You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Chevrolet Monte Carlo Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2006 and Newer

Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2006 and Newer

103 messages,  Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 6:09 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Monte Carlo Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Monte Carlo

Messages Page 6 of 11 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#50 of 103 My Thoughts by revitupfast Nov 22, 2005 (5:56 pm)
I agree that the Monte Carlo isn't anywhere near the numbers the Impala is in unit sales, but I think the Monte was specifically designed for the NASCAR circuit. I don't think the Impala even comes close as far as the aerodynamics of the body are concerned, and unless GM is prepared to abandon their NASCAR presence, they will continue with the Monte nameplate. Whether the particular vehicle itself sells in great numbers or not isn't the issue. The advertising for the Chevrolet division is the big thing, and it has taken many years to make the claim "The winningest name in Nascar history". It would be hard to throw that away. That being said, I do think Chevy is way to conservative with the styling and they better wake up soon. The buying public (Me and people like me) aren't going to continue to support same old, same old. I have owned a 2000 SS and now a 2004 SS. About the only difference between the two is the 04 has the Supercharged motor. Nice but the car is virtually the same. Same as the 06 V8 power, nice, but what else is new. Sure some minor modifications but nothing I can see that really turns my crank to cough up another $10 - $15 grand to trade up.
#51 of 103 2006 Monte Carlo by charts2 Nov 23, 2005 (7:30 am)
The 2006 Monte Carlo just doesn't cut it. I am not being negative to anyone who owns one but it is a dated style and chevy blew it. NASCAR racing is huge. But win on Sunday sell on Monday doesn't work anymore. For the 10s of millions Chevy pumps into Team Monte Carlo it isn't paying back dividends of higher sales.        With the newer 4 Door Dodge Charger, and next year the new 4 dr Ford Fusion in NASCAR the Monte Carlo will be out of place. Its still based largely on the old 00-05 platform style.        Its time Chevy got exciting again. I was around in the 60s when stylish 2 door Impala SS, Chevelles, Novas, Camaros ruled the streets. High performance/trim packages could be ordered through Chevy. Everyone knew a Chevy model from blocks away,........not today!       Check out the website pictures of this new Dodge Challenger coming it will make the current Monte look like a Model T Ford.       Chevy, you have to take a chance to get a chance.....make some bold moves and become performance/styling leader like you were 40 years ago. Boring Cars/Trucks just don't cut it anymore!
#52 of 103 Most reliable model/engine? by crazygrrrl Dec 31, 2005 (12:39 pm)
I'm thinking about buying a Monte Carlo in 2007 (I never buy the 1st model year that a car is made or revised). I test drove the 2005 version, and found the seats very comfortable, with good outward visibility (rear visibility is not that good, but stick on blindspot mirrors will alleviate that), and it's decently priced.   Does anyone know which of the 3 models or engines are most dependable?   LS/LT: 3.5 V6 LTZ: 3.9 V6 SS: 5.3 V8   The only features I really want are the side airbags, OnStar, XM Radio, and antilock brakes. This car will be replacing my 2003 Civic sedan. It's a great little car with 36 average MPG, but it is so underpowered that it is dangerous to drive in my mostly uphill commute. I'd rather sacrifice fuel economy for more power. Replies to this message: revitupfast (Jan 11, 2006 7:44 pm) crazygrrrl (Jan 12, 2006 5:45 pm) chevygirl (May 07, 2006 3:37 am)
#53 of 103 Re: Most reliable model/engine? [crazygrrrl] by revitupfast Jan 11, 2006 (7:44 pm)
Replying to: crazygrrrl (Dec 31, 2005 12:39 pm) All the engines you list are "New" for 06. The 5.3 V8 has been used in the GM truck line for years, although not with the cylinder deactivation system. I had a 2001 model SS with the 3.8 V6 200hp and now have an 04 with the supercharged 3.8 V6 These engines have been bulletproof, but they should be, considering the length of time they have been in service with GM. I do know the extra 40hp the 04 has is a big step up from the previous 200hp model. Whatever you choose, I think you will notice quite a difference from what you are driving now. Although I'm a bit partial to the power of the V8 (comes from my love of the old muscle cars of the 60's I guess), I would think the 3.9 in the LTZ would be a good overall choice. From what I have seen, I looks to me the LTZ with the 3.9 as the standard engine is a fairly reasonably priced rig when you add up all the features it has. Should be as quick as my 04 Supercharged SS as well since the HP numbers are the same. 36 MPG average is good mileage, you won't get that but overall I would think you should see around 22-25 mpg average. All in all, you will have a three year warranty so let the General take care of any problems. Hey, who knows, my dad just got a new 06 Buick Allure (Lacrosse in the US) and it has a 4 year warranty. Mabey Chev will up their warranty for the 07 models. Good Luck, I'm sure you will like the Monte, I expect to get an 07 myself. That will be 3 in a row for me. Replies to this message: crazygrrrl (Jan 12, 2006 5:45 pm) chevygirl (May 07, 2006 3:37 am)
#54 of 103 Re: Most reliable model/engine? [revitupfast] by crazygrrrl Jan 12, 2006 (5:45 pm)
Replying to: revitupfast (Jan 11, 2006 7:44 pm) Thanks, revitupfast. I was thinking about getting the 3.5 or 3.9. I can't imagine having a V8. That would be overkill for me. Super-fun, but too expensive on gas and insurance (my commute is 250 miles/week!).   I know the power of the 3.8, and boy, can a car fly with that engine. It's what I have in my 2001 Firebird (my weekend car). The average I got with the Firebird was 23-25 mpg. If I drove like a granny, the highest I got was 31 mpg.   I guess I'll just have to wait and see which of the 2 new V6's are most reliable. Thanks again. Replies to this message: chevygirl (May 07, 2006 3:37 am)
#55 of 103 Re: 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo [jpstax1] by savethemontes Jan 14, 2006 (2:23 pm)
Replying to: jpstax1 (Feb 10, 2005 7:39 am) Another FWD? A lot of good points made on other posts. It does come down to preference and where you live. As the New Yorker said, RWD with Blizzaks and a driver who knows how to drive is all it takes. My take on the Monte for the past 10+ years is Chevy has failed horribly by using the name 'Monte Carlo' on the product delivered. The name is associated with a powerful race car that eats the road. Trying to combine luxury and sport didn't work so why have they stayed stale for so long? The Monte should always be a step ahead of the Mustang, if not, don't call it a Monte. They don't take 2nd or 3rd place overall on the track and yet on the road...way behind. They should start by firing the design team for continually delivering a car that seems suited for seniors. The Intimidator was a gleam of hope and also any custom Monte's I've seen show what they should deliver from the factory. The V8 should have always been an option but they also need to stop making the car as big as a boat if they want them to sell. People no longer want or can afford full size cars...get up with the times. Regardless, I still support them but I wonder how much support they've lost with their lack of innovation. Like another post mentioned, the 06 platform should have been released in 04 and by now we should have seen the meanest looking Monte in a decade...the best example I can remember was that concept they had at the '98 auto show...that was a nice Monte...check it...   http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/edweb/news/Detroit/photos- /Taz.jpg
#56 of 103 Monte Carlo SS Signature Series 2006 by legault66 Jan 19, 2006 (1:04 pm)
Does anyone know if Chevrolet is going to produce a 2006 SS Signature Series Edition for the Montre Carlo ??? Just like we had a Tony Stewart one for 2005, a Dale Jr for 2004, etc...   Thanks
#57 of 103 2006 Monte Carlo/ Nascar by charts2 Feb 02, 2006 (11:07 am)
With Toyota declaring they will enter NASCAR racing in 2007 fielding Camrys, 2006 might be the last year that Hendrick Motor Sports fields Monte Carlos. Rick Hendrick owns the largest # of Lexus/Toyota dealerships in the USA and he would be hard pressed to continue with GM. My prediction is that Jeff Gordon, Jimmie Johnson, and other Hendrick teamates will be driving Toyota Camrys in 2007. The Monte Carlo has fallen on hard times the last few years with dwindling sales. What to do?
#58 of 103 2006 Monte Carlo 3LT by jb7227 Mar 29, 2006 (6:09 pm)
Test drove a 3LT today - I was very impressed with how tight & quiet this car was. Very good pickup, and ride was smoother than I thought. Only negative (for me) - I do not like a spoiler on the back. Test car was a fairly loaded cloth-seat model (sticker was around 25.5K) - I found seats to be comfortable, back seat comfortable once you could get in. Trunk space is great. This is a lot of car for the money. I would like to try a 3.5 v-6 for comparison - but I want to make sure the engine is a u.s.-built 3.5 and not one built in Mexico. Any input on 3.5 vs. 3.9 liter engines? Replies to this message: hdmonte (Apr 03, 2006 9:05 am) doctuck (Apr 13, 2006 1:52 pm)
#59 of 103 Re: 2006 Monte Carlo 3LT [jb7227] by hdmonte Apr 03, 2006 (9:05 am)
Replying to: jb7227 (Mar 29, 2006 6:09 pm) I bought a 2006 Monte Carlo 3LT 2 months ago.   So far I have racked up 3,200 miles and already done the first oil change.   I am completely satisfied so far and have no complaints. The car is solid and very smooth. The power of the 3.9L is great. I test drove a 5.3L V8 and was unimpressed. I may have based some of my feeling on the 5.3L SSR experience I had, which was uninspired to say the least. It just didn't seem to have a great deal of grunt.   For me the only positive about the SS Monte I tested vs. the 3.9L I bought was the exhaust note at start up and idle. I also liked the exhaust tips better than the stock 3.9L ones but that has been remedied already with a set of 2.5" dual wall Stainless aftermarket versions.   I think that the '06 Monte is a great choice compared to the armies of Lexi, Camry and Accords that are all to numerous on the roads. Replies to this message: doctuck (Apr 13, 2006 1:52 pm)

Messages Page 6 of 11 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Chevrolet Monte Carlo Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2006 and Newer