Sign In Join 



Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"

19378 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 6:53 AM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Classic Cars


Messages Page 1625 of 1939
1
...
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
...
1939
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#16237 of 19378
Tempo/Topaz... by andre1969
Dec 28, 2008 (8:34 am)
Reply
my stepdad had a 1984 Tempo 2-door. It always seemed like a cheap piece of crap, but it did manage to make it to around 160,000 miles on the original drivetrain...mostly highway driving. I know it had some problems along the way, but can't remember now what all it needed. I think the two biggest problems with the car were performance and fuel economy. This thing was dog-slow. I drove it once. My 1980 Malibu coupe, not exactly a powerhouse with its 115 hp 229 V-6, felt like a musclecar in comparison! I have a 1985 Consumer Guide that timed a Topaz from 0-60 in 15.9 seconds. For comparison, they had a Plymouth Reliant that managed it in about 13.5, a Toyota Camry that did it in about 13.4, and a Honda Accord that was around 11.6...all of them automatics. They didn't show a 0-60 time for the Cavalier they tested, but rated it a "3", which would have put it similar to the Camry and Reliant, most likely. The Accord had been rated a "4", and the Topaz got a "2" in that category.
 
As for fuel economy, I think my stepdad could get around 20 mpg around town in that Tempo, but on the highway it would only do around 25-27 or so. It would take an act of God to have gotten 30 mpg out of that car! Now part of the problem was that it only had a 3-speed automatic, rather than a 4-speed. And the 4-cyl they used was basically an old Falcon inline-6 with two cylinders removed, so it was probably heavy and inefficient compared to more modern 4-cyls. And I think it had a 2-bbl carb, instead of fuel injection. I'm sure the later Tempos were better once they got fuel injected. And I'd imagine that eventually, a 4-speed automatic found its way onto the option list.
 
I think the Tempo and especially the Topaz sedans looked kind of attractive around 1988, when they got a refreshening. The coupes never looked good, IMO though.
#16238 of 19378
Re: Great! [andre1969] by uplanderguy
Dec 28, 2008 (9:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Dec 28, 2008 8:13 am)

Overall, I probably like the '72 Impala the best of the '71-76 years, too, but wish they'd have put a rocker molding on it. The Biscayne and BelAir had them, but the Impala and Caprice did not. Duh!
 
In '74, the Sport Coupe got a squared-off quarter window and a flat rear window. We had one. My Dad wanted four windows that rolled down, and the Custom Coupe (and Caprice Coupe) had that roofline with the enormous, thick B pillar and quarter windows that did not roll down. They still had the concave rear window however.
 
The '75 was the last year for the Impala Sport Coupe. I've often thought it would have been nice to have ordered one of these fully-loaded, with the brown herringbone 50/50 seats, power windows and the like. I prefer the '74 and '75 Sport Coupe roofline to the '71-'73.
 
I also did not like at all, the '74-76 LeSabre, Catalina, and Delta 88 two-door rooflines....a door window, a small roll-down quarter window, and a goofy third window near the rear window!
 
Bill
#16239 of 19378
Tempo/Topaz... (andre1969) by hpmctorque
Dec 28, 2008 (9:31 am)
Reply
"... I'd imagine that eventually, a 4-speed automatic found its way onto the option list."
  
The Tempo/Topaz stayed with the 3-speed automatic as the only automatic until they were retired.
 
Circling back to our family friend's '85 and '88 K-cars, I now recall that one of them blew a head gasket at ~145,000. He repaired it himself, for not much money but a lot of labor, and drove it at least another 10,000 miles. Then he sold it for a few hundred dollars. The A/C went out on the other one at around 150,000, but the drivetrain lasted until ~170,000, at which point he sold the car, for next to nothing.
 
These K-cars delivered low cost-per-mile transportation, but our friend is very handy with a wrench.
#16240 of 19378
Re: I don't know (lokki) [hpmctorque] by fintail
Dec 28, 2008 (10:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Dec 27, 2008 9:05 pm)

A Tempo/Topaz was probably no worse than the comparable Cadavalier clone or K-car. My parents bought an 85 Tempo new as a commuter as both had increasing travel distances for work etc, bought as a third car as not to destroy the other cars (a Ciera and a POS S-10 Blazer...why'd they care?). Anyway, this Tempo was a GLX model, pretty much every option, plush interior, even power seat/tach/wheels etc along with windows, trunk release, tape player. It got a huge amount of miles racked up in its first few years, then was used as a spare car, then used for kids. My mom finally got rid of it about 10 years ago, it had something around 190K on it at that time, and the powertrain had never been touched. It had some electrical glitches and it would puke up a primitive engine computer now and then, but it wasn't unreliable, it just got a little eccentric as it aged. The paint and interior held up very well - no dead paint, no cracking or tearing of the interior etc. I drove it pretty hard, and I am sure my sister and my cousin weren't easy on it either - but it kept on going. It had the painfully slow 2.3 HSC 4, I am sure my fintail could walk away from it. I remember I would drive it like a manual just to coax a little more speed out of it, as the slushbox was defiant and illogical. When the car was about 10 years old the exhaust system rotted out, and I drove it a few times like that - it didn't sound too bad, reminded me of a crappy rally car. I remember my mom sold it to a guy who worked for a tire shop...he updated some worn suspension bits, put some modern wheels on it, and gave it to his kid as their first car. She got $600 for it, which seemed good for a 190K mile Tempo. I saw it a few years ago.
#16241 of 19378
. by fintail
Dec 28, 2008 (11:34 am)
Reply
Nice late local fintail...owner has sunk a fortune into it, apparently...and he won't get it back. I can only wish my engine was that clean. Maybe with the dollar losing steam vs the Euro again, it will go back to Germany.
#16242 of 19378
various in ct... by explorerx4
Dec 28, 2008 (10:02 pm)
Reply
um why?
 
considering offers? really?
 
you have to pay for all those sweet nothings
 
nice pic if you are trying to sell a car
 
great picture
 
palfingers are really big bucks
 
just totally wrong
 
mechanic: yup, it's been wrecked, here is my bill for $150.
 
only has 3 sides, other than that, not bad
 
this marketing used to work
#16243 of 19378
by lokki
Dec 29, 2008 (5:49 am)
Reply
That Falcon - As anyone who has ever seen a 4Dr Camry with a spoiler and a fartpipe exhaust knows, you work with what ya got.
 
Only smells like antifreeze? Oh, OK then. That's worth $1000 bucks. After looking at that picture who ever would think you'd want to use the heater anyway?
 
I want that MGB, bad, and I'm not even really an MG fan.
 
Mustang - I wouldn't be in any Rousch to buy it. I bet I'd be able to get one at the dealer without 30 miles on it for less money
#16244 of 19378
Re: various in ct... [explorerx4] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Dec 29, 2008 (7:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Dec 28, 2008 10:02 pm)

98 BMW 528i -- well if you're going to roll the dice on a high-miles BMW, this might be the one. Looks like a nice car.
 
95 Taurus Wagon --let's see---smells of antifreeze when you turn the heater on, but not when the heater is off. Could it be the heater core? Gee, I just don't know.
 
72 MGB/GT -- well... it bid to $6600 and he turned that down. It's a coupe, so you can't expect convertible money. He certainly did a good eBay ad. I'd guess that with thicker sway bars, poly bushings all round, and modified suspension, AND this being a hard-riding car to begin with, that driving this baby on the streets of a city is going to be a pretty brutal affair indeed.
 
Avanti -- the car that would not die. Please go away.
 
2001 Honda -- Blue Book asking price is $7900 and he wants 6400 for a salvaged car. Oh my, someone needs a cruel and sobering reality check.
 
2008 Brand New Roush -- so who cares? Are you thinkin' it's hard to find one?
#16245 of 19378
overseas shipping by lemmer
Dec 29, 2008 (8:45 am)
Reply
Anybody know anything about it?
 
I have this guy in Nigeria that wants to pay big money for my car...just kidding. In all seriousness, if I wanted to get a car from Birmingham, AL to the Netherlands what is the best way to do it? It looks like the car would ship from Jacksonville, FL. Can the seller arrange to have it picked up here in Birmingham and shipped out of Jacksonville? Do I have to do a lot of paperwork or is that the seller's problem? Any other issues I am missing?
#16246 of 19378
Re: overseas shipping [lemmer] by texases
Dec 29, 2008 (8:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemmer (Dec 29, 2008 8:45 am)

I got nuttin re: shipping - I would check out Hemmings.com to see if they have some advertisers that do it.

Messages Page 1625 of 1939
1
...
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
...
1939
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement