Sign In Join 

Toyota RAV4 2006

4668 messages,  Last post on Jan 08, 2010 at 8:33 PM

You are in the Toyota RAV4 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Toyota RAV4, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 468
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
468
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6 of 4668
Re: [lexi4life] by alpha01
Jan 31, 2005 (8:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lexi4life (Jan 31, 2005 5:37 pm)

I think you're wrong, and I've read in more than Motor Trend that the RAV would be getting a V6 in this coming, third generation.
 
~alpha
#7 of 4668
makes sense by nippononly
Feb 01, 2005 (7:05 pm)
Reply
because HL will undoubtedly become a substantially bigger vehicle with its own redesign scheduled to come very soon, so even if RAV gets an optional V-6, it will still be a lot smaller.
 
Not to mention, I bet the next-gen Highlander will not have a 4-cyl for the base engine. You can kiss those days goodbye.
 
Whereas I bet if they put an optional V-6 in the mix for the RAV, it will sell in Camrylike proportions: 3/4 or more 4-cylinder, 1/4 or less V-6. Most people want a small versatile SUV that DOESN'T suck gas like the monster SUVs, that's part of the reason they look at RAV in the first place. I hope they boost the fuel economy of the 4-cyl significantly without boosting power (why boost power when there's an optional V-6 with juicier profit margins available?) for '06.
 
As for me, I would say the rear end looks like a cross between a Touareg and the Isuzu VehiCross - remember that one? The front end looks OK for a Toyota, but did the sides really need to get EVEN MORE chunking up than they already have?? The pics sure make it look longer than it is now.
#8 of 4668
RAV4 V6 by a_l_hubcaps
Feb 01, 2005 (9:48 pm)
Reply
http://www.donlen.com/buildstart_toyota.asp
 
Note the entry for "RAV4 V6", with a job 1 date of 1/06. That site is almost always accurate -- they are a fleet leasing company so they have to know what's available. There are some other interesting Toyota tidbits in that chart too.
 
-Andrew L
#9 of 4668
note also by nippononly
Feb 01, 2005 (10:25 pm)
Reply
that the only engine available at the launch of the next gen RAV will be the 4-cyl, with the V-6 to lag behind it by two months. That furthers my conviction that the volume engine for the RAV will be the 4-cyl.
#10 of 4668
3rd Row Seat by carnovice3
Feb 02, 2005 (2:06 pm)
Reply
I have heard some rumors that the '06 Rav4 will have a 3rd row. Has anyone heard anything about this? Also, does anyone know if you'll still be able to get a manual shift? Thanks.
#11 of 4668
carnovice by nippononly
Feb 02, 2005 (3:21 pm)
Reply
I hope not, and I hope SO, in that order!
 
It will probably be Toyota SOP: announce a base model with a stick shift so as to make the model's base price sound really low, then only build a dozen or so manual shifts for the entire country. And I will bet that the optional V-6, if there is one, will come packaged only with the automatic, which hopefully will be the 5-speed from the Camry etc (since the 4-cyl engine is shared between the two models).
#12 of 4668
3rd Rows by wheelz4
Feb 03, 2005 (7:55 am)
Reply
Actually, I wouldn't mind if the new Rav had a 3rd row, even if it was only for kids/occasional use. I've been looking into the Mazda5, but if I could get something similar, with a little more ground clearance and AWD, it would be a done deal.
A 4+2 or 5+2 Rav just might fit the bill, as the nearly $40,000 7 passenger Highlander is way out of our budget.
#13 of 4668
three rows by nippononly
Feb 03, 2005 (8:36 am)
Reply
would kind of take a lot of the "cute" out of this cute ute. Make it too big and it gets lost in the ocean of midsize crossovers, not to mention it begins to steal HL sales.
#14 of 4668
Re: three rows [nippononly] by kirstie_h HOST
Feb 03, 2005 (10:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Feb 03, 2005 8:36 am)

Exactly what I was thinking - not everyone wants a 3-row SUV, and these mini-SUVs are designed to suit that taste, while the Highlander is designed for those who want/need a 3rd row.
#15 of 4668
yeah, besides by nippononly
Feb 03, 2005 (1:17 pm)
Reply
even the least expensive of the crossovers/SUVs that offer a third row sell in a higher price class than the RAV, except maybe the Suzuki XL-7, or something like that. So if the price is the only turn-off to the three-row HL for you, then you should be aware that (a) there are cheaper alternatives than the Toyota, and (b) you have to ante up a little more money than the range of the RAV to get a three-row SUV.
 
I can just imagine how long the RAV would have to be to accomodate a third row - it would completely change the nature of the vehicle.

Messages Page 2 of 468
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
468
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?
Connect with Facebook Sign In Using Your Facebook AccountNew!

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement