Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups Diesels Diesels in the News
8146 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 10:20 AM
You are in the Diesels Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: peachtree103 (Jun 29, 2008 7:14 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jkinzel (Jun 29, 2008 8:07 pm) I think it is safe to assume all "final" decisions about upcoming product offerings are suspect. All the domestics and even Toyota are scrambling to change their mix. When Bob Lutz is talking about putting a turbo 4 in Buicks and the Camaro, (where a diesel would work so much better) hell has probably already frozen over.
|
|
|
Replying to: winter2 (Jun 29, 2008 10:58 am) The full size trucks will never get 30mpg US but they can see a big bump in Milege with diesel use. Though till now fuel consumption hasn't been a big deal so consumers bought the cheaper gas version over the diesel version in the lighter duty trucks. What it really comes down to is US consumers buying diesel cars other wise they won't build them. VW is a poor diesel example as VW has a reputation and no matter what sort of car they offer only a certain percentage of shoppers will consider them. I've owned VW's and own a recent one now "it went to the shop today" again.. I won't own another VW the rest of my life. |
|
|
Replying to: watkinst (Jun 30, 2008 2:37 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: watkinst (Jun 30, 2008 2:37 pm) Indeed that is fully 50% better!!! If we were able to CUT 50% of the demand, we'd be down to less than 10% IMPORTED oil. |
|
|
Replying to: watkinst (Jun 30, 2008 2:37 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: winter2 (Jun 30, 2008 3:00 pm)  4800#) given forward esculating fuel cost situations, might be revisited. When you combine that with good diesel engines and killer transmissions, I think the mpg will improve. The alternative is "DIE." I think the Liberty/Cherokee CRD ( 30-31 mpg) might be the standard bearer going forward!!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: peachtree103 (Jun 30, 2008 11:08 am) ============================================================ I think he would rather sell them as turbo charged gas vehicles than have to use them as diesel engined boat anchors. |
|
|
Replying to: hypnosis44 (Jun 30, 2008 7:03 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: hypnosis44 (Jun 30, 2008 7:03 pm) But people like their V-8 engines for torque, and a 6 cyl diesel would replicate what Buick and Camaro drivers are looking for a lot more closely than a turbo 4, with the same or better resulting fuel economy. |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
