Sign In Join 



Toyota Tacoma vs Honda Ridgeline

547 messages,  Last post on Jan 20, 2009 at 1:43 PM

You are in the Toyota Tacoma Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Toyota Tacoma, Honda Ridgeline, Car Comparisons, Truck


Messages Page 3 of 56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#16 of 547
Re: unimpressed so far [rsholland] by explorerx4
Feb 06, 2005 (2:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Feb 06, 2005 1:29 pm)

i view a pickup as a very flexible platform. how does the 'ridge improve upon that? i still stick to my opinion that they answered a question nobody asked. do you or have you ever owned a pickup? i'm just curious, not trying to cause a conflict. your opinion is valid, i'm just interested on what you base it on.
#17 of 547
Re: unimpressed so far [explorerx4] by gearhead1
Feb 06, 2005 (5:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Feb 06, 2005 2:28 pm)

Well, I was going to buy a 05 Taco sports package, but now after spending a significant amount of time on the Ridgeline site, I'm going to wait at least till I've seen the Ridgeline in person. Honda has come out ahead of the Tacoma at least in features. It appears to be a city all wheel drive pickup, but then Honda throws a serious offroad feature like a locking rear diff on it as a standard feature on all Ridgelines, which toyota puts only on their offroad package, though the Ridgeline has a inch less clearance. The 4 wheel drive kicks in automatically which I think is more appealing than a partime system which could be damaged on dry pavement if left engaged accidently.
 
Their tow package is also standard on all Ridgelines. It's available only as a feature in Toyotas 3,000 dollar offroad or sports package
 
Hondas new bed design beats Tacoma all to hell with their great inbed trunk and a tail gate that opens in 2 directions. No more climbing in to your bed over your tail gate. This is the most innovative thing I've seen in a pickup bed, and the spare is actually accessible easily.
 
Leather interior, navigation, moonroof are available. These features are absent on the tacoma. What's up Toyota!? Are we in the new Millenium are not? Get with the program.
 
Ridgeline has a independent 4 wheel suspension delivering a true Sedan ride on a truck!
 
The only innovative I see on the 05 Taco is the new composite bed, of which I've seen a pic of one cracked (probably due to owner retardation, but it wouldn't have happened if it were steel). they also have available a 120 volt 400watt receptacle in the bed which is kind of cool, though I'm not sure what I would use it for.
 
Just a little thing, but the Rideline has a locking gas door, unlike the free access to all gas cap on the Taco. Yeah, I'm paranoid. Just don't piss any kids off in your nieghborhood if you have a Taco.
 
All this said I'm still leaning toward the Taco, but they better cut me one hell of a deal Mr. Toyota dealer, because it won't take much to nudge me over to the Ridgeline.
#18 of 547
Re: unimpressed so far [gearhead1] by explorerx4
Feb 06, 2005 (5:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gearhead1 (Feb 06, 2005 5:14 pm)

gearhead1, looks like the 'ridge will work for you. hope you enjoy whatever you buy. based on your comments, i'm not sure why you are buying a pickup type vehicle. whatever your reasons are, they are ok with me, i just am not sure what they are.
#19 of 547
by gearhead1
Feb 06, 2005 (5:41 pm)
Reply
I don't think I mentioned my use requirements, but if you need to haul, the Rideline will allow 4x8 buiding material to lie flat in the bed unlike the Taco.
 
I've driven a Toyota 2wd pickup for the last 14 years and I love it. Never had a problem. It's that relationship that compells me to still lean towards Toyota, and the new Tacos look great.
 
I now have needs that require hauling and off road access more than ever.
#20 of 547
Re: unimpressed so far [explorerx4] by rsholland
Feb 06, 2005 (7:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Feb 06, 2005 2:28 pm)

do you or have you ever owned a pickup? i'm just curious, not trying to cause a conflict. your opinion is valid, i'm just interested on what you base it on.
 
Yes. I used to own a '86 F-150 4x4. I had it for roughly 10 years. I don't currently own a pickup, but I follow them very closely. I've also examined the Ridgeline up close, both at Detroit, and again yesterday at Philly.
 
The rear 2-way tailgate and bed trunk are ingenious. Those features are only possible thanks to the IRS (again, long overdue on pickups) on the Ridgeline. I think you need to examine one at your local car show, or wait for them to show up at Honda dealers next month. I think once you see it firsthand, you'll see what I'm saying. This vehicle is going to rewrite the game plan for family-oriented pickups. It's not perfect. There are several features missing that I wish it had; but it is mighty close to being perfect.
 
Bob
#21 of 547
Ridgeline by jfigueroa1
Feb 07, 2005 (8:27 am)
Reply
It look like a nice vehicle, all of these goodies cool stuff. But all of those things sure will come at a price. I am seeing reports of the vehicle starting at around 27,000 remember the taco 4 dr rwd start at around 22,000.
I think the Honda Ridgeline and the Toyota Tundra should be the one going head to head.
greetings
fig.
ps. I bough a taco 2wd a/t sport pack .for 24,200 will be in next week.
#22 of 547
Re: Ridgeline [jfigueroa1] by rsholland
Feb 07, 2005 (8:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: jfigueroa1 (Feb 07, 2005 8:27 am)

Need to compare apples-to-apples; the Ridgeline should to be compared to a 4x4, not a 2WD.
 
Bob
#23 of 547
Re: Ridgeline [rsholland] by xwesx
Feb 07, 2005 (10:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Feb 07, 2005 8:36 am)

I agree with you wholeheartedly on many points you have illustrated in this topic (and others), Bob. While I hope to not be in the market for a new vehicle to replace my '96 Subaru OB for another 3 years, I have seriously been leaning toward a small CC pickup to be both my Subaru and my '69 C20. I want to retire the '69 as a work truck one of these years to restore it (only needs some touch up) and then not use it for in-bed payload; hopefully just some parades & periodic towing.
 
The ridgeline will definitely be on my short list come shopping time. With a small maxi-dump trailer, I should be able to use it admirably as a family car and also haul the equivalent with the trailer as my '69 does in its bed alone. On the rare occasion that I do need 3-8 ton towing, I can break out ol' yeller to supplement.
 
I have already removed the Tacoma from that list, at least for the time being (we'll see again in 3 yrs).
#24 of 547
Re: unimpressed so far [rsholland] by explorerx4
Feb 07, 2005 (5:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rsholland (Feb 06, 2005 7:42 pm)

bob, my only point is that the bed area is over designed. i am not trying to discourage anyone from buying one.
#25 of 547
Re: unimpressed so far [explorerx4] by rsholland
Feb 07, 2005 (5:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Feb 07, 2005 5:13 pm)

my only point is that the bed area is over designed.
 
And more power to Honda for doing so, and may they reap the rewards (aka sales & profits) that all those overdesigned features are bound to bring.
 
Bob

Messages Page 3 of 56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
56
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement