Sign In Join 



MazdaSpeed3: Styling Impressions

548 messages,  Last post on Aug 08, 2007 at 5:21 PM

You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDASPEED MAZDA3, Hatchback


Messages Page 33 of 55
1
...
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#321 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [rorr] by seanwms6
Jul 13, 2006 (3:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Jul 13, 2006 2:03 pm)

Rorr, I found it once and I will find it again, but I think the Japanese MS Atenza has a substantially higher rating than the MSP 6. More than the 6 hp difference between the MS Axela and the MSP 3. If correct that signifies to me that the Oz MSP's really are detuned. I'll post as soon as I find the info which I think came from a Mazda news release.
#322 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [seanwms6] by seanwms6
Jul 13, 2006 (4:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: seanwms6 (Jul 13, 2006 3:48 pm)

http://www.mazda.com/publicity/release/200506/0623b.html
 
This press release lists the MS Atenza's power rating as 200 kw (268 hp). Seems like a 10 kw / 14 hp difference would be the result of something other than different methods of measurement.
#323 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [seanwms6] by rorr
Jul 14, 2006 (4:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: seanwms6 (Jul 13, 2006 4:33 pm)

Thanks sean. I think you're right; there's got to be more going on that just differences in measurement methodology.
 
Oh well; I think I'll stop flogging this dead horse. It's all conjecture anyway until Mazda releases the official specs. Perhaps they're a bit gun-shy after the release of other models with what turn out to be inflated hp numbers.
#324 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [rorr] by chacobleu
Jul 14, 2006 (7:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Jul 13, 2006 2:03 pm)

I know there's been some criticism over the quality of USA fuel vs. Europe or even Canada. I think most of the criticism has been centered around diesel fuel, but not all.
 
I don't know what type of fuel they use in outback land, but I do know that a higher/lower quality fuels have been known for power spec differences (again, as seen in the world of racing).
 
Then there is air quality such as altitude, air temp., humidity, etc., that will change a vehicle's characteristics from day to day or sometimes in the same day.
 
Seems too trivial especially without knowing at least some of the above.
#325 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [chacobleu] by rorr
Jul 14, 2006 (9:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: chacobleu (Jul 14, 2006 7:25 am)

"I think most of the criticism has been centered around diesel fuel, but not all."
 
Yep. Not sure about 'critisms' of our gasoline however (can't necessarily directly compare Octane ratings either since Europe (and Australia) uses the RON ratings (Research Octane Number) while we use the average between the RON and the MON.) Otherwise identical gasoline is rated 4 to 5 points lower under our system than the European ratings.
 
From what I understand, the new MSP3 (like the MSP6) in the U.S. will 'require' 93 octane (measure under our system). Yes, it should run okay with lower octane fuel, but won't make as much same power (due to the ECM adjusting the timing).
 
It's quite possible that Mazda decided that there is adequate availability of 93 octane fuel in the U.S. to tune the MSP6 for 274hp. The flip side is that the equivalent fuel may not be AS available in Australia so Mazda tuned the engine for more of a midgrade blend. I haven't seen the fuel requirements for the AU market MSP3 or MSP6, so I don't really know.
 
Yes, atmospheric effects will certainly change the power output. And yes, this is all pretty trivial. I guess we're all just passing the time until we get some more real news (or driving impressions) regarding the Speed3.
#326 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [rorr] by seanwms6
Jul 14, 2006 (12:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Jul 14, 2006 9:21 am)

"I guess we're all just passing the time until we get some more real news (or driving impressions) regarding the Speed3."

Yep.
#327 of 548
Re: Nice Aussie review, more than the usual fluff, I think [seanwms6] by seanwms6
Jul 14, 2006 (12:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: seanwms6 (Jul 13, 2006 8:11 am)

"And remember, folks, the MPS is rated at 248 hp. Looks like we will see 260 plus."
 
FYI: 248 hp is incorrect. It came from http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/motoringpreviews/200846/mazda_3_mps.html. But Oz Mazda says the spec is 190 kw or 254 hp, so maybe the 248 hp is just for the euro-spec MPS.
#328 of 548
In case you missed it... by kronogoose
Jul 17, 2006 (6:47 pm)
Reply
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=116119#3
 
 
#329 of 548
Re: In case you missed it... [kronogoose] by rorr
Jul 18, 2006 (7:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: kronogoose (Jul 17, 2006 6:47 pm)

Thanks for the heads up.
 
Looks to be a fairly positive review. What I'd REALLY like to see (at some point) would be a comparison test between the Speed3 and the other current hot hatches in the segment (VW GTI, Civic Si, Cooper S).
 
Also, I noticed mention that the engine torque is 'managed' in the first THREE gears, rather than just 1st and 2nd. That's WAY too much 'management' IMO.
 
Does anyone know if the DSC system can be turned off (completely or to some degree)? Also, I wonder if the torque management through the first few gears can be similarly turned off?
#330 of 548
Re: In case you missed it... [rorr] by seanwms6
Jul 18, 2006 (7:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: rorr (Jul 18, 2006 7:04 am)

I agree about the limiting of gears 2-3. 1st I can definitely understand limiting 1st, 'cause in my MS6 the ratios are so close 1st is over before I know it. But by 3rd you're well on your way and I don't see why it wouldn't be a noticeable annoyance. I think the DSC is off when it says it is. But I doubt they'll allow you to turn of the power management in 1-3, 'cause a big reason it's there to cut down on Mazda's warranty repair costs. At least that's the best reason I've heard for including it.

Messages Page 33 of 55
1
...
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
...
55
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement