Sign In Join 



Hyundai Accent

598 messages,  Last post on Sep 30, 2009 at 4:15 AM

You are in the Hyundai Accent Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Hyundai Accent, Coupe, Hatchback


Messages Page 57 of 60
1
...
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#559 of 598
2007 features, availability by sonatabean
Dec 02, 2006 (2:00 pm)
Reply
I just visited a local dealer to check out the Accent and Elantra - I actually drove to the very rear of the dealership so I could scope out the cars undisturbed.
 
Naturally, the typical glad-handling, grinning salesman hunted me down and tried to sell me a car.
 
I think he lied to me, too: I understand the Accent is just plain not available with cruise.
 
The smarmy salesman insisted the Accent WAS available with cruise.
 
I dug in my heels a bit and, towards the end of the exchange, with a bit of exasperation, the salesman suggested that "... adding cruise to a 2007 Accent is not difficult."
 
So - did Hyundai finally add cruise for the US market?
 
If not, can one add cruise to an Accent via aftermarket addition?
 
If one does add cruise, will it void any Hyundai warranties?
 
 
#560 of 598
Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS by germancarfan1
Dec 19, 2006 (6:46 am)
Reply
Well, if you needed another reason not to buy the Accent, here it is: Awful IIHS scores. It's pretty much a death trap.
 
Side impact: POOR
Rear impact: POOR
Front impact: Acceptable
 
The Accent is the only small car tested, aside from the Aveo, that didn't receive a good frontal test. In addition, both the Yaris and Fit received good side impact scores (and good frontal impact). These scores pretty much solidify what many have suspected all along, exploding airbags won't make up from a poorly constructed body.
 
Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries plus a fracture of the pelvis would be likely in a crash of this severity. In addition, loading to the shoulder was excessive.
Yikes!
#561 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [germancarfan1] by backy
Dec 19, 2006 (7:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (May 30, 2006 1:56 am)

Yes, those are poor scores and takes the Accent off my "consider" list, which is unfortunate because I like the car otherwise. Pretty amazing Hyundai would let the design go forward knowing these would be the crash test results.
 
If Hyundai doesn't address this issue aggressively, it will definitely hurt sales since there are other small cars out there available with standard SABs that did much better in the IIHS tests. The fact that the IIHS released the results tells me Hyundai doesn't plan to do anything in the near future, otherwise it's typical for the IIHS to hold up publishing the results before the manufacturer has made some modifications and requested a re-test.
#562 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [backy] by germancarfan1
Dec 19, 2006 (7:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 7:33 am)

Well stated.
 
The fact is, Hyundai would rather save money and equipp its cars with air bags aplenty, then actually spend the R&D and manufacuring costs to produce a safe structered car. Hyundai does have a ways to go.
#563 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [germancarfan1] by backy
Dec 19, 2006 (7:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (Dec 19, 2006 7:39 am)

The puzzling thing is, since Hyundai has done pretty well in crash safety on their other "24x7" designs, particularly with the Entourage, it's really strange they didn't emphasize crash safety more with the Accent.
#564 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [backy] by germancarfan1
Dec 19, 2006 (7:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 7:46 am)

Costs had to be cut somewhere and safety was the one to go on the Accent. But this should be no surprise to anyone that has test driven or even opened the doors on an Accent. They always felt thin and flimsy to me, far more so than the Fit or Rabbit, and even far more so than other Hyundai models (Sonata has nice solid doors).
 
If I was Hyundai, I'd drop the Accent line completely. They don't sell well and all the model does is hurt the reputation of the other models that are decent.
#565 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [germancarfan1] by backy
Dec 19, 2006 (8:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (Dec 19, 2006 7:50 am)

Like other automakers, Hyundai needs an entry-level model to draw new buyers into the brand. And believe it or not, many of these buyers don't put crash safety anywhere near the top of their requirements list. I've seen that opinion stated many times in Town Hall.
 
Also, we don't know yet how Hyundai will respond to these results, or whether it's possible to improve them without major changes to the car.
#566 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [germancarfan1] by sonatabean
Dec 19, 2006 (2:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: germancarfan1 (May 30, 2006 1:56 am)

I see VW America's strident little web intern is back: I bothered to check out the IIHP results.
 
Here they are. Not far off what German Car Employee reports . . . but not exactly fully truthful (as usual), either.
 
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=586
 
#560 of 565 Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS by germancarfan1
 
Dec 19, 2006 (6:46 am)
  
Well, if you needed another reason not to buy the Accent, here it is: Awful IIHS scores. It's pretty much a death trap.
  
Side impact: POOR
Rear impact: POOR
Front impact: Acceptable
#567 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [sonatabean] by sonatabean
Dec 19, 2006 (2:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sonatabean (Dec 19, 2006 2:13 pm)

In the interest of full disclosure, here's the full set of test results.
 
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=715
#568 of 598
Re: Another nail in the Accent coffin: IIHS [sonatabean] by backy
Dec 19, 2006 (2:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sonatabean (Dec 19, 2006 2:13 pm)

Actually, germancarfan1's post re the Accent's scores was accurate. They were Acceptable overall on frontal impact, Poor overall on side impact, and Poor on rear impact.
 
"Death trap" is hyperbole of course, but worst-in-class on crash tests is not a good thing--especially for a car company that touts the safety of its cars at every opportunity.

Messages Page 57 of 60
1
...
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement