- #4576 of 4666
-
Re: 1996 Rav 4 impression after 5K miles [flyingn]
by raviola4
-
Dec 29, 2006 (5:45 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: flyingn (Dec 29, 2006 5:34 am)
Hopefully i'm not in a time warp and you actually mean the 2006 Rav 4.... I've had my 4 cyl. Rav4 now for 9 months. Had the infamous hyroglyphics crap with the 6 disc system, but replacement unit is fine. Unfortunately i have had the lag issue on several occasions. Overall runs great, but on those few occasions, it's a scary situation to say the least (when another car/truck bearing down on you and the car can't get out of it's own way due to this 2-3 second lag problem. I'm running car a little harder now, not babying it so that might help. Although round town mileage since i bought dropped from 23.5 to just over 20 mpg. But overall no other complaints. Winter's been unusally warm and that's supposed to continue here in Delaware, so may not get a chance to try it out in snow this year. Heck the grass is still plush/green. Unreal. Happy New Year to all.
|
- #4577 of 4666
-
tsb out for throttle lag
by flyingn
-
Jan 01, 2007 (1:37 pm)
-
|
Yes I mean the 06 rav.
Ya know that there is a TSB out on the throttle lag issue. Go see the dealer for a reflash of the prom..
|
- #4578 of 4666
-
TSB on lag issue?
by raviola4
-
Jan 02, 2007 (4:49 am)
-
|
|
Thanks, i'll check dealer. First i've seen/heard of a TSB issued for the RAV4.
|
- #4579 of 4666
-
Re: Mileage, control [thecat]
by flyingn
-
Jan 12, 2007 (4:54 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: thecat (Nov 30, 2006 7:04 pm)
BTW- acording to Toyota the v6 requires 91 or higher octane and the 4 requires 87 or higher..
|
- #4580 of 4666
-
Re: Mileage, control [flyingn]
by ateixeira
-
Jan 12, 2007 (9:25 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: flyingn (Jan 12, 2007 4:54 am)
Source? You sure it says 91 is required, and not merely recommended?
-juice
|
- #4581 of 4666
-
Re: Mileage, control [ateixeira]
by kdhspyder
-
Jan 12, 2007 (12:56 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jan 12, 2007 9:25 am)
-juice is correct of course.
|
- #4582 of 4666
-
Re: Mileage, control [flyingn]
by thecat
-
Jan 12, 2007 (3:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: flyingn (Jan 12, 2007 4:54 am)
My owners manual says 87 octane ?????????
That's all that I've ever put in it and it runs fine.
|
- #4583 of 4666
-
Octane rating...V6 2006 RAV 4
by jimdrew
-
Jan 12, 2007 (7:06 pm)
-
|
I also run 87 and it runs great...I see no reason for higher octane rating. My service adviser says 87 is fine.
Jimmy Drew
|
- #4584 of 4666
-
Re: Mileage, control [ateixeira]
by flyingn
-
Jan 14, 2007 (9:30 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jan 12, 2007 9:25 am)
yes Im sure. but you can use 87 if you would like but Toyota says 91 or higher on their official ducuments... not in the owners manual. Using 87 is a selling point. Thats why they say use it in the manual. But in reality 91 is what it was calibrated for. Not to worry tho It will run fine on 87
|
- #4585 of 4666
-
Re: Mileage, control [flyingn]
by raviola4
-
Jan 15, 2007 (4:54 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: flyingn (Jan 14, 2007 9:30 am)
Our other car is a 2003 Accura TL. Manual recommends premium fuel, but we run 87 octane. And 3 different Accura service departments all agreed 87 fine. Just don't get the higher performance. Seems to have good enough performance for us.
|