Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Classic Cars Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"
19249 messages, Last post on Nov 10, 2009 at 3:21 PM
You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
|
Lots of Birds in flight - at reasonable prices? I always loved these... make me think of the Jetsons! http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/946446308.html http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/943124059.html http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/940982184.html This looks a more of a mugging set-up than a serious ad http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/940982184.html Memories of the dark ages of the Thunderbirds http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/942544250.html These just never excited me.... they had so much promise....but http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/936842050.html Can someone please explain this picture for me? http://dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/923559812.html |
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 05, 2008 4:58 pm) That Roadrunner pic looks kinda like an aborted Dukes of Hazzard stunt. Maybe for the pilot they tried using a '71 Roadrunner but discovered it sucked at jumping, so they went with the '69 Charger (and a few '68's and an occasional '70  ) instead?
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Dec 05, 2008 5:09 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 05, 2008 4:58 pm) Let's see---we got yer Classic Birds or "Little Birds", then yer Square Birds ("lets give the market away to Corvette") , then yer Bullet Birds, then yer Jet Birds (why that name?) and then the Dark Ages aka the "Big Birds" (appropriate as they weighed 4,300 lbs)...... 2002 T-Bird: "Let's make them all 6 cylinder automatics. No one will notice!"
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 05, 2008 5:41 pm) I think the only time I've ever heard the word "pig" used as an adjective was in describing the handling of a mid-60's T-bird, but how bad, really, would a '66 be? I mean, if I'm comfortable driving a '67 Catalina and a '57 DeSoto, could a '66 T-bird be any more of a challenge? I know it would be a joke by today's standards, but would it be bad, even by the standards of the time? Oh, as for that early 70's Bird, it was a lot more than 4300 lb. Try more like 5,000+! The thing was basically an uglied-up Mark IV. When they went to the intermediate Torino/LTD-II platform, THAT got them down to about 4000-4300 lb!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Dec 05, 2008 5:51 pm) Some people like the new Birds---ladies love 'em. 66 T-Bird -- you would not believe how badly they handle. You wouldn't believe me if I told you how bad. You'd think me unkind, you'd accuse me of exaggeration, bias, distortion. But I'll try--- think of driving your Mom's old sofa on the freeway.
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 05, 2008 6:06 pm) In a perverse sort of way, you have me curious to experience one! What did Ford do to those cars to make them handle so badly? If I can handle a '67 Catalina, would I be okay with a '66 T-bird? Or does the Bird take it to a whole new level?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: andre1969 (Dec 05, 2008 6:52 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: lokki (Dec 05, 2008 4:58 pm) NADA prices are for ignorants. |
|
This just goes WAY beyond poor spelling!
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars Project Cars--You Get to Vote on "Hold 'em or Fold 'em"
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
