Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups Diesels Diesels in the News
8143 messages, Last post on Nov 27, 2009 at 12:10 PM
You are in the Diesels Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 25, 2008 2:18 pm) Toyota ought to just get them one or two heavy duty diesel Tundras and leave the gasser trucks to other folks.
|
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 25, 2008 2:05 pm) Indeed for example, the closer comparos would be Jettas TDI/gasser . Civic gasser/hybrid/TDI. Prius' gasser/hybrid. . Toyota has wisely stayed away from Prius' direct gasser/hybrid comparo's as the premium is really not worth the so called "advantages". So for example between a Toyota Corolla TDI/gasser- a no brainer is the TDI! Civic gasser/hybrid comparos, history says the Civic Hybrid BOMBED !!! This is despite the fact it is a very good hybrid! and car. Lots of reasons, but the major one is Civic had a gasser to compare it against. Prius as I have indicated did/does NOT. Given your 30,000 to 50,000 miles per year would you rather get 38 mpg or 56 mpg with a (1,000) premium ? The BE is easily less than the first year (given your mileage) It is 1,316 gals vs 893 gals= 423 gals x 4=$1,692. The 03 Jetta TDI premium over the 1.8T was $246. as I remembered. The fuel mileage was 50 mpg vs 30 mpg. Over 25,000 miles for 4 years consumption was 1000 gals vs 3333 gals. I would guess in your cost effectiveness thinking, burning 3333 gals when 2,000 gals will do; makes economic sense. To boot the 1.8T requires premium. 
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Sep 25, 2008 2:27 pm) It's comparing the "highest mileage diesel 5-passenger sedan" to the "highest mileage hybrid 5-passenger sedan" and in that regard, it is right on the money to compare them.
|
|
|
Replying to: larsb (Sep 25, 2008 2:46 pm) As an aside, the Honda Civic gasser gets 38-42 mpg and holds 4/5 folks. I'd be ungrateful if I didn't say I was happy with it. But I got to tell you, I would be tickled pink with a Honda Civic TDI with 52-56 mpg! |
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Sep 25, 2008 2:27 pm) In the comparo between the Civic gasser and the Civic hybrid - with similar equipment - the hybrid wins easily... but that's a subject for a different forum. Now looking at the Jetta TDI vs Civic gasser vs Corolla gasser, sedans all? That huge differential in the price of the diesel vehicle and the higher price of the fuel requires a lot of driving annually. I probably do drive that much so the TDI may be more cost effective. Let's see. Using 'reported' results rather than the more conservative EPA values 2009 Corolla 39 Hwy 2008 Civic 38 Hwy 2009 Jetta TDI 43 Hwy ( 40 Edmunds / 45 PopMech ) Fuel usage/Cost based on 36000 miles annually 2009 Corolla..925 gal RUG  3.40......$3145 2008 Civic.....950 gal RUG 3.40......$3230 2009 TDI.......835 gal DF 3.90.........$3250 These all seem about equal since it's 36000 mi/yr. It's a nominal difference. The only difference then would be in the prices of the underlying vehicles and the relative resale values. However these are three of the best vehicles for holding value. Again it looks like a tossup based solely on preference not money. |
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 25, 2008 3:52 pm) One one level I do agree with this take, but on the other hand it is hard to realize your preference/s when the preference/s is/are hardly available. Again I cite 3% diesel passenger vehicle fleet. The majority of those diesels are on platforms that I do not have a current use for. Another is why do I really want to get a MB 320 TDI when what I really NEED a Civic TDI for everyday commuting? Or why do you want to commute in a FORD F250 when a Ford Fiesta does just fine solely because both are gassers? You would think it so preposterous if it were a a choice between a gasser MB 320 and a Civic !  And thanks for further illustrating my point about the so called "Prius" gasser only equivalents. Toyota really downplays the reality in this. So yes, my Prius alternative is the Civic. While it is true I do not routinely get 45 mpg in the Civic (as the Prius) , it does get 38-42 and costs app 13,000 LESS.
|
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 25, 2008 3:52 pm) 2009 Corolla, 2745# + 300# test weight = 3045# likewise, 2008 Civic, 2630+300=2930# 2009 TDI, 3230+300=3530# 2009 Prius 2932+300 = 3232# 2009 Corolla, TFC/IW = 1/(39*3045)= 0.842e-5 gal/mi/pound 2008 Civic, TFC/IW = 1/(38*2930)= 0.898e-5 gal/mi/pound 2009 TDI, TFC/IW = 1/(43*3530)= 0.659e-5 gal/mi/pound 2009 Prius TFC/IW = 1/(44*3232)= 0.703e-5 gal/mi/pound Smaller number is better. TDI and Prius are really the same efficiency since there is 10% more energy in diesel fuel. Factor that out, they're the same. The gassers need 20-28% (call it 25%) more fuel energy to do the same amount of work as the diesel and the hybrid. Inefficient. Hey, I have a furnace with 92% heat-to-energy efficiency, and compact flourescent bulbs that are four times as efficient at converting energy to light as incandescent, why should I not also be concerned with the work-to-energy efficiency of my vehicle? 25% is a big difference. Civic and Corolla are out of consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: 104wb (Sep 25, 2008 5:45 pm) Looks like the hot ticket is to drive a fully-loaded class 8 truck (80,000 lbs) that gets 7 mpg. That'd be roughly 3.7 times better than the TDI. Next stop -- freight trains.
|
|
|
Replying to: ruking1 (Sep 25, 2008 3:59 pm) At that time I looked only at the hatchbacks. Under similar circumstances today only the Prius and the SportWagon would be under consideration. However being basically cheap in regards to transportation if I was in the market today I'd look first to find a good USED hatchback like a $14000 - $15000 Prius for the best combo of utility and fuel economy. |
|
|
Replying to: cdnpinhead (Sep 26, 2008 4:49 am)  
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
