You are here:
Forums
Pickups
Toyota Tacoma
Toyota Tacoma vs Nissan Frontier

1428 messages, Last post on Jul 02, 2008 at 6:58 PM
You are in the Toyota Tacoma Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
Replying to: toykick (Oct 02, 2005 2:49 pm) First let me say that I think the Tacoma is a very nice truck and I considered one when I bought my Frontier. That being said I take issue with you on the quality being much less in the Frontier than in the Tacoma. I am not sure what your definition of quality is, but I did not see that much difference in the two trucks when I was looking at them. When the interior is considered there are quite a few that think the Tacome is far superior. Maybe it is just my poor taste but I actually prefer the Frontier interior. When I look at reliability Consumer Reports does not show that much difference in the two. In 2004 Tacoma was much better than average right down the list. In 2004 the Frontier was rated better than average in only 4 areas; electrical,suspension,brakes, and body integrity. In 2003 Tacoma again had much better than average in all categories, but body in- tegrity where it rated an average. The Frontier had a better than average rating in body integrity and body hardware. I would call that a wash. Since reliability is one of the most important things to me I don't see much difference in the two. These figures are on an average so as close as they are you could get a good one or bad one from either manufacturer just by the luck of the draw. I have had 8 Datsuns/Nissans over the years and I have never had a bad one. I have had 2 Toyotas, a 2000 Solara which my wife is currently driving and a 1969 Crown which I bought new. The Solara is one of the best cars I have owned and we have done only normal maintenance on it in the 5 years we have been driving it. On the other hand I kept the Crown less than a year and it spent more time in then shop than on the road. Like I said, you can get a bad car from any manufacturer just as you can an excellent car. I think that when two trucks are as good as these, they are both worth taking a chance on. OkieScot
|
|
|
Replying to: 2005lekc (Oct 02, 2005 6:06 pm) Keep in mind that these two trucks are of new design for 05 and should not necassarily be compared with past vehicles as far as reliability goes. I have faith in both these companies. |
|
|
Replying to: driver56 (Oct 02, 2005 5:46 pm) I bought a 2005 Tacoma Double Cab 4x4 long bed. The length does take some getting used to for someone coming from a B3000 regular cab for sure. I hope in 6, 7 years, I think of it as a good purchase, and I certainly hope the same holds true for the Frontier buyers as well. May we all be happy with our trucks! Wayne
|
|
|
Replying to: dockeen (Oct 02, 2005 7:30 pm) The Tacoma is quite a big step up from the B3000 in many ways so enjoy. Time will be the best judge of the choices we make. Enjoy your new purchase! Mike
|
|
|
Replying to: time2 (Oct 02, 2005 4:46 pm) Well like you guys said time will tell... Nissan improved a lot this year on JD powers but so did other manufacturers... Whats really weird to me is how Hondas luxury brand is having more issues then HONDA... |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: driver56 (Oct 02, 2005 8:03 pm) |
|
| Albeit professional, Motor Trend's opinion is just that. Many other professionals have their opinions and they never agree all the time. So what is it? Keep an open mind and educate yourself and then make your own. You've got to love the competition Nissan and Toyota have created ; two solid companies producing good quality vehicles. This alone can do nothing but good for us all. That said, I believe Ford, G.M., Chrysler have decent products to offer. The bar has been raised! | |
|
Replying to: toykick (Sep 28, 2005 5:41 pm) Click for larger image. The only statement anywhere about why to run 91 octane fuel is in regards to improved performance. Nothing about longevity being affected by running higher octane levels. For the average person driving a V6 Tacoma, 87 octane is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: goofball (Oct 03, 2005 9:13 pm) However, how much power does a pickup this size need to do its job? Even if the tacoma had 210 HP instead of its 240, or whatever it is by the new standards, it'd still do just fine in almost any situation it'd be asked to handle. In reality, neither the tacoma or Frontier need as much power as they do, but it is nice to have. I don't know if it is true, but some say using premium will get you better gas mileage in the tacoma, so it may be better to use it, despite the addition cost of gas. With modern technology, power is up, while economy is not being lost, which is great. The whole tacoma vs frontier power debate is over-hyped. Either is more than powerful enough for its size. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Pickups
Toyota Tacoma
Toyota Tacoma vs Nissan Frontier
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Frontier
2011 Toyota Tacoma



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats