Sign In Join 



Ford F-Series Real World MPG Numbers

134 messages,  Last post on Jun 07, 2009 at 5:57 PM

You are in the Ford F-Series Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Ford F-350, Ford F-150, Ford F-250, Fuel System, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Truck

If you're looking for a place to discuss real world mileage figures for your Ford F-Series pickup, this is the place!


Messages Page 13 of 14
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#119 of 134
Re: Moding the Engine. [germantech] by stevedebi
May 29, 2008 (10:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: germantech (Dec 12, 2007 2:02 pm)

"I've had carbureted cars that didn't have even one computer that got better than this."
 
Cars that could tow the same amount of weight? Cars that weighed in excess of 5000 lbs? Cars had had the drag coefficient of a brick? Cars that had the same large engine?
 
Full size pickups have all of the issues; each one causes a decrease in MPG.
 
Having said that, you might check out the driving tips from the various hybrid forums. The "battery" related stuff (like EV - "electric mode") won't help, but there are other tips that can help.
 
Research has shown that leaving the tail gate on a pickup is the most aerodynamically efficient.
 
Try and keep moving. By this I mean don't tailgate, and try and slow gradually when approaching a red light - it may turn green before you get there. Remember (in town) the biggest issue is that you have to get that 5000+ lbs up to speed - and that takes energy. MPG directly relates to the speed being traveled and the RPMs of the engine, so try and find the "sweet spot" of your engine for in town use where the RPMs are lowest for the highest speed achieved.
 
On the highway, reduce to the lowest safe speed that you can stand, preferably 60-65 MPH. The higher you go, the worse the MPG.
 
My last pickup was a 1996 F150, but it had the 4.2 and a manual transmission. It returned 17 MPG city / 23 MPG highway. But at the time I wasn't driving for MPG, except in the city where I used the OD at normal speeds where possible.
#120 of 134
4.6 mileage by laci73
Jun 03, 2008 (7:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 22k2 (May 23, 2008 5:43 pm)

04 f150 4x4 supercab. smaller V8, got it 2 month ago, 170 000kms on it. Rear end is 3.73.Tires 265/70 r 17 BFG AT.Driving to work and for fun( fishing, exploring country) I'm averaging 13-14 litres per 100 km's.combine driving city-hwy -gravel roads. I did 1000 kms trip in the mountains last weekend, at one tank. 135 litres tank and still some gas left.
the key is keep rpm less than 2000, even in the city. Have no upgrades, stock vehicle.
just my rear end is bit of whining, when under a load or accelerating. I changed gear oil for full synthetic 75W-90, but did not help at all.
#121 of 134
1998 ford f-150 extended cab 5.4 liter mpg by titaneese
Jun 12, 2008 (5:31 pm)
Reply
I owned a 1998 ford f-150 extended cab 5.4 liter and drove it for 10 years. I thoroughly checked the mileage over time and without the A/C it would get 13.5 mpg in the city absolutely babying that thing. I did not do enough highway driving to comment on that. My new truck is a Toyota Tacoma 16.68 mpg city. My two complaints with the ford, poor mpg and my service experience was b/s. I realised after the way Ford treated me that they did not care at all that I was loyal to their brand. they were more interested in how much they could take advantage of me and get all they could as far as service $$$$$$$$$$. Sorry ford but I have a 67 mustang, a 66 ford truck & now a Lexus and a Toyota truck in my garage. I am done with your b/s.
#122 of 134
2007 F350 DRW 6.0 PSD Crew Cab by uptickguru
Jul 28, 2008 (11:43 am)
Reply
I own a 2007 King Ranch F350 Dually with every option short of a sun roof. I am getting around 17-19 on the highway unloaded, 12-13 pulling my tractor appx 9000 lbs, and about 12-14 in the city. I don't drive like grandma but I don't race bmw's either though I think this thing could probably take a few of them.
 
Have been looking into adding cold air intake and possibly big exhaust for added MPG. Don't need anymore power as this thing will pull a tree outta the ground. Have talked to Banks and it's a pricey $1300 upgrade. Was wondering if anyone has any experience with this? I don't want to go missing with it too much cause of the warranty on the powertrain is 100K which I think is pretty good. Any Pro's and Con's. I don't trust talking to these equipment reps cause they mostly want to sell you this stuff and could care less about your warranty.
  
     I'm trying to get a call in to talk to a few Ford Diesel guys. Would appreciate any opinions or experiences with Banks or any other reputable diesel performance houses.
#123 of 134
Re: 2007 F350 DRW 6.0 PSD Crew Cab [uptickguru] by 96ford
Aug 27, 2008 (12:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: uptickguru (Jul 28, 2008 11:43 am)

What Gear Ratio do you have? What is your RPM at 70 MPH? I am considering buying a F350 4WD with a 4.3 ratio. I'm afraid of bad mileage and have found that it will cost $2500 to change the ratio to a more reasonable 3.73
#124 of 134
4.6L Owners-Happy With Your Fuel Mileage? by rpinks_99
Jan 21, 2009 (9:32 am)
Reply
I know none of us are "happy"....but I'm about to trade up from my 3.0 (2006) Ranger to an F-150 4.6 super cab.
 
Other than the EPA estimates for fuel mileage, how big a shock will I get with the 4.6? I don't get that great a mileage with my Ranger, approx 16 mpg on average.
 
I drive conservatively (I'm 56, and my fast years are far behind me!).
 
Any thoughts opinions appreciated!
#125 of 134
Re: 4.6L Owners-Happy With Your Fuel Mileage? [rpinks_99] by jjess4
Jan 21, 2009 (12:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rpinks_99 (Jan 21, 2009 9:32 am)

I have an 02 4.6 liter F-150 Supercab. I was only getting 16 mpg when I bought it. When I took it in, the service geniuses told me that it is the "breaking in period". I have never gotten anything different since... I know part of it is that I drive 69 mph on the freeway.
#126 of 134
Re: 4.6L Owners-Happy With Your Fuel Mileage? [jjess4] by rpinks_99
Jan 21, 2009 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jjess4 (Jan 21, 2009 12:22 pm)

Thanks, jjess4. Maybe "69" isn't the good number for you...lol....maybe try 68 or 70!
 
I'll likely get a Tonneau cover; studies shows that's about the best accessory (other than mechanical mods) that will increase mileage.
#127 of 134
Re: 4.6L Owners-Happy With Your Fuel Mileage? [rpinks_99] by odd1
Jan 23, 2009 (9:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: rpinks_99 (Jan 21, 2009 1:06 pm)

Independent studies have shown no difference in gas mileage with a tonneau cover. Myth Busters did a show on it that you can google the results of.
#128 of 134
Re: 4.6L Owners-Happy With Your Fuel Mileage? [odd1] by gregg_vw
Jan 25, 2009 (7:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: odd1 (Jan 23, 2009 9:13 am)

I thought that was about tailgate up or down (results: no difference). I don't think Chevy would install a tonneau on its Silverado mileage leader, unless it was actually doing something to help mileage.

Messages Page 13 of 14
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement