Sign In Join 



To Fix Up or Trade Up, That is the Question

536 messages,  Last post on Jul 24, 2009 at 9:12 AM

You are in the Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Car Safety, Tires, Wheels, Auto Body, Brakes, Engine, Interior, Paint, Transmission, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), Buying Insurance, Coupe, Convertible, Hatchback, Truck, Sedan, Wagon, SUV, Van


Messages Page 53 of 54
1
...
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#518 of 536
Re: 03 Acura TL 85000 miles [oldfarmer50] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
May 06, 2009 (4:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (May 06, 2009 3:52 pm)

Well then, you're one of the few, the brave, the chosen! Good for you.
#519 of 536
Re: 1995 Taurus SHO Body Damaged [Mr_Shiftright] by rockshocka1
May 07, 2009 (4:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (May 06, 2009 2:30 pm)

The M1A1, & every other track vehicle I've crawled around in considerably, are very cramped. I don't know if they offer more room than previous generations, but if they do, I would not want to try getting in one of the old ones.
 
However, the Army has added comfort touches to non-track vehicles. Over the last few years they've gone automatic, deciding it was too hard to teach the troops how to use a manual. Air conditioned cabins & cup holders! It's very entertaining to see new models when they roll in & what features have been added.
#520 of 536
Re: 1995 Taurus SHO Body Damaged [rockshocka1] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
May 07, 2009 (6:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: rockshocka1 (May 07, 2009 4:00 am)

Automatic duece and a half trucks go way way back. They make great farm trucks.
#521 of 536
Re: 1995 Taurus SHO Body Damaged [Mr_Shiftright] by maryh3
May 07, 2009 (7:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (May 05, 2009 8:01 am)

Car photos at:
 
http://www.carspace.com/maryh3/Albums/maryh3%27s%20Album/DC00004.jpg/page/photo.- html#pic
 
http://www.carspace.com/maryh3/Albums/maryh3%27s%20Album/DC00003.jpg/page/photo.- html#pic
 
http://www.carspace.com/maryh3/Albums/maryh3%27s%20Album/DC00005.jpg/page/photo.- html#pic
#522 of 536
Re: 1995 Taurus SHO Body Damaged [maryh3] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
May 07, 2009 (7:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: maryh3 (May 07, 2009 7:29 am)

Lots like more than $1000 bucks to me. Looks like the hood is sprung, radiator top brace torn up, and receptacles for headlight and parking light torn up. Not sure if the fender has been driven back a bit. I guess you could cobble it up for $1000 but it's not going to look very good. There will be all kinds of alignment issues for the headlight.. and of course when you open the hood you're going to see the damage. I'd say $3000 was an accurate estimate.
#523 of 536
Re: 1995 Taurus SHO Body Damaged [bolivar] by maryh3
May 07, 2009 (8:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: bolivar (May 06, 2009 1:30 pm)

Though you are taxing my memory the 1989 SHO had a recall on the clutch. I'm almost embarrassed to tell you how I remember but, here goes. We received a recall for 'premature clutch wearout" which was good for a certain period of time and below 80,000 mi (I think) SHO's which replaced the clutch for free. However the car needed to display sign of clutch wear. We had about 70,000 on ours but it was doing just fine no slipping, no softness or hardness etc.
 
Once you receive information like that you realize that it is probably just a matter of time before your clutch starts to wear, and you don't want to lose the recall replacement clutch. So we started to try to wear out the clutch. We shifted stupidly, let it out fast, drove with the clutch slightly depressed but we just couldn't seem to have any effect. Finally as the recall was close to expiring somebody told us to drive the nose of the car upto a solid brick building so it can't go anywhere, then push the accelerator and let out the clutch. Well that one did it. Got a new clutch under the recall.
 
Other than that the 89 gave us no trouble. We traded it in because we had kids and stick shifts with babies and toddlers are a nuisance.
 
Haven't experienced torque oversteer with the 95 SHO, don't remember with the 89. Had an 88(?) Ford Probe Turbo that was almost dangerous with the oversteer so I do know what it is.
#524 of 536
Re: by sky23213
May 07, 2009 (9:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (May 06, 2009 2:18 pm)

3 gallons to the mile, too
 
Actually, that's good. According to the tank guys when I served, their T-72s were at 318 liters per 100km (that's how mileage is represented in Europe). Converted that's 0.75 mph!
They are tight by default, but I think an old T-34 felt a little more spacious than the T-72. They had a crew of 4, I think, so it had to accommodate 3 in the turret (same as T-55). The 72s had a crew of 3 (only 2 in the turret) - they dropped the Loader (aka the Slave of the Tank ).
But, man, that thing could go!
#525 of 536
Well..... by fezo
Jul 23, 2009 (12:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sky23213 (May 07, 2009 9:50 am)

Never expected to be in this topic as more than a spectator but here goes.
 
The 00 Accord at 170K or so need at very least a new compressor for the AC. Now they tell me that once the compressor is in that two other parts could be needed but they won't know until they do the compressor. (One part was a dryer; I can't remember the other). If it's all three we are talking $900.
 
BTW, it also needed a wiper motor but I have to do that as it's pouring as we speak. $200. The good news is all this rain has been keeping it cool enough that I may be able to buy an extra several months on the AC....
 
So what do you think? Sink the $900 into it? It still runs just fine and is a good year away from the next timing belt....
#526 of 536
Re: Well..... [fezo] by qbrozen
Jul 23, 2009 (12:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Jul 23, 2009 12:08 pm)

$1100 for an '00 Accord? Sure.
#527 of 536
Re: Well..... [fezo] by euphonium
Jul 23, 2009 (1:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fezo (Jul 23, 2009 12:08 pm)

$1100 invested into a known vehicle makes more sense than the $3,000 PLUS depreciation you would take on a replacement as soon as you cross the curb.

Messages Page 53 of 54
1
...
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement