Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Classic Cars Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"
19442 messages, Last post on Dec 09, 2009 at 11:20 AM
You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
|
Replying to: explorerx4 (Nov 04, 2009 4:23 pm) 
|
|
|
Replying to: xwesx (Nov 04, 2009 5:10 pm) 
|
|
|
Replying to: oregonboy (Nov 04, 2009 6:00 pm) 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: texases (Nov 04, 2009 7:38 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: explorerx4 (Nov 04, 2009 5:08 pm) So if a standard 5-liter carbureted V-8 with 100,000+ miles on it can easily pass an emissions test, I'm guessing there's plenty of wiggle room for much bigger, higher performance engines...provided they're tuned up correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 05, 2009 7:05 am) Here's how it works in California at any rate: "The basic intent of the California engine change laws is that when you do an engine swap, the new engine/transmission cannot pollute more than the original engine/transmission. This means the newly installed engine must be the same year (or newer) as the vehicle, and all emissions controls on the newly installed engine must be installed and functional. Also, you can't put a heavy-duty truck engine (over 6000 lb GVW) into an S-10 Truck because heavy-duty truck engines have less stringent emissions limits than light duty trucks. To get your engine swap approved, you must go to a Referee Station." source: http://www.jagsthatrun.com
|
|
|
Shifty - quite right. Now I know why a lot of late-model Saabs meet a premature death and go to the big parking lot in the sky. Also, I just had to share this note - a friend of mine recently traded in her '98 900 SE Turbo 5-speed sedan (it was giving her a lot of trouble) for a new Acura. And - she only received $800 for a trade-in! This was for a rust-free New England car with 120k miles on it! Man, she was so angry that she swore off Saabs forever.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jrosasmc (Nov 05, 2009 8:50 am) It's more like hedging a bet. Most people won't gamble more than they can afford to lose. For a Saab with a bad head gasket, I wouldn't gamble more than the $$$ I could get for it in a junkyard. |
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 05, 2009 8:11 am) And, while a 403 would pollute more than a 307, it might still be clean enough to pass the test. Well, actually I could see California's standards for 1989 being strict enough that a '77-79 engine with 1/3 more displacement wouldn't cut it, but in Maryland it would probably pass. How far back do they do emissions testing in CA? In Maryland, they go back through 1977, so my '76 LeMans just missed it. However, you can get historic tags on anything that's 1989 and older (1990 as of January 1, 2010), and with historic tags you're exempt from emissions testing.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 05, 2009 9:43 am) CA tests vehicles from 1976 on up. Again, what comes out of the tailpipe doesn't matter. You could put a 2005 Prius engine into a 2008 Hummer and you'd fail the smog test.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
