- #78 of 102
-
Re: While I was getting my oil changed [kozmo]
by sassy1866
-
Nov 14, 2005 (7:56 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: kozmo (Nov 09, 2005 3:01 pm)
I can agree with everyone here that the RSX is nicer and the quality is better. But I think what is also getting lost in these discussions is that fact that the RSX-S does require premium gas. BIG turn off for me. Sure you can run lesser quality gas in it, but you pay the price in terms of gas mileage and how the car runs. I tested both cars and though I did like the RSX-S, I have to go with gas costing in this case. Plus I can turbo charge the TC, get 200 hp and still save a couple thousand. I talked to the sales guy and he said resale is unbelievable with these cars as he just sold a used tc with 10k miles for the price of new. Also, the big selling feature is that you can mod the car to your own taste. With the Acura you are pretty stuck with buying what they offer you. The TC I can mod it to my own liking, which is a huge feature as well. Why feel like your driving what everyone else has?
|
- #79 of 102
-
"what everyone else has"
by rsx_va
-
Nov 14, 2005 (11:12 am)
-
|
If I were driving a Civic, then I'd feel like I was driving what everyone else has. I really don't see a lot of RSX's on the road. Besides, the TC looks like almost every new Lexus model. Not a bad thing, but kind of takes away from its uniqueness. I like the TC, but with the way it's selling, the used market is likely to be flooded with them in a few years. True that used TC's are going for the price of new right now, but that's partly because it's a brand new model in its first year. The RSX is four years old.
If resale value is important to you, then to me that pretty much cancels out the benefits of a car that's easily modded. Modded cars are worth less than stock IMO.
|
- #80 of 102
-
Re: tC Turbo
by JBaumgart
-
Nov 14, 2005 (1:15 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: sassy1866 (Nov 14, 2005 7:56 am)
I read too that if you add the turbo then it would require premium gas - something to keep in mind if that's what you would do if you bought the tC.
|
- #81 of 102
-
Re: While I was getting my oil changed [sassy1866]
by tonylexus
-
Nov 16, 2005 (8:20 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: sassy1866 (Nov 14, 2005 7:56 am)
I agree with your comments. The fairest comparison is the base RSX vs tC. On that basis, I think the tC is the far better value. Personal preferences may sway one way or the other, but there are no significant differences that warrent the price difference between the base models. The RSX-S version is far more expensive and would only be a fair head-to-head comparo if there were an "S" version of the tC.
|
- #82 of 102
-
RSX-S $$$
by jmichel
-
Nov 16, 2005 (8:27 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: nippononly (Oct 13, 2005 10:29 am)
I test drove both the RSX and the Scion TC. Lowest price on the RSX was 19,700. Lowest price on the TC was 17,500. I thought both cars handle very well and the power is about the same. Slightly better gas mileage with the RSX. Inside the car is where the TC shines. Lot more comfortable and it comes standard with an arm rest, not to mention rear reclining seats, more room and a sky roof. Ended up paying 18,100 for the Scion TC. Added a few options, had to have the IPOD radio and some other goodies. Still saved 1600 over the RSX and the car is running great. As far as the RSX-S. Bring your check book and your credit card, lowest price I found was $24,200. Just not worth it for me.
|
- #83 of 102
-
Re: Acura RSX vs. Scion tC [akl88]
by cr_hilton
-
Nov 23, 2005 (1:54 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: akl88 (Jan 31, 2005 5:11 pm)
i bought a 05 rsx type s four months ago and i love it. when i went shopping for a new car i never even considered a Tc. it ain't me. rsx looks great and its way faster than a Tc. my cousin has a Tc and the seats seem like they're for fat ass kids. it looks like a corrola. yeah i paid more money but i got what i paid for. they ain't even in the same class. if you wanna compare a Tc compare it to a cavalier or civic or something like that. but hey thats just me
|
- #84 of 102
-
tC Handling
by johndunberry
-
Dec 03, 2005 (4:48 pm)
-
|
I'm trying to decide between these two cars. I like the stereo and price better on the tC, but the fact that the RSX has such sharper handling and feels sportier makes me lean toward getting it.
I was wondering whether or not the performance options on the tC help bridge the handling gap between these two cars. Specifically, the TRD shocks/struts kit, the TRD lowering springs kit, and the TRD front strut tie bar are what I'm interested in. How does each of those affect the car? Also, what does the TRD sport muffler do for the car? Does the exhaust sound better or is it too much? Thanks for any help!
|
- #85 of 102
-
Re: tC Handling [johndunberry]
by carlisimo
-
Dec 12, 2005 (2:36 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: johndunberry (Dec 03, 2005 4:48 pm)
I've heard of snap oversteer on the tC. If you drive "vigorously" and find yourself tapping the brakes to correct yourself, get an RSX. You'd end up getting a new stereo eventually though, so figure that in the cost (and its insurance, too).
The TRD springs/shocks and a rear anti-roll bar would go a long way (front strut bars are only barely noticeable in most cars). The exhaust... go for it if you think the tC's too quiet (neither car is loud). I haven't tried a tC with any of those mods though. The price can add up to the level of the RSX, at which point I'd expect handling to be pretty even.
The tC's automatic is a little better than the RSX's; the RSX's manual is better than the tC's.
The RSX's steering feels a lot more fun. It's a little stiff at initial turn-in for some people though. And the engine is less torquey low in the rev range, but a lot sweeter if you frequently go above 5k rpm. The view forward is a lot better in the RSX, but when it comes to looking to the side or back, the tC's a lot easier. Passengers will probably prefer the tC even if the RSX's interior materials are a lot nicer.
I dunno... try them out.
|
- #86 of 102
-
The RSX gets STOLEN often!
by ziggyrn
-
Dec 13, 2005 (1:53 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: carlisimo (Dec 12, 2005 2:36 pm)
I don't know if you are aware that the Acura RSX is one of the most commonly stolen cars. Search it on the net and you will see. My Dad owned an Acura Integra (the RSX before it was renamed) and it was stolen out of his condo parking lot. It even had the alarm set.
He now is the proud owner of a 2006 Scion tc and he absolutely loves it! It handles well and is nice to look at too! He finds the interior to be roomy and comfortable.
Before you decide, I would read up on the stolen car info. The last thing you want is to have your car stolen. Even though my Dad loved his RSX, he would NEVER buy one again
|
- #87 of 102
-
Integra or RSX?
by rsx_va
-
Dec 14, 2005 (10:33 am)
-
|
Here's the list of the ten most frequently stolen cars, from State Farm's website (compiled by the National Insurance Crime Bureau, nicb.org):
1995 Honda Civic
1989 Toyota Camry
1991 Honda Accord
1994 Dodge Caravan
1994 Chevrolet Full Size C/K 1500 Pickup
1997 Ford F150 Series
2003 Dodge Ram Pickup
1990 Acura Integra
1988 Toyota Pickup
1991 Nissan Sentra
I don't see the RSX anywhere on this list.
|