You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Chevrolet Cobalt
Chevy Cobalt vs. Ford Focus

76 messages, Last post on Nov 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM
You are in the Chevrolet Cobalt Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: brookesmithey (Mar 31, 2005 9:54 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dieselg4 (Dec 13, 2004 12:51 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: spchampton (Aug 06, 2005 5:30 pm) Here are a few stats and comments from Car & Driver magazine regarding your Cobalt and my Mazda3: Cobalt: 2.2-liter, DOHC 16-valve inline four with twin balance shafts: 145 hp Mazda3: 2.3-liter, DOHC, 16-valve inline four with twin balance shafts and variable valve timing: 160 hp Acceleration, seconds: Cobalt, 0-60 mph: 8.4 Mazda3, 0-60 mph: 7.4 (Both had manual transmissions) And acceleration isn't everything. What did C&D think of that old-fashioned twist-beam rear axle in the Cobalt? "Still, extra body roll and softer helm responses—there's a reason twist-beam axles aren't on F1 cars—mean less entertainment for the Cobalt driver than for drivers in some other value cars, notably the Focus and Mazda 3." Hmmm. Some other stats they measured: Braking, 70-0 mph Cobalt, 188 ft Mazda3, 169 ft Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: Cobalt, 0.77 g Mazda3, 0.87 g Now, get an SS and maybe we'll have something here -- but keep in mind that it's no longer in the same pricing league as the Mazda3 -- C&D reports the base price of the Cobalt SS is $21,995, and the SS it tested had a sticker of $24,560. My 2005 Mazda3s hatch had a sticker of just over $17.5K. I guess the moral to the story is, bring some numbers with you next time. There are too many variables in traffic-light drag races (including a big one -- the honesty of the reporting party) for them to be very reputable against actual measurements taken by the automotive press under much more controlled conditions with people who know how to drive cars. Meade P.S. Styling is very subjective. But since you went there, we had a '95 Cavalier in our driveway for five years and the Cobalt looks WAY too much like it 10 years later. |
|
|
Were you "racing" a 3i or a 3s? Do you know the difference? Meade |
|
|
|
|
I guess the moral to the story is, bring some numbers with you next time. Mazda 3i [2.0 liter] 144hp/135tq Cobalt [2.2 liter] 145hp/155tq (obviously a big advantage here) Mazda 3s [2.3 liter] 160hp/150tq (less than the base Cobalt) Cobalt SS[2.4 liter] 170hp/170tq (to be released) Mazdaspeed 3 [???] ???hp (to be released) Cobalt SS S/C [2.0 liter] 205hp/200tq So there are the numbers - the Cobalt wins on power easily (it also weighs an extra hundred pounds). Is it the better car or the better performer - different discussion. These are just the numbers. |
|
|
let's drop the Mazdas from this conversation since they are not part of the topic. |
|
| I had a 2000 Focus and loved it, but totalled it in a wreck and I replaced it with a Cobalt. Although I loved the Focus, I have found that the Cobalt is a much smoother, quieter, solid car. Very comfortable, and gets better gas milege than the Focus. I went into the Cobalt because of the employee discount deals, which Ford now also has, but didn't at that time, or I may have bought a new Focus, but am really glad that I tried the Cobalt. The only thing I don't like about the Cobalt is that the trunk opening is small. It has an ample trunk but the opening is small and higher than the Focus, so it is hard to get something big and heavy in by myself. | |
|
|
|
I've never owned a domestic car, but I actually like the Cobalt. I think it's decent looking (especially compared to the Cavalier) and the interior is a huge improvement for GM. The Focus is really looking old to me. The new Focus interior helps some, but not enough. Also, I hate that only the ST has the 2.3L and all the others have the weak 2.0L. At least on the Cobalt they offer a choice of the 2.2L with 145hp or 2.4L with 171hp. The forgotten domestic subcompact seems to be the Ion. It's a little cheaper than the Cobalt with the same drivetrain on the same platform. I think it looks better than the Cobalt, but you do have to contend with the center mounted instruments. Sadly, when the introduced it in '03 it was only half-baked. Improvements for '05 has actually made it competitive but no one really seems to notice. |
|
|
|
My daughter is buying her first car. Unfortunately neither she nor I know anything about these two. What is the bottom line? we are looking for cheap but dependable transportation. she has to buy an American car (for work related reasons) and these are the two we have come down to. Are either one dependable?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: welcenbach (Nov 02, 2005 8:37 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Chevrolet Cobalt
Chevy Cobalt vs. Ford Focus
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
2010 Ford Focus



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats