Sign In Join

2007 BMW M3 (E92)

202 messages,  Last post on Apr 02, 2008 at 8:01 AM

You are in the BMW M/M3/M6 Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? BMW M3


Messages Page 16 of 21
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
21
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#148 of 202
Re: 2006 M3 Convertible. Good Deal? [brodsky] by habitat1
Sep 10, 2006 (4:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: brodsky (Sep 09, 2006 4:21 pm)

"What does "proper break in" on an M3 entail?"
 
Pretty much the same thing that is required/recommended on my Porsche 911 or former Honda S2000. Namely, don't exceed certain RPM's (4,200 in the case of the 911, with a 7,200 rpm redline), don't drive the car for short distances that doesn't give the engine oil time to fully heat up and the seals, gaskets and other engine parts time to fully expand and then contract (i.e. should be driven 15-20 minutes), avoid hard accelertion when the engine isn't warm (and still keep within aforementioned rpms), don't use cruise control and vary engine speeds on highway trips, etc.
 
The average Lexus, Toyota and GM engine doesn't require much care during break in. But high performance engines like the M3 do. And that has always been a concern of mine when I have considered used cars or worse, demos. I just have difficulty trusting that a car like the M3 has been test driven in a way that conforms to the above recommendations. When I was shopping for a Honda S2000 several years ago, a stupid salesperson threw me the keys to a brand new car and said 'let it rip". The S2000 is NOT supposed to be V-teched (exceeding 5,500 rpm) during break in and the long term performance of the car is noticably affected if it has been. So even "new" S2000's with 40-50+ miles on the odometer became off-limits for me.
 
If the M3 you are considering was actually the personal car of the dealer, I would ask him to give you written assurance that the car was properly broken in. If I'm not mistaken, there is even a way on the M3 to download info from the engine computers as to the maximum RPM's the engine has been run at and for how long. Ask him to give you that report. My local BMW dealer refused to replace a blown engine under warranty on an M3 that had been abused during break in.
 
Bottom line, I would not buy this car - or any "used" performance car - at a price that wasn't substantially below what I could get a new one for. I'd rather sleep at night knowing I properly broke the car in than wondering. Since you'd be leasing, maybe it's not as big a deal for you.
#149 of 202
Re: New stats on the 2007 M3 [emorexls] by jmaroun
Sep 11, 2006 (5:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: emorexls (Aug 18, 2006 6:12 am)

There's no "competition or sports package" equivalent in the list of options you've posted. Hopefully this will be the case; that the new M3 will come basically in one optimal flavor. It would mean minimal choices to agonize over. It's bad enough I'll have to choose between a 7-speed SMG-III and 6-speed manual tranny. I'll also have a tough time deciding on the Navigation system. Not to mention of course, the agony of dishing out the big dollars. Regarding the Rear Spoiler Deletion..what spoiler are they talking about?? Haven't seen a spoiler on any of the spyshots.
 
It would be nice if someone could update us with the latest news.
 
Joseph
San Diego I
 
Major Standard Equipment
Adaptive Xenon Headlights
Carbon Fiber Roof
SMG III 7-Speed transmission with DRIVELOGIC
18" M Double Spoke Alloy Wheel
18x8F/18x9R with P235/45ZR18 Front, P265/40ZR18 Rear Performance tires.
  
Invoice $49,117
Base Price USA Port of Entry* $53,975
  
Vehicle Options List
Metallic paint $475
Nappa leather $1,450
Carbon fiber trim $300
Aluminum trim NC
Comfort Access $500
M Multifunction Seats with Active Width Adjustment $1,900
Front Heated Seats $500 / ZCW
Power Rear Sunshade $350
Head-Up Display $1,000
Navigation System w/I-Drive $2,100
Power Rear Sunshade $350
Rear Park Distance Control $350
19" M Double Spoke alloy wheel $1,750
19x8.5F/19x9.5R with P235/40ZR19 Front, P265/35ZR19 Rear Performance tires.
Logic 7 sound system $1,200
SIRIUS Satellite Radio $595
High Definition Radio $500
Premium Package (ZPP) $3,100
Cold Weather Package (ZCW) $750
6-speed manual transmission NC
Rear Spoiler Deletion NC
#150 of 202
Re: New stats on the 2007 M3 by diablo_negro
Nov 07, 2006 (1:19 pm)
Reply
I just wanna know who thinks that a BMW 3.3L is a such a super high performance engine. It does have a lot in the design of the engine but I can make just as much power with a GM 2.8L in a fiero or camaro. The engines are already broken in when they are installed in the car becouse they have to drain the oil to remove excess assembly lube and check the seals and re tighten
head and intake bolts. the M3 motor is the same as the 330i and the 328i just the displacement and such. Dont get me wrong
i love the M3 but just don't think that some people know what they are talking about.
#151 of 202
Re: apples & oranges [habitat1] by omniceribrus
Nov 20, 2006 (8:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Aug 26, 2006 6:31 pm)

sorry to quote that entire passage but I had to put my 2 cents in...
 
well ok as an STi owner for 2 years, I can say Im fed up with the people who think my car is for 17 year old ricers. First of all, not many kids can afford that car. Secondly there is a good reason they have wet dreams about it. Simply put as far as performance goes, there are very few cars under 100Gs that can compete. And style wise, the interior and exterior is amazing for the price.
 
As for comparing the STi to a Porsche or an M3, that is something I can do very well, since I looked at all 3 before making my descision.
 
So let me take Habitat's comments and apply them to my car compared to his Porsche and an M3....
 
-Take it to the track - Thats what its made for
 
- beat almost anything on the street: Now I dont know where he got 3.9 seconds from, but the STi goes 0-60 in somewhere between 4.6 to 4.8. It might not beat a Viper or a Z06, but it WILL beat an M3 (I already have) and most Porsches (Ive beat a couple of Carreras already). It sticks like glue to the road and inspires better road confidence than my test drive with an M3 did. Not to mention the whirring sound of the turbo spooling is sheer heaven.
 
- look really cool / head turner: My car turns plenty of heads, and doesnt give off the "I have something to compensate for" aura that a Porsche does. However I will admit its not a chick magent, it is for people who love to drive.
 
- take a couple of friends to the club on a Saturday night: It can fit 5 people easy, with no noticible compromise in performance. Which is good, especially if you ever consider a little something called "practicallity"
 
- take a hot date out to dinner on a week night: Also perfect, and you can also fit the hot date's hot friends without needing to stuff someone in the cargo space.
 
- comfortably take my mother out to dinner: and your father and uncle too...
 
- fit a mid size surf board...: sadly the back seat doesnt go down, to increase frame rigidity, but with the money you will save over a Porsche or M3, get a beater car instead for hauling stuff.
 
- Put a cooler in the trunk for beers....: Even if you dont play the "sports" that some people play, you can fit plenty of beer in the very roomy trunk. But if you prefer playing 'hole in one' with all your male friends you can do that too. (sorry I love to rag on golf)
 
- fit all my groceries in the trunk after going to Costco: once again if you don't like your cars with "bonnets", and know what practical is, then the problem with that Porsche is obvious
 
Oh and did I mention it is all wheel drive, unlike the M3 and some Porsche?
 
Well when it came down to it, I thought I could either spend upwards of 70Gs on a Porsche or M3, or I could spend 30Gs on an STi, a car which is specifically rated among the top ten best value-holding cars.
If you are the kind of person that likes spending 40 grand on a name, then by all means the Porsche or Beamer is the way to go. However if you can find better uses for 40Gs than sinking it into a car that will lose that value in 4 years, then consider an STi, or an S2000 if you want a convertible. Personally, I took that 40Gs, got my wife a nice new car, remodeled my kitchen and bathrooms, and had money left to spare.
But hey, If you are filthy rich and dont live in the real world, I guess that isnt a problem.
#152 of 202
Re: New stats on the 2007 M3 [diablo_negro] by zeppelin2
Dec 23, 2006 (4:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: diablo_negro (Nov 07, 2006 1:19 pm)

diablo_negro, do you mind explaining yourself a bit better?
 
As I see it, there is absolutely no comparison:
 
BMW M3 (E46): 3.2L I6, 333hp, 262ft-lb
Chevy Camaro (LB8): 2.8L V6, 135hp, 165ft-lb
#153 of 202
Re: New stats on the 2007 M3 [zeppelin2] by david911
Jan 30, 2007 (5:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: zeppelin2 (Dec 23, 2006 4:06 pm)

This new pic shows some funky mirrors:
 
http://auto-future.blogspot.com/2007/01/2007-bmw-m3.html
#154 of 202
When do we get a peek? by jmaroun
Feb 15, 2007 (12:30 pm)
Reply
I heard somewhere on the forums that in early March, there will be news. I hope so, that's only a few weeks away. Can anyone confirm this??
 
I'm on the waiting list at BMW of San Diego.
 
Joseph
San Diego
#156 of 202
BMW E92 M3 by fedlawman
Jun 02, 2007 (4:49 pm)
Reply
#157 of 202
E92 M3 by fedlawman
Mar 08, 2007 (8:18 pm)
Reply
Pictures from the Geneva premiere of the new M3.
 
http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-m3.html
 
Wallpaper.
 
http://www.dieselstation.com/archive/BMW-M3-Concept-2007/
 
Video.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv-F8PnaJf4
 

Messages Page 16 of 21
1
...
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
21
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement