Sign In Join 



Diesels in the News

8143 messages,  Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 12:10 PM

You are in the Diesels Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Diesel


Messages Page 771 of 815
1
...
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
...
815
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#7698 of 8143
This would be a welcome choice by gagrice
Jun 12, 2009 (5:54 am)
Reply
If Land Rover brings their Defender line to the USA they would move to the top of my list. As far as I can tell the 2010 newly designed Defender's only come with a 2.4 L diesel engine. I like the looks. They are about $20k less than a comparable Toyota Land Cruiser. That is only offered with diesel engines in the UK. Now that a progressive company owns Land Rover maybe will see some good choices. I look for Tata to end up with the whole Chrysler dealer network.
 
#7699 of 8143
Re: This would be a welcome choice [gagrice] by alltorque
Jun 12, 2009 (12:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jun 12, 2009 5:54 am)

Yes, you're right - 2.4 diesel only now. Gone are the days of a proper "Landy" with a V8 gasser. These are still proper "Landy's" but for a purpose - climbing mountains, pulling main battle tanks out of the mud; that sort of thing.
 
Still very cool for what is basically a 60 year old body design. Still very much respected in their homeland and lots of old ones still roaming about. Used to be that they could be fixed by anyone with a screwdriver, hammer and a set of spanners. Fender bender ? Unbolt the offending panel, attack it with a soft mallet, (or even a lump of 4" x 2"), and bolt it back on. Sorted. I imagine the body construction hasn't changed and is still the same aluminium it always was, (long before everyone else "invented" alum for car bodies).
#7700 of 8143
Audi, pardner by larsb
Jun 12, 2009 (12:20 pm)
Reply
.
Some good, some bad
#7701 of 8143
Re: This would be a welcome choice [alltorque] by ruking1
Jun 12, 2009 (12:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: alltorque (Jun 12, 2009 12:11 pm)

I'd be totally ok with a 30 year old vehicle with a proper "new diesel". Nothing wrong with 30-35 mpg !!!!
 
We just put a 15 year old TLC (gasser) through a major maintenance ! 170,000 miles. For sure it "should have" this and that... BUT... all systems A OK. The last MANDATORY but alledgedly randomly drawn "SMOG ONLY" tested essentially NEW. They tore into the valve cover to check the valve adjustment, still factory specifications (a valve adjust would net them a couple hundred dollars more) Perhaps at the 30 year mark we will be looking at 340,000 miles. .
 
So despite what most all claim, vehicles can be built to last 30 years....
#7702 of 8143
Re: This would be a welcome choice [ruking1] by larsb
Jun 12, 2009 (1:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Jun 12, 2009 12:29 pm)

VERY few "daily driver" cars make it to 30 years. And those that do suffer multiple thousands of dollars in repair work along that way.
#7703 of 8143
Re: This would be a welcome choice [larsb] by ruking1
Jun 12, 2009 (2:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jun 12, 2009 1:12 pm)

Well that is the flip side to what I am saying.
 
And of course you aren't saying that you never have to replace rotors, brake pads, tires, etc?
#7704 of 8143
Some DIS advantages by ruking1
Jun 13, 2009 (4:59 am)
Reply
Fender-benders in microcars can be costly
By Ken Thomas
 
link title
#7705 of 8143
Diesel Audi Q7 TDI by avalon02wh
Jun 13, 2009 (5:40 am)
Reply
I see James Healey did a piece on the Diesel Audi Q7 TDI
 
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2009-06-11-test-drive-audi-q7- -tdi_N.htm
 
He recorded "15.7 mpg (6.37 gallons per 100 miles) in easy-going suburban driving." The vehicle is rated 17/25 mpg. It sounds like the Q7 will struggle to make its EPA ratings.
#7706 of 8143
Re: Diesel Audi Q7 TDI [avalon02wh] by ruking1
Jun 13, 2009 (5:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: avalon02wh (Jun 13, 2009 5:40 am)

..."Diesels can get 25% to 40% better mileage than similar-size gas engines."...
 
The Toyota Prius had issues meeting its EPA ratings. At the time I was considering the 04 Prius, the EPA was 50 highway 60 city. Again at the time Edmunds.com Prius mpg threads were indicating 45 MAX (more like 43 in the city. minus - 28% from the stated city EPA ) from a lot of very dissapointed folks. In all fairness I did not and still do not count myself amoung that population.
 
It was all the more interesting, since Toyota did the submissions. Needless to say it (those self submissions) became not only politically embarrasing, but the EPA took the unusual action to re"cook" the tests so the Toyota Prius could get closer to the "cooked" ratings they didn't and should not have cooked. Incidently they still have issues meeting their OWN published numbers.....
 
Makes you wonder with the above quote how much better a diesel powered (anything) Prius hybrid will do.
#7707 of 8143
Re: This would be a welcome choice [larsb] by ruking1
Jun 13, 2009 (7:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jun 12, 2009 1:12 pm)

..."And those that do suffer multiple thousands of dollars in repair work along that way. "....
 
I think also the above "sweeping" generalization might hide the fact that most is generated on the newly place unneeded and unreliable (usually electronic...) stuff.

Messages Page 771 of 815
1
...
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
...
815
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement