Sign In Join 



The Future Of The Manual Transmission

5807 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 7:20 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Transmission


Messages Page 500 of 581
1
...
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
...
581
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4990 of 5807
Re: commute update [nippononly] by boaz47
Oct 13, 2008 (5:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Oct 12, 2008 8:48 pm)

And you may be right. But I believe heavy traffic is what has caused so many commuters to switch. Of that 90 plus percent of Automatic drivers I would venture to guess most of them are commuters. Commuting is not done for pleasure it is the prime point A to point B driving. It is also the biggest contributor to cup holders and sound systems I think. Ask yourself why the Toyota 5 door you complained about was released as an automatic? Is it not just what you would expect for a commuter?
#4991 of 5807
Re: commute update [boaz47] by nippononly
Oct 13, 2008 (7:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Oct 13, 2008 5:43 am)

Yes, but a lack of an available manual is just what I would expect from Toyota. If it were a Honda it would have a stick as standard equipment, despite the fact that it is a prime candidate for commuter duty.
#4992 of 5807
Re: commute update [nippononly] by boaz47
Oct 13, 2008 (3:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Oct 13, 2008 7:26 am)

"Yes, but a lack of an available manual is just what I would expect from Toyota. If it were a Honda it would have a stick as standard equipment, despite the fact that it is a prime candidate for commuter duty. "
 
But the question is why did Toyota release it as a Automatic? If commuting hasn't contributed to Toyota's marketing of automatics in commuter cars what has? It should be easy to see the consumer is voting with their wallet and Toyota wants to get as much of that vote as they can. If Manuals were better for commuting for the average person then by logic more commuters would drive manuals. But they don't and Toyota must have figured that out.
#4993 of 5807
Re: commute update [boaz47] by nippononly
Oct 13, 2008 (8:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Oct 13, 2008 3:07 pm)

The only thing Toyota has figured out is how to squeeze every ounce of profit from the production process by streamlining it and maximizing efficiency. This is not a process that benefit consumers, it only reduces the options they have available in order to benefit Toyota's bottom line.
#4994 of 5807
Re: commute update [boaz47] by plekto
Oct 13, 2008 (10:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Oct 13, 2008 5:43 am)

I find that a manual is far better in rush hour traffic if you drive it properly. This means NOT driving it like an automatic. Leave it in 2nd gear and let it wind up and down and shift as infrequently as possible. Sure, gaps of 30-50 ft might open up but it's no big deal, since you're not really on the brakes all the time and can easily just give it a bit more gas when you need to.
 
Oh - the largest vehilcle with a manual transmission other than the big GMC and Ford commercial trucks (GMC 4500 for instance) are the larger cargo vans(van conversion, of course... heh). Second are the larger full size pickups. A few are still available with manuals.
 
For cars, though, You're stuck with essentially Volvos, Saabs, the Cadillac CTS, and a few specific BMWs and Mercedes (note the European theme?)
#4995 of 5807
Re: commute update [plekto] by boaz47
Oct 14, 2008 (7:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: plekto (Oct 13, 2008 10:23 pm)

"I find that a manual is far better in rush hour traffic if you drive it properly. This means NOT driving it like an automatic. Leave it in 2nd gear and let it wind up and down and shift as infrequently as possible. Sure, gaps of 30-50 ft might open up but it's no big deal, since you're not really on the brakes all the time and can easily just give it a bit more gas when you need to."
 
My point is still, if manuals were easier to drive or better, as some contend, then why have more than 90 percent of American Consumers decided to pay extra for an commuter car with an Automatic? You can't on one hand say the manual is easier to drive and on the other accuse the consumers of being lazy. There is some logic missing here.
 
Something has made the manual fall from grace as the "standard" transmission over the years. From all reports Asians are moving in the same direction we are with CVTs and other automatic transmissions even in their small cars. we constantly hear in these forums that manuals are better, easier, more efficient and yet they have been rejected by the majority of American consumers.
 
Europe's automotive preferences have had far less impact on the US than has Asia's That tread isn't likely to change nor is the availability of manuals. Some have suggested that sports cars will be the last bastion of the manual and that could well be. But to the American consumer new and improved means easier to use.
 
The question stands, why if there is a clear advantage to manuals in commuter traffic would consumers reject them and pay more for an automatic at the rate of 9 to 1?
#4996 of 5807
Re: commute update [boaz47] by ny540i6
Oct 14, 2008 (9:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Oct 14, 2008 7:53 am)

The question stands, why if there is a clear advantage to manuals in commuter traffic would consumers reject them and pay more for an automatic at the rate of 9 to 1?
 
Probably because the "clear advantage" is not so clear.
 
Is driving a manual easier? Well, no, not if you measure relative activity - no left foot clutch action, no right hand gear changing, no listening for where the engine is revving to, no looking at the tach for any real info. All that extra "work!"
 
The advantage of possibly better economy is not readily apparent. For most people this is something that they heard once, but unless they drive the same route with two cars identical except for transmission, it's an academic issue.
 
I drive a stick, love driving it, and don't plan doing anything else, however, I will tell you that my car's design kinda makes it that coffee bought on the road gets consumed AT the rest stop (you try using the cupholder in an E39 BMW, you'll understand), but then, I'm not a huge car/food person, anyway.
 
For so many driving is a chore, and a car is an appliance - at best, driving is like really, really fast walking - it gets them from here to there, but if you were to suggest doing it if they did not have to, they'd look at you like you had two heads. So yes, for many (most?) easier, or non-involved is definitely a better idea... these are the same folk that love that there is a Lexus that can park for you, and secretly wish for the autopilot (Look Marge, I just get in, select a destination, and go to sleep... it beeps the horn when I get there! What will they think of next?!)
 
I still believe that the fringe will continue to be there. And I plan being one of them.
#4997 of 5807
Re: commute update [boaz47] by circlew
Oct 14, 2008 (9:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: boaz47 (Oct 14, 2008 7:53 am)

In traffic, there is no advantage with a manual other than the proficiency/control that one would have regardless of traffic conditions. IOW, if it doesn't bother you to constantly shift/lift/on/off clutch, knock yourself out. It's all good.
 
OTOH, just leave it in drive or shift the A/T manually for the same effect and it is much easier in stop/go situations.
 
If you consider sheer ease of operation, the A/T wins.
 
If you prefer more control and more work, shift yourself and the M/T wins. However, I submit you have just as much control manually shifting a good A/T as the M/T provides in traffic.
 
Regards,
OW
#4998 of 5807
by tallman1
Oct 14, 2008 (9:47 am)
Reply
we constantly hear in these forums that manuals are better, easier, more efficient and yet they have been rejected by the majority of American consumers.
 
1. Better: Pretty subjective. Depends on what you are looking for. Obviously there are plenty of folks who feel an automatic is "better". I disagree, of course.
 
2. Easier: Some have said they are easier to drive in traffic jams. However, if one doesn't know how to use a manual, they certainly wouldn't be easier. I am also well aware that there are many who feel an automatic is easier in traffic. I accept that I am in a minority.
 
3. More efficient: I know that some argue this as automatics get better but I still feel that manuals are more efficient in the mpg dept.
 
Personally, I don't think it matters why automatics are more popular. I'm very aware that they are. I also know that they will always be that way now simply because more young drivers will never learn how to drive a stick. Mom and dad have an automatic and that's all they learn how to drive. My kids are an exception.
#4999 of 5807
Re: commute update [circlew] by tallman1
Oct 14, 2008 (9:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Oct 14, 2008 9:32 am)

If you consider sheer ease of operation, the A/T wins.
 
That's what I was talking about... I disagree. I find the manual easier in traffic. Again, I'm very aware that many disagree.

Messages Page 500 of 581
1
...
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
...
581
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement