regular civic, especially when clad in a color available on other trim levls of civic. Honda's interiors have always been praised for their build quality, and nice materials (even if its not as nice as the gti's), so this is just a personal vendetta you have against the si that few have a problem with. you seem to think that the ms3 is riddled with the same 'image' of boy racer, and you obviously didn't like the gti enough to buy it over your mini. what exactly do you want!? 
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazdaspeed3 vs. VW V GTI vs. Civic Si
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
2010 Volkswagen GTI
2011 Honda Civic
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
