Sign In Join 



Diesels in the News

8129 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 4:53 PM

You are in the Diesels Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Diesel


Messages Page 735 of 814
1
...
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
...
814
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#7337 of 8129
Re: Will CARB & EPA bankrupt the trucking industry? [houdini1] by easym1
Jan 02, 2009 (8:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Jan 02, 2009 7:54 pm)

Both Canada and USA are rich in CNG but both countrie's car manufacturers don't seemed to notice this great potential.
#7338 of 8129
... CARB, EPA, Pilot, TA: it's 2009 by roland3
Jan 07, 2009 (10:02 am)
Reply
... I've made a prediction on Edmunds that urea systems will be obsolete before the last truckstop in California has the pumps and tanks installed. So: we have the relatively new Argonne Labs patent for NOx reduction, and today we have breaking news that Eaton Corp. and Clean Diesel Technologies are collaborating on a system that will improve Eaton's system that does not require on-board tanks or a couple hundred million of infrastructure. Geeshe, what a novel idea: USA technology for a USA and Earth problem.
..
... I am sure the bean counters in Pilot and TA told the execs that they are the smartest guys in the room, because it's as simple as this: look at Europe: X amount of regs, equals X amount of fuel, equals X amount of urea, BUT did they tell you this technology might be ten years old by the time you have it implemented. Maybe that is the problem, the bean counters and the reg makers are building engines. It might actually be a fortuitous time for Flying J to be in Chapter 11 as they should come out the other side of this and not have truckers haul away their probably hazardous ammonia tanks. Arnold, why not save the State and the trucking industry, a few hundred million and stop this nightmare before the first one goes in the ground ??? But wait, don't forget Homeland Security on this deal !!!
#7339 of 8129
CARB & EPA Cool Aid by yesdiesel1
Jan 09, 2009 (10:18 am)
Reply
Well we know that eight years of an oil administration that could do nothing right what are we up against with the coming Clinton 2.0' or Obama for those that have not noticed.
 
#7340 of 8129
Re: ... CARB, EPA, Pilot, TA: it's 2009 [roland3] by roland3
Jan 10, 2009 (8:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: roland3 (Jan 07, 2009 10:02 am)

... There is also one or more particulate filters that also reduce NOx; although not enough to meet the latest CARB regs, as a stand alone system.
#7341 of 8129
Re: ... CARB, EPA, Pilot, TA: it's 2009 [roland3] by roland3
Jan 11, 2009 (2:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: roland3 (Jan 10, 2009 8:27 am)

... The 2009 Dodge with 6.7 Cummins MEETS 2010 CARB regs with NO urea. It has a particulate filter with catalyst. Go ahead, TA and Pilot, make my day. Ironically, Cummins is setting up a large urea distribution network, for other models and manufacturers.
#7342 of 8129
Re: ... CARB, EPA, Pilot, TA: it's 2009 [roland3] by alltorque
Jan 11, 2009 (2:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: roland3 (Jan 11, 2009 2:06 pm)

It has a particulate filter with catalyst.
 
Quite a number of the diesel cars here in Europe use Disel Particulate Filters, (DPF). They appear to be potentially troublesome if car only wanders around town and the exhaust doesn't get really hot, (enough to burn off the nasties). Dashboard message comes up so you need to go do a circa 20 minute run at 50mph to get it all hot and clean. Miss that opportunity and it's down to min power and a trip to the dealer for cat cleaning. Get caught with this 3 times and you may well need a new cat............and that's not a warranty item in those circumstances, apparently. Anyway, that's my simplistic take on the topic. The link is better, (it's from a leasing company). Let me make it clear that I don't know anyone who has had this problem, (and most of my friends drive modern diesels), but it does appear on various Forums from time to time - and gets a lot of attention; as "bad" things always do. Enjoy.
 
DPF
#7343 of 8129
Re: ... CARB, EPA, Pilot, TA: it's 2009 [alltorque] by roland3
Jan 11, 2009 (6:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: alltorque (Jan 11, 2009 2:46 pm)

... Allt, technically it's a catalyst absorber. I've posted on here that I think the exchange program for the particulate filters might be better. They are cleaned in a facility that is designed for such work. It would be great if they only needed cleaning once a year. What is the urea infrastructure over there ?
#7344 of 8129
If they can fly a jet plane with it, why not a diesel by winter2
Jan 13, 2009 (3:37 pm)
Reply
Continental Airlines tested a Boeing 737-800 using biofuel on one engine and normal jet fuel on the other. Worked great.
 
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/continental/6199665.html
#7345 of 8129
Re: If they can fly a jet plane with it, why not a diesel [winter2] by gagrice
Jan 13, 2009 (4:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: winter2 (Jan 13, 2009 3:37 pm)

Algae biodiesel has been touted here on this thread for several years. Notice the Feds did not participate. I think the whole alternative fuel thing will work better without the government getting involved. They always seem to mess up everything the touch. Corn ethanol and MTBE both come to mind.
 
The biofuel blend included components derived from algae and jatropha plants. Both are sustainable, second-generation sources that don’t have an effect on food crops or water resources, according to Continental.
 
The algae oil was provided by Sapphire Energy, and the jatropha oil was provided by Terasol Energy. Other partners with Continental on the project were Boeing, CFM International, a joint company of General Electric and Snecma, and refining technology developer UOP, a Honeywell company.
 
Sustainable biofuels for aviation are a real near-term option, Jennifer Holmgren, general manager of UOP Renewable Energy and Chemicals, said Wednesday.
 
“We believe production levels could reach hundreds of millions of gallons per year by 2012,” Holmgren said.

 
It looks like at least 15 other companies are doing R&D on algae biodiesel
 
http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/27/15-algae-startups-bringing-pond-scum-to-fuel-ta- nks/
#7346 of 8129
Re: If they can fly a jet plane with it, why not a diesel [gagrice] by gagrice
Jan 13, 2009 (4:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 13, 2009 4:43 pm)

Looking deeper into Sapphire Energy it looks like a familiar name is a prime investor. Bill Gates dumped his stock in Corn Ethanol and went into Biodiesel. I could have told him to do that several years ago. Rockefeller money is also involved.
 
For Mr. Gates, the investment in Sapphire marks a shift in his clean-fuel strategy and perhaps a sign of a broader interest in alternative energy. An early investor in Pacific Ethanol Inc., Cascade sold its stake earlier this year, according to market data from Thomson Financial.
 
Could another well-known ethanol investor be far behind? Vinod Khosla, a Silicon Valley billionaire whose personal investment vehicle has backed numerous ethanol-related companies, is scheduled to give the keynote address next month at the Algae Biomass Summit. This has led to speculation that he might be looking at algae for investment opportunities.

 
http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/09/17/bill-gates-goes-for-algae-i- nvests-in-biofuel-maker-sapphire-energy/

Messages Page 735 of 814
1
...
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
...
814
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement