Sign In Join 



Ford Explorer Sport Trac (2007+)

339 messages,  Last post on Oct 16, 2009 at 12:37 PM

You are in the Ford Explorer Sport Trac Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Ford Explorer Sport Trac, Truck


Messages Page 7 of 34
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#61 of 339
'07 Sprottrac sighted. by pnewby
Mar 09, 2006 (11:31 am)
Reply
Saw a new one yesterday on a dealers lot in Lexington, Ky. Didn't get a close up since I was driving at the time.
#62 of 339
ok so where are the reviews? by once_for_all
Mar 09, 2006 (1:13 pm)
Reply
Isn't it normal to get some reviews around the time of a new vehicle release?
 
C'mon, this is the best thing to hit the truck market since the Ridgeline.
 
John
#63 of 339
Reviews, Ridgeline by fsmmcsi
Mar 09, 2006 (7:08 pm)
Reply
once_for-all - you have a good point. I also have not found a single review, yet it is on dealer lots. I guess than this may be evidence of a bias in favor of Japaneese vehicle manufacturers.
 
The Ridgeline had a nice wide interior and large bed with plenty of storage, but is horribly ugly inside and outside and has too little engine for too much vehicle. Plus, the bed is part of the vehicle, so rattling noise from cargo will be far more easily transmitted to the interior than in the Sport Trac, which has a separate bed/box.
#64 of 339
Re: Reviews, Ridgeline [fsmmcsi] by bamacar
Mar 09, 2006 (8:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fsmmcsi (Mar 09, 2006 7:08 pm)

I too don't understand why the SportTrac has not had any reviews yet, but I disagree on most of your Ridgeline review. The exterior is not very attractive; I agree. The interior looks good, the truck rides better than anything else out there, and there has not been any complaints of bed noises that I have noticed. The 3.5 is excellent just as it is in the Pilot and Odyssey. The vehicle would only need a 8 cylinder for heavier towing, and the only midsize with an 8 is the Dodge Dakota. It is not blazingly quick, but gets the job done nicely just like the Ford 3.0 in the Five Hundered and Freestyle. Of course there are a lot of complainers on the Fords, too.
#65 of 339
Re: Reviews, Ridgeline [bamacar] by once_for_all
Mar 09, 2006 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bamacar (Mar 09, 2006 8:06 pm)

ya, well, it won't take long for the Sportrac vs Ridgeline debates to flare up.
 
I like the Ridge, I think it is a well put together package--best one out there (so far).
 
But I won't get a truck like these until I see 24 mpg highway. IMO, it will take a turbo diesel to do it.
 
Ford has the best chance of following through on that.
 
John
#66 of 339
Re: Reviews, Ridgeline [once_for_all] by once_for_all
Mar 09, 2006 (8:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: once_for_all (Mar 09, 2006 8:14 pm)

lol this is too funny. I read my own post from last month and find out I said the same thing as just now.
 
Sorry to be boring guys, I guess there isn't much to talk about yet
 
John
#67 of 339
Re: Reviews, Ridgeline [once_for_all] by bamacar
Mar 09, 2006 (8:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: once_for_all (Mar 09, 2006 8:14 pm)

I agree none of the competitors in the small to midsize class get good enough fuel economy. I too would be a buyer of a diesel in this class. I don't know who will do it first. I will be surprised if Ford does it to this model before it does it to the F150s. I hope the SportTrac gives the Ridgeline, Tacoma, and Frontiers some real competition.
#68 of 339
Fuel Mileage vs Reality by fsmmcsi
Mar 09, 2006 (10:06 pm)
Reply
While I agree that we need to go to Diesel engines, I suggest working out the annual and monthly fuel cost of different vehicles before getting too concerned over the fuel mileage differences. I drive 35,000 miles per year, but with regular gasoline at $2.50, an Explorer Limited RWD V8, the closest thing to the SportTrac for which mileage data has been published, would cost me $111 more per month than the too-small hatchback car rated at 20 city and 30 highway I now have. The inconvenience of having to stop for three more fillups per month is far more significant to me than the $111, but neither is significant enough to be a factor in choosing one vehicle over another.
#69 of 339
2007 Sport Trac by matrusjon
Mar 10, 2006 (5:39 pm)
Reply
I work at a ford dealership and we got three in today. One limited and two of the XLT models. Thats the only two models offered in 2007. The interior is pretty much the same as the Explorer. Along with the front end looking like an eddie bauer with the "nostrals" at the sides of the grille. It's available in 2wd and 4wd as well as the 4.0l V6 and the 4.6l V8. You also have the option of a 5 speed or a 6 speed automatic transmission. You could fit a motorcycle in the bed but I would recommend getting the bed extender if you are planning on doing that. They are really nice. If you have any questions email me and I'll get back to you asap.
#70 of 339
2007 Sport Trac by captjchin
Mar 10, 2006 (7:23 pm)
Reply
Placed my order for a V8 XLT in Dark Stone Metallic after a test drive night before last. REALLY QUIET and nice ride. Can't wait to get my hands on it.

Messages Page 7 of 34
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement