Sign In Join 



Diesels in the News

8147 messages,  Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 8:22 PM

You are in the Diesels Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Diesel


Messages Page 692 of 815
1
...
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
...
815
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6908 of 8147
Re: Nissan introduces first domestic diesel to Japan in years [yesdiesel1] by altair4
Sep 24, 2008 (2:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: yesdiesel1 (Sep 23, 2008 2:31 pm)

It's not just California. A bunch of NE states, from PA northeastward, have also adopted the CARB standards. I'd guess, and it's strictly just a guess, that the other CARB states are a sizeable percentage of the CA market. That's a large part of the North American market following a much stricter emissions standard than the rest of the country.
#6909 of 8147
Re: Nissan introduces first domestic diesel to Japan in years [altair4] by larsb
Sep 24, 2008 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: altair4 (Sep 24, 2008 2:58 am)

I think it's just the states who have serious air pollution problems that are CARB states.
 
  I say good for them. I wish all 50 states adopted CARB standards. It would make for cleaner air for everyone instead of just the lucky few.
#6910 of 8147
CARB STANDARDS SPREAD by hypnosis44
Sep 24, 2008 (8:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: altair4 (Sep 24, 2008 2:58 am)

Yes, and I believe it is a good trend and one that will spread. At least one Canadian province has also adopted CARB standards.
#6911 of 8147
Re: Nissan introduces first domestic diesel to Japan in years [altair4] by 104wb
Sep 24, 2008 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: altair4 (Sep 24, 2008 2:58 am)

You're right. I figured it out recently; 'CARB' states account for about 1/3 of the US population. Because of this large fraction, automakers won't introduce new technology in the US unless it meets CARB standards.
 
Tier2Bin5 'better' than EuroVI? No, just different. Bin5 is more stringent on NOx, less stringent on PM. The differences are enough to keep most of the clean diesels out of the US. See graph in post 6717. I grew up in the Appalachians in the 70s when cars were operating in the biggest box in that graph, and NOx / acid rain was destroying lakes and trees where I lived. The differences between bin5 and EuroVI are insignificant compared to what we had back then. The US should adopt Euro emissions at the same time Europe does so we can benefit from the 40% reduced fuel consumption that diesels offer.
#6912 of 8147
Re: CARB STANDARDS SPREAD [hypnosis44] by altair4
Sep 24, 2008 (9:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: hypnosis44 (Sep 24, 2008 8:31 am)

Don't know about the Canadian province, but I think the following states are following CARB:
 
Connecticut, D.C., Delaware, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas.
#6913 of 8147
Re: CARB STANDARDS SPREAD [altair4] by ruking1
Sep 24, 2008 (9:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: altair4 (Sep 24, 2008 9:25 am)

You might have inadvertently left out the CARB leader of which four more states followed: Kali for knee ah. Many states are "me too-aka wanna be's", hence the new/old designation "50 state"
 
Suffice to say the rules and regulations keep the the passenger diesel population low.
#6914 of 8147
Re: Nissan introduces first domestic diesel to Japan in years [104wb] by kdhspyder
Sep 24, 2008 (11:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: 104wb (Sep 24, 2008 9:23 am)

You're right. I figured it out recently; 'CARB' states account for about 1/3 of the US population. Because of this large fraction, automakers won't introduce new technology in the US unless it meets CARB standards.
  
Tier2Bin5 'better' than EuroVI? No, just different. Bin5 is more stringent on NOx, less stringent on PM. The differences are enough to keep most of the clean diesels out of the US. See graph in post 6717. I grew up in the Appalachians in the 70s when cars were operating in the biggest box in that graph, and NOx / acid rain was destroying lakes and trees where I lived. The differences between bin5 and EuroVI are insignificant compared to what we had back then. The US should adopt Euro emissions at the same time Europe does so we can benefit from the 40% reduced fuel consumption that diesels offer.

 
Good accurate data here.
 
However from a business model perspective it doesn't make much sense to invest in new clean diesel technology at this time today.
40% is about the maximum fuel economy benefit that can be expected by driving a diesel over a gasser. However...
..there is a 5-15% premium in the cost of production and sales price of the vehicle;
..there is a 5-15% loss of efficiency due to the emissions controls as you noted;
..there is a 10-20% premium to pay for the fuel.
 
In the best case scenario that 40% fuel economy benefit is reduced to 20% but in the worst case there is a 10% penalty for buying, driving, fueling a diesel over a gasser. It appears to be at best breakeven at this time. Improving the existing gasser technology seems the less expensive/less risky route for the automakers in NA.
#6915 of 8147
Re: Nissan introduces first domestic diesel to Japan in years [kdhspyder] by ruking1
Sep 24, 2008 (11:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Sep 24, 2008 11:48 am)

Actually it is FAR worse for hybrid cars vs gassers such as Pruis/Civic hybrid vs Corolla/Civic gassers.The 04 Civic hybrid was 20,000 and the Civic gasser was 12,500. I am at 71,000 miles with 38-42 mpg range. 7,500 in premiums for a plain jane daily ordinary 54 mile R/T commute might be a TAD much.
 
So why are we even making noise about less fuel consumption and less foreign oil dependency when most folks subscribe to the attitude you have outlined?
 
I'd be the first to day that 38-42 mpg on a Honda Civic gasser is probably better than 80-98% of the vehicle fleet . But at the same time 48-52 mpg on a TDI ain't bad for a "fuel guzzler"
 
You will probably agree: the key is we are not REALLY serious about less fuel consumption and less foreign oil dependency!
#6916 of 8147
Re: Nissan introduces first domestic diesel to Japan in years [ruking1] by kdhspyder
Sep 24, 2008 (12:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ruking1 (Sep 24, 2008 11:57 am)

Again I was only presenting the business case from a vehicle maker's pov meaning the R&D, investments, marketing, production etc needed to promote diesels here make them a bad risk for LPVs. The vehicle makers are in business to make a profit from what will sell in a given market.
 
Now that you brought up hybrids that IS a route that vehicle makers can take in NA to both save fuel, reduce dependency on foreign oil and make a profit. The new Honda Insight $18000-$19000 will be a smashing success in this regard IMO. The Gen 3 Prius will gain 50% more sales annually than the Gen 2. The midsized auto segment is about to explode with offerings from GM, Ford and Hyundai along with the Toyotas and Nissans now being offered
 
Profits can be made here...and fuel saved.
#6917 of 8147
Composition of Retail prices of Gas vs Diesel by kdhspyder
Sep 24, 2008 (12:43 pm)
Reply
An interesting pair of charts I stumbled across at EIA.DOE.gov.. Maybe it's well-known to some but it was new to me.
 
What goes into the price of Gasoline vs the price of Diesel
 
.............................Gas............. Diesel
Taxes.................... 11% ............ 11%
Dist & Marketing.... 10% ............ 14%
Refining................... 6% ............ 11%
Crude Oil............... 73% ............ 64%

Messages Page 692 of 815
1
...
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
...
815
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement