Sign In Join 



Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"

19340 messages,  Last post on Nov 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Classic Cars


Messages Page 1648 of 1934
1
...
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
...
1934
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#16471 of 19340
Re: What about this one? 78 Alfa Spider or 1980 Spider [qbrozen] by lokki
Jan 15, 2009 (11:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 15, 2009 10:43 am)

Thanks ... doubt if I'll get to actually buy either one.... Mrs. Lokki doesn't have a case of Spider-bite fever, like I do.
 
Re your bumper pain.... You have my sympathy.... Mrs. Lokki had a close encounter with a Grand Marquis a couple months ago. Different accident, but based on the same fundamental failure to grasp the laws of physics. Fast left turn on a cobblestone street in a rain storm. Original heading due West - turning South - Hit the Marquis (which was facing North) in the driver's door. To this day she has no idea why it happened.
 
My recommendation on the bumper question is to go to a nice warm quiet room and then have two or three scotches before you go out and look at the car again. I hate to recommend drowning sorrows in good Scotch to anyone, but it's always worked for me.....
#16472 of 19340
Re: What about this one? 78 Alfa Spider or 1980 Spider [lokki] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jan 15, 2009 (11:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: lokki (Jan 15, 2009 10:25 am)

Alternator is $185 bucks + labor of course.
 
I'm not all that fond of SPICA fuel injection. If you get a 1982 on up you get Bosch injection. Doesn't rev quite as nicely but far more reliable.
#16473 of 19340
Re: great! [qbrozen] by boomchek
Jan 15, 2009 (11:21 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 15, 2009 10:32 am)

Ouch. I was thinking you can just buy and attach the black piece onto the bumper cover but it seems like the bumper cover itself sustained damage.
 
This bumper cover sounds and looks fairly complicated. I'm guessing about $2k to replace/fix.
#16474 of 19340
Re: [Mr_Shiftright] by stevedebi
Jan 15, 2009 (1:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 14, 2009 1:17 pm)

"Oh did they finally upgrade? That must have cost a pretty penny. Yeah, I was reading a somewhat dated article, so that makes sense. "
 
I saw a passing reference to the equipment upgrade in the book "Comm Check", about the Columbia disaster.
#16475 of 19340
Re: great! [boomchek] by stevedebi
Jan 15, 2009 (1:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boomchek (Jan 15, 2009 11:21 am)

"Ouch. I was thinking you can just buy and attach the black piece onto the bumper cover but it seems like the bumper cover itself sustained damage.
  
This bumper cover sounds and looks fairly complicated. I'm guessing about $2k to replace/fix. "
 
I'm not sure, it looks like the cover may be in three pieces, and only the one side piece seems broken. Maybe it can be replaced separately, but even that with paint would be several hundred.
#16476 of 19340
Re: great! [boomchek] by qbrozen
Jan 15, 2009 (6:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: boomchek (Jan 15, 2009 11:21 am)

actually, the paint is all still good, as is the bumper cover. It just won't go back into place because she crushed the bumper support. And, yes, 3 parts is correct. They are the bumper cover, metal bumper support, and plastic bumper support. I've been doing research and it seems I'm looking at about $500-$600 in parts. I've tracked down most of it at saveswedish.com. My shopping cart is up to $380, but I'm still missing the foglight surround and foglight housing.
 
Here's the diagram:
 

 
I believe I'm looking at parts 3, 4, 7, 10, 12, and 16 for starters. But part 7 in this diagram is sans foglight.
#16477 of 19340
Re: [stevedebi] by srs_49
Jan 16, 2009 (4:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: stevedebi (Jan 14, 2009 12:55 pm)

I'm pretty sure they upgraded the electronics of the shuttle fleet in the early 1990's. I believe Columbia was the last one upgraded.
 
Yes, you're right.
#16478 of 19340
Re: [Mr_Shiftright] by srs_49
Jan 16, 2009 (4:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jan 14, 2009 1:17 pm)

But I imagine all military hardware must remain more obsolete than if it were on the commercial marketplace. Can you imagine the lines of code you'd have to write for a space shuttle?
 
Believe me, you don't know the half of it. It takes a new military program 15-20 years to go from concept to being deployed and used by troops in the field (F-22 Raptor, for example). Many of parts designed in at the beginning are obsoleted before the product is fielded. That's one of the reasons why there's so much money to be made providing field support and upgrades for existing systems.
#16479 of 19340
Re: [srs_49] by texases
Jan 16, 2009 (7:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: srs_49 (Jan 16, 2009 4:39 am)

Think about keeping up the B-52s. 50 year old technology!
#16480 of 19340
Re: great! [qbrozen] by boomchek
Jan 16, 2009 (10:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jan 15, 2009 6:07 pm)

Whatever happened to bumpers being bumpers.
 

Messages Page 1648 of 1934
1
...
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
...
1934
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement