Sign In Join 



2009 Toyota Corolla

3074 messages,  Last post on Aug 04, 2009 at 6:36 PM

You are in the Toyota Corolla Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Corolla, Sedan


Messages Page 264 of 308
1
...
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
...
308
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2631 of 3074
Re: For example... [cz75] by kdhspyder
Apr 12, 2008 (6:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: cz75 (Apr 10, 2008 12:09 am)

It's you and C&D that are trying to force a comparo between unequals. There is no comparo. The sporty Si and others are far more fun to drive. No question. The Corolla will make more money. No question. End of comparo.
 
It only comes down to money. It's a business nothing more. It's not a beauty pagaent. The XRS is an ultra small volume trim in what is essentially a very very basic commuter / people mover. It's also no competition to the IS nor the 3-series or any other sport model just to complete the picture. Wasting more than a passing thought on it is a gross waste of time...and paper, in the case of the C&D article.
#2632 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [nippononly] by kdhspyder
Apr 12, 2008 (7:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: nippononly (Apr 11, 2008 12:24 pm)

Actually I think Americans 'demand' less in their economy vehicles. This very same discussion is being held all over the GM boards and the Ford boards; i.e. Why are the NA versions of the very very nice Euro vehicles so blah, basic and decontented?
 
The simple answer is we in NA don't want our econo-boxes to have much content. Price if far far more important than either performance or content. We are much more willing to spend big bucks for midsized autos than for small autos. On the contrary in Europe and Japan they spend much more on their high volume small vehicles.
 
If we want our econo-boxes to be $18000 -$20000 then we get a decontented model. If we want to spend $25000-$30000 for a Civic, Corola or Jetta then we will get more content.
#2633 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [kdhspyder] by backy
Apr 12, 2008 (8:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Apr 12, 2008 7:00 am)

The simple answer is we in NA don't want our econo-boxes to have much content.
 
Then why does Toyota put options like high-zoot stereos, Bluetooth, navigation, and leather on the Corollla?
 
Personally I don't need any of that "content" in an economy car. What I want are basic things like a comfortable driving position, a nice-looking interior with quality surfaces and controls, a roomy back seat, a good blend of ride and handling, and as many safety features standard as possible, including ABS, side curtain airbags (with good crash test scores to boot), and ESC. And of course good fuel economy and reliability. The Corolla delivers on the last two very well (well, we'll see about reliabiilty but history is in its favor.) The others, not as well. How about more focus on the basics and less on the "flash"?
#2634 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [backy] by jaxs1
Apr 12, 2008 (8:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Apr 12, 2008 8:16 am)

Bluetooth is no big deal anymore and isn't very expensive if it's installed on the factory assembly line rather than added on later.
#2635 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [jaxs1] by backy
Apr 12, 2008 (8:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Apr 12, 2008 8:50 am)

If Bluetooth were so inexpensive to add on the assembly line, I expect we'd see most if not all economy cars, including the Corolla, offer it as a standard feature. Yet no cars in the economy car class offer it as a standard feature, and not all offer it as a factory option. Maybe because the automakers realize that buyers know there are less expensive ways to have a Bluetooth-enabled phone in a car than buying the factory Bluetooth option.
 
As for me, I'd rather the automakers focus on features like comfortable/adjustable driver's seats, roomy back seats, and crisp handling rather than fancy electronics that I can get elsewhere, for less money.
#2636 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [backy] by jaxs1
Apr 12, 2008 (9:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Apr 12, 2008 8:58 am)

Bluetooth used to be only on the high-end expensive cell phones a few years ago and now it's on many of the phones the carriers give away free with contract.
Automakers are just slow to adopt new things. It took years of customer pressure before GM finally relented and will start installing bluetooth on most of their vehicles next year instead of pointing to their fee-based OnStar service as the handsfree solution.
 
Automakers were slow to adopt CD players, so people had get third party changers until factory installed CD players became common. Then aux audio inputs were the next thing and now bluetooth.
 
There are still some new cars that don't even have an aux jack, but it has become expected at this point. Bluetooth will also be expected soon.
.
So what if it isn't "standard" on every car? The cheapest cars don't have a/c and cruise control standard, but it's an option. Cars as cheap as the Nissan Versa now offer factory bluetooth as an option.
#2637 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [jaxs1] by backy
Apr 12, 2008 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Apr 12, 2008 9:07 am)

Yes it does. But it doesn't offer an important safety feature, ESC, at all, and ABS is an option vs. standard.
 
I think automakers have their priorities skewed. But maybe it's not their fault. If buyers keep demanding electronic gizmo features like Bluetooth more than they do safety features, nice seats and controls, modern suspensions and accurate steering, etc., then whose fault is it? Not the automakers I guess. So we can get Bluetooth on the Corolla, whoopty-doo, but we have to rest our elbows on hard plastic and fight to get a comfy driving position.
#2638 of 3074
let the flood of discounts begin... by nippononly
Apr 12, 2008 (11:56 am)
Reply
In the paper this weekend, three different volume dealers have opened the floodgates.
 
All '09 Corolla LE automatics, $1500 off MSRP (dealer discount) all in stock (about 70 cars between the 3).
 
All '09 Corolla XRS automatic in stock, $2000 off MSRP.
 
All '09 Corolla 5-speed base models in stock, MSRP $16,1, sale priced $14,448.
 
No factory rebates so far, but you know those aren't far away, maybe a couple of months.
#2639 of 3074
Re: That Makes No Sense [backy] by kdhspyder
Apr 12, 2008 (12:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: backy (Apr 12, 2008 8:16 am)

There's two rationales...both have to do with making money not surprisingly.
 
Why so many al a carte 'toys'? As noted above that's what generates buyer enthusiasm in the largest segment of buyers. Look at Ford's humping of SYNCH. It sells. They turnover of the SYNCH models is significantly shorter than the ones not equipped with it.
 
There are a lot of safety-conscious buyers too but that equipment has all the excitement of a good biology text. I think that Toyota and others got quite a surprise when the Prius took off and a lot of the buzz was over 'Prius toys'. 'Flash' sells.
 
As to why even offer the option of thses geegaws? I'm postulating that it's because Toyota expects that during this Gen's lifetime that fuel is going to skyrocket and this segment will become the 'hot' one as more and more people try to downsize to save fuel costs. THEN at that point our econoboxes might begin to approach the Euro versions.
#2640 of 3074
Re: For example... [kdhspyder] by cz75
Apr 12, 2008 (4:20 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kdhspyder (Apr 12, 2008 6:14 am)

And a Civic Si ISN'T an ultra small volume trim of what is also a basic people mover? I'm glad there's no question that the Si is a better car, but to say that the XRS isn't Toyota's half-assed attempt at trying to make a sport trim for their basic econobox is asinine. It has SPORT seats, a SPORT strut tower brace, blacked out SPORT grille, a spoiler and SPORT rocker moldings, larger alloy wheels & tires, more power and better brakes than the lower trim levels, or even the XLE model. Don't blame me or C&D for thinking Toyota came up short on what was intended to be a "sport" trim level and has been in past Corolla generations.
 
Toyota charges too much for delivering too little, but as you pointed out, that won't stop what is a mediocre car from becoming a sales success, for a while at least. That there is no comparison is Toyota's fault and, for what is a new car, I haven't read a single article that implies the Corolla is remotely the sort of innovative and original design that the 8th generation Civic was (and is) in its class. Rather, it is an also-ran and one that could be interpreted as another instance of Toyota becoming complacent, thinking that anything they make, even if the quality is slipping (recalls) or the features and design are second to their competition, they can sell all they make, no questions asked.

Messages Page 264 of 308
1
...
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
...
308
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement