Sign In Join 



Ford Explorer Sport Trac (2007+)

339 messages,  Last post on Oct 16, 2009 at 12:37 PM

You are in the Ford Explorer Sport Trac Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Ford Explorer Sport Trac, Truck


Messages Page 14 of 35
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
35
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#123 of 339
Re: Some shortcomings of the 2007 Sport Trac [safemike1] by congeni
Mar 30, 2006 (4:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: safemike1 (Mar 26, 2006 1:00 pm)

The door handles where redesign for better safety and most likely well be copied by other car makers
#124 of 339
Disappointment, Door Handles, Box and Tailgate by fsmmcsi
Apr 01, 2006 (9:17 pm)
Reply
I finally saw a Limited V8 in a showroom, but did not bother to drive it after looking at the box and tailgate.
 
I only have one bulky item to carry regularly, a 15' Little Giant ladder which is 55" long and 22" wide when fully collapsed. I could only fit it in the box sideways, with various twisting, and a very ackward and back-wrenching reach over the tailgate. Ford really goofed by not giving it a five foot bed and the old Ford station wagon tailgate design (open down or out) now used on the Ridgeline. No, I am not going to buy a Ridgeline - it is extremely ugly, is slow, and rides rougher and noisier than I want.
 
The door handles will be changed for the 2008 Explorers and Mountaineers, so do not expect this horrible design goof to be labeled a "safety advance" and be copied by anyone!
#125 of 339
Re: Tire Thumping [bailey9] by paul512001
Apr 02, 2006 (1:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: bailey9 (Mar 23, 2006 8:35 am)

Go for the Toyota, or a Honda, or even a Nissan. I had a 2001 Sport Trac, what a waste of money. Head Gasket started leaking at 18K, Ford refused to acknowledge there was a problem. Fuel mileage was horrible, lucky if I got 14 MPG. Fit and finish was sub par. Late 2004 I went with a Honda and will never look back. Family members having been driving a variety of Honda's since 87, and yes it is true, they are far superior to domestic cars. Sure, the Japanese cars have problems too as they are built by humans, but they are much less frequent.
#126 of 339
Re: Disappointment, Door Handles, Box and Tailgate [fsmmcsi] by captjchin
Apr 02, 2006 (3:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: fsmmcsi (Apr 01, 2006 9:17 pm)

It would be nicer yet if it had a 6' bed, but look at the overall length. I guess you'll do better with a pick up truck with crew cab.
#127 of 339
2007 sport trac by congeni
Apr 02, 2006 (11:54 pm)
Reply
Like to know if I could find a after market window for the back that I could open.
#128 of 339
Test drove the 4.6L yesterday. by ayarbo1
Apr 05, 2006 (7:02 am)
Reply
My wife and I test drove the 4.6L V-8 yesterday at Troy Aikman Ford here in Dallas. It was nice, it drove really well and we liked the smooth ride. I was impressed with the Class IV tow hitch that is rated as a 7200lb weight distributing hitch. It appeared to be integrated into the frame and it looks solid. We're going to wait until the Navigation system is available before we order one. I'm also hoping that they offer a rear window that opens as well.
#129 of 339
Re: Some shortcomings of the 2007 Sport Trac [congeni] by kman1956
Apr 07, 2006 (5:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: congeni (Mar 30, 2006 4:02 pm)

Have about 200 mi. on my 2007 ST V-8 as well, gas mileage really does blow, about 12 MPG, they claim that this engine needs 5,000 mi and that we can expect 2-5 mpg improvement, sticker is 13/20 I think, be nice if it made it there.
Anyone have the 2007 V-6? What kind of mileage are you seeing?.
 
I never recall any of my other Ford (or Porsche/or Volvos) MGP improving after break-in?! We will see.
 
I will say it feels way more solid than the old model, corners extremely well and rides like an F-150 and you can't even feel the 6-speed tranny shift, pretty sweet and "carbon-fiber" accents, rubber floor and overall interior treatments are very nice. By the way, try grabbing the door handles palm up, work way easier, little change from the normal, but it is OK, not a deal-breaker.
 
It is going off-road this weekend, I will let you know...don't know if Independent R suspension is the best thing for off road, we will see, should handle the wash-boards better in any case. Can't find stats anywhere for ground clearance...anyone know, even the dealer answered with the ole' shoulder-shrug? Have a good weekend gentlemen.
#130 of 339
Re: Some shortcomings of the 2007 Sport Trac [kman1956] by jagu
Apr 08, 2006 (5:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: kman1956 (Apr 07, 2006 5:27 pm)

Have the V6 - getting about 12 in the city and 20 on the hwy.
#131 of 339
My review of the new sport trac by mustangguy74
Apr 14, 2006 (2:35 pm)
Reply
Reading this forum can be humorous sometimes. I drove a new sport trac last week and was fully impressed. My mindset going into the test drive was fairly negative about the sport-trac, thinking that I would probably purchase an 05 Explorer or 05 Mountaineer to reap the big discounts available. After test driving all 3, my decision is easy. I'll purchase a new V-8 sport trac hands down. The sport trac offers a powerful, quiet, and a very stable drive much akin to its big brother, the F150. A few of my thoughts about previous posts in this board:
 
In regards to complaining about the V8 sport trac milage compared to a Honda Ridgeline, lets look at the #'s
 
Ridgeline: 3.5L V-6; 247 hp; 245 lb-ft torque, 5000# towing capacity, mileage: 16 city / 21 highway
 
V8 sport trac: 4.6L V8; 292 hp; 300 lb-ft torque; 6600# towing capacity, mileage: 14 city / 20 highway
 
The performance difference between the 2 is very significant if you intend on towing boats, trailers, misc. like I intend on doing. Yes, it's going to cost me more at the pump. But the 300 lb-torque will be enjoyed at the boat ramp pulling a boat and trailer out of the water. My suggestion...if you're not going to pull anything, don't by the V8!! Or better yet, consider an Escape or the new Edge which are designed to be PEOPLE movers, not TRUCKS.
 
The Ridgeline does have some attractive features like the extra storage in the bed. And I agree that the door handles in the sport trac are very different, but it's definitely not a feature that will turn me away from buying this truck. I think I can adapt to a door handle. LOL. My only question is, WHICH COLOR TO BUY???!!
#132 of 339
Re: My review of the new sport trac [mustangguy74] by kman1956
Apr 14, 2006 (3:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mustangguy74 (Apr 14, 2006 2:35 pm)

Say 'Stang: Couldn't agree more, after test driving Nissan, Honda, Chevy, Dodge, Toyota, this is the best mid-sized truck on the market unless you are a serious rock climber. And, after a full 2 weeks of ownership, I like the '07 Sport-Trac even more! Everyone who has ridden in it can't believe the ride and feel, in fact, a friend admitted it is as nice on the interior as the '06 Chevy Tahoe, and $15,000 cheaper! Incidently, the heated windshield option is very trick during the rain, instant fog clear.
 
My main disappointment, as stated before, was that the mileage was well below the stated mileage, but... floor the pedal getting onto a long interstate on-ramp and you can't believe you are in a truck, this baby is very fast. Can't wait to add a K & N and put a cat/back in it and then it will also be the best sounding truck on the road as well. I say look at a burgundy red one, I went with traditional gloss black...and the door handles, please...they feel mormal already?! What is the fuss? Can't wait to push that 4x4 Low button this Summer at the bottom of the boat ramp!

Messages Page 14 of 35
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
35
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement